Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Upper Darby, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Age
    57
    Posts
    4,240
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    Quote Originally Posted by GunLawyer001 View Post
    The problem with that is that she probably thought that she had destroyed the rifle, not created a short but functional rifle.

    You don't have to know that your act is illegal to be successfully prosecuted, but you have to know that you're performing the act. If I didn't know that it was illegal to sell heroin, but I knew I was selling it, I'm guilty. But if I genuinely thought it was baby powder or ginseng, and was selling it at baby powder or ginseng prices, I have a good defense, because I was unaware that I was committing the bad act.

    It's illegal to knowingly manufacture an unregistered SBR (with obvious exceptions). I don't commit that crime if I drop a Title I rifle into a wood chipper and it gets mangled but will still fire 1 shot. I'm also not culpable if I believe that cutting the barrel off will disable the gun, so that it's not a rifle because it won't function any more. Lots of machines will cease function if you remove parts, it's reasonable for an ignorant hoplophobe to assume the same applies to guns. See how well your revolver works if you remove the cylinder or trigger or a few springs.

    On the other hand, that idiot talking head who brought a functional 30-round magazine into DC and showed it on live TV, HE knew what he was doing, and it's absurd that they let him off without prosecution. I don't care if he lacked criminal intent and that he was only doing it in aid of more gun control, he knew that he had a prohibited mag in DC.
    I appreciate the clarification. I am now (slightly) less pissed off.

    As for Sir Bag-of-douche in DC, I'm still pissed about that one.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Southwest, Pennsylvania
    (Washington County)
    Posts
    1,942
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    Everybody knows you can't go modifying these braces to make them better to shoulder. Everybody knows they're a SBR workaround, and everybody knows they get shouldered, but once you modify it to make a better stock, you're asking for it. The only reason they got approved in the first place was because they make a shitty stock. Don't poke the bear.

    That said, put me on the jury and he's not guilty. Why? Because fuck ATF.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    PRNY
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Power
    8688182

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    Quote Originally Posted by marinville View Post
    Everybody knows you can't go modifying these braces to make them better to shoulder.
    I just learned about the existence of pistol braces in this thread today.

    I suppose there is a small possibility that I was the only person left in the world who didn't know about them. Seems somewhat unlikely.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    allentown, Pennsylvania
    (Northampton County)
    Posts
    185
    Rep Power
    739643

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    what he said....

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt.K View Post
    To be able to stand the gun up in the safe without it slipping. That's my answer and I'm sticking to it.

    Personally, if I'm gonna shoulder my AR pistol, I can do so with just a buffer tube. Sure, it might be more accurate with something that *resembles* a stock, but it's a 7" barrel, not a "reach out and touch someone" tack driver.

    My 2¢
    Sec. 21. The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Upper Darby, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Age
    57
    Posts
    4,240
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    Quote Originally Posted by OwnTheRide View Post
    I just learned about the existence of pistol braces in this thread today.

    I suppose there is a small possibility that I was the only person left in the world who didn't know about them. Seems somewhat unlikely.
    You live in NY. You and your fellow subjects probably can't have an AR pistol, so you wouldn't have any need for a brace. Those of us in free America discuss them at length.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Southwest, Pennsylvania
    (Washington County)
    Posts
    1,942
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    Quote Originally Posted by OwnTheRide View Post
    I just learned about the existence of pistol braces in this thread today.

    I suppose there is a small possibility that I was the only person left in the world who didn't know about them. Seems somewhat unlikely.
    I'd wager you're correct, in that you weren't the actual last person on the planet to learn what a pistol brace is... you may actually be the last on this forum, however.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    11,812
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    Quote Originally Posted by OwnTheRide View Post
    I just learned about the existence of pistol braces in this thread today.

    I suppose there is a small possibility that I was the only person left in the world who didn't know about them. Seems somewhat unlikely.
    Don't sweat it, I only found out a few months ago.
    Gender confusion is a mental illness

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Bechtelsville, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    919
    Rep Power
    20052528

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    Cane tips have been approved by ATF for use on buffer tubes for almost a decade that I am aware of. Just do a google search and you'll find the ATF letters and LOTS of discussion of them. I believe the first approval was Oct 13, 2009, but there may have been ones before.
    Joshua Prince, Esq. - Firearms Industry Consulting Group - www.PaFirearmsLawyer.com

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Dickson City, Pennsylvania
    (Lackawanna County)
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,776
    Rep Power
    21474854

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    I finally built an AR pistol because the brace nonsense was finally sorted out(at this moment in time).
    Now, do I drop a binary trigger in this one? I like the one in the carbine.

    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Voltaire.
    America must suffer until it reaches the point that Liberty is more important than Comforts.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    11,812
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Default Re: Man wins case vs. ATF - IMPORTANT READ

    Quote Originally Posted by qmcorps View Post
    I finally built an AR pistol because the brace nonsense was finally sorted out(at this moment in time).
    Now, do I drop a binary trigger in this one? I like the one in the carbine.
    Why not? Fire it up!
    Gender confusion is a mental illness

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Norfolk VA open carry case wins
    By PennsyPlinker in forum Open Carry
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: December 19th, 2008, 11:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •