Gun owners should have no right to free speech

[ShooterInPA1]

A letter to the editor from a leftist:

How about a law that matches up gun ownership with those that post dangerous rhetoric and put a public warning notice on every one of their postings? We can’t stop their free speech, but we should be able to put them “on notice” that their views and weapons put the public at risk.


https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...114-story.html

[Gunsnwater]

Progressive rhetoric must be working.

[Pilot321]

There are a lot of LOONY people on the Left that want to remove Natural Rights from people. In fact many of them are willing to give up some of their rights for some false sense of safety, and security.

[Berncly]

These are the same Liberal Democrats who think it is great that one of them did a photo shoot holding the bloody severed head of President Trump.
The same Liberal Democrats who call law abiding gun owners terrorists but who refuse to call actual Islamist mass murderers terrorists.
The Liberal Democrat ideological talking points are twisted nonsensical rantings of borderline psychotics.

[streaker69]

Waiting for the anti-fascists to denounce this guy's fascist thoughts.

[Boots_DE]

From the comments section... She wants a "sane" gun law that criminals will obey; good luck with that!

We pride ourselves on being a nation of laws, yet a gun law that can save many lives has been unattainable because of the National Rifle Association’s financial and political stranglehold on Republicans.

Now that Democrats will be the majority in the House and Gov.-elect Gavin Newsom is a gun-control advocate, it is essential for them to promote and pass a sane gun-control law.

Bunny Landis
Oceanside

It is interesting that she doesn't offer any suggestions for a "sane" law like she wants.
In my opinion, one sane law would be to eliminate gun-free zones, like the State of California, so people wouldn't be sitting ducks unable to protect themselves.

[eagleclaw]

Second Amendment rights in California are already on that state’s endangered species list. As far as I’m concerned there are not enough pro-gun people in CA to make a difference at the voting booth. Illegal voting favors the liberals along with anti gun politicians. However CA has had a sufficient number of legal liberal voters to turn and keep CA anti-gun without illegal voter help.

Therefore I am not concerned about the writer's opinion if she is from CA because their gun rights in that state are just about gone. I am concerned with people who have those views living in PA especially with an anti gun Governor that is "howling" with the recent passing of an anti -gun bill, an anti- gun AG and a waffling house and senate.

Someone should advise her that many websites already regulated gun topics such as Youtube. Besides, how can anyone take some name “Bunny” seriously.

[ideaman]

Hold it! The Constitution is NOT SUBJECT TO WHAT THE POPULATION WANTS, Any changes to the Constitution MUST BE BY THE CONVENTIOIN OF STATES!

Should we inform the liberals? Example,we could end the 1st because it hurt's others feelings, and get rid of the 5th because it blocks the truth.

[bill gray]

The simple solution that would satisfy everyone is to just make murder illegal. Oh wait....

[Emptymag]

I don't know why you guys are so opposed to having a "conversation" about gun violence.