Since when did SIG start not including sights

**jakebrake** · May 30th, 2018, 02:16 PM

Never settle, folks...

Never settle.

**JenniferG** · May 30th, 2018, 05:46 PM

Most people take the factory sites off and throw them in a box and spend huge amount on new sites that are basically the same as the factory sites. Sig is responding to the market.

**joeman123** · May 30th, 2018, 08:44 PM

I will take all sights that people take off moving forward lol. Sig ones are 132$ for the pair it was my idea that they were just cost cutting on something that im sure they have a good profit Margain on.

**eagleclaw** · May 30th, 2018, 09:43 PM

The SIG bean counters are at it again. Maybe by not including sights on some new guns is how they are making up for the financial loss of their voluntary SIG 320 upgrade program.

**MattMPA** · May 30th, 2018, 09:47 PM

Originally Posted by nfafan

I recall when Toyota charged extra for black paint when the 82 Supra was introduced... Anyway to the OP's point -

When the sweet SIG 552 rimfire EBR was introduced, it was suggested it would come with SIGs CHICOM red-dot. When it was finally released - NO sights were included at all. So yeah, what a load of shit.

No matter how excellent my 552 is - last SIG product this guy bought.

Still off topic...but I remember when Toyota charged more for black, too. I had a 84 Supra...but mine was blue.