Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
October 24th, 2018, 11:34 AM #1
Legal Standards Question on HB2060
What is the standard of proof that would support the issuance of a PFA? Is that standard the same for converting a temporary PFA to a permanent order? How do those standards compare to the legal standard which would support the issuance of a search warrant in Pennsylvania?
-
October 24th, 2018, 05:35 PM #2
-
October 24th, 2018, 08:54 PM #3Grand Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
-
bloomsburg,
Pennsylvania
(Columbia County) - Posts
- 1,605
- Rep Power
- 21474852
-
October 24th, 2018, 10:31 PM #4
Re: Legal Standards Question on HB2060
This could all prove to be interesting. If a PFA can be issued with lesser standard than that required for a search warrant, I am curious about the result if a police officer enters a home to verify or enforce compliance with the 24-hour rule, or to seize firearms and stumbles upon evidence of other criminal activity (i.e. possible marijuana ash or leaves in an ashtray, possible stolen property,). Can those other crimes be prosecuted based on what the officer observes or seizes even though he had no warrant?
Normally, police have to have enough evidence to obtain a warrant to search for drugs or possession of stolen property. If the standard for the PFA is less than a standard to support the issuance of a warrant, then it seems that the 4th amendment can be compromised.
In a more extreme case, what if the PFA is proven to have been groundless? Can a DA prosecute the other unrelated crimes based on police entrance into the premises based on a groundless PFA? If the PFA is groundless, can a person still be prosecuted for violating the 24 hour rule?
None of this has happened yet, but when I see due process rights being denied, I speculate about other consequences that might flow from that denial.
-
October 24th, 2018, 11:17 PM #5
Re: Legal Standards Question on HB2060
No judge wants to be the person who denied a PFA to a woman who is later killed by the subject of the PFA.
The price a judge would pay for that is much greater than the price for granting a baseless order, so most requests are going to be granted if the woman (usually it's a woman) articulates anything even close to a basis.
It's not really about due process, it's political.Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
-
October 24th, 2018, 11:54 PM #6
Re: Legal Standards Question on HB2060
who can have a PFA done? is it limited to family members, friends, co-workers...
-
October 25th, 2018, 02:46 AM #7
Re: Legal Standards Question on HB2060
A woman is to be believed. Learned that watching the Kavanaugh hearings.
Similar Threads
-
We need to activate all members to HB2060
By mikelets456 in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 6Last Post: October 4th, 2018, 09:10 AM -
Let's thank the Rep s that voted against HB2060
By Tootie in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 4Last Post: October 2nd, 2018, 08:38 PM -
EMERGENCY!! HB2060 & HB2227 votes this week
By Tootie in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 193Last Post: September 29th, 2018, 01:25 PM -
Obama misguided on legal, ethical standards
By velkly in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: September 4th, 2009, 07:24 PM -
A legal question
By phillyshooter in forum GeneralReplies: 89Last Post: August 21st, 2008, 08:22 AM
Bookmarks