Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Berwyn, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    483
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Preemption Violation--West Chester Borough--Chester County

    Discovered this ordinance while browsing the Borough Code online tonight.

    Chapter 78: PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS
    [HISTORY: Adopted by the Council of the Borough of West Chester 5-25-1970 as Ord. No. 11-1970; amended in its entirety 6-17-1992 by Ord. No. 12-1992. Subsequent amendments noted where applicable.]

    § 78-1. Establishment of rules and regulations.

    The following rules and regulations are hereby established for the management and protection of parks and playgrounds located within the Borough of West Chester, hereinafter designated "the parks":

    A.
    B.
    C.
    ......
    L. Possession of firearms by any person other than a duly authorized police officer is not permitted.

    This is a letter being sent out tomorrow to all 8 Borough Council members. Since they all list their home addresses on the Borough website, I'm sending them there, certified mail, return receipt. I will post replies as I receive them. Lets hope this doesn't turn into another Hazle Township case.

    September 25, 2008

    Honorable


    Dear

    I am a member of an organization called The Pennsylvania Firearms Owners Association. I would like to bring to the attention of the Borough Council an ordinance that appears to be in violation of state law. I became aware of this issue while browsing the Borough Code online.

    Chapter 78, Parks and Playgrounds, § 78-1 Establishment of rules and regulations, Subsection L, which states the following:

    “Possession of firearms by any person other than a duly authorized police officer is not permitted”

    This ordinance is in violation of Title 18, Chapter 61, Subchapter A (otherwise known as The Uniform Firearms Act), specifically §6120 (a) that states:

    "General rule: No county, municipality or township may in any manner regulate the lawful ownership, possession, transfer or transportation of firearms, ammunition or ammunition components when carried or transported for purposes not prohibited by the laws of this commonwealth.”

    The preemption statute I quoted was passed in 1995. I am unsure when regulation L was passed. It may have been in place before 1995, explaining why it could have been overlooked. Unfortunately there was no grandfathering of existing limitations when The Uniform Firearms Act was passed. Ordinance “L” as it stands today is invalid with regards to the carrying or possessing a firearm in a township park.

    I know some people might want to know why someone would want to carry a firearm in a township park. The answer may be as simple as they carry a firearm daily. I know I do. But that question is not really the issue.

    The preemption statute I quoted is very important for Pennsylvanians that legally carry a firearm, in that it removes the problem of a traveling citizen running afoul of a myriad of local laws prohibiting where you can and cannot carry a firearm. In other words, licensed or otherwise legal carriers of firearms in Pennsylvania can carry everywhere not prohibited by state or federal law.

    Of particular interest to West Chester Borough is that since this rule is unenforceable, there could be negative consequences should an unknowing person, or even one choosing to ignore the rule knowing it is null and void, happen to be cited or otherwise confronted. If a police officer were to enforce such rule or ordinance, wrongful arrest and other charges could be laid on the officer, the police department and West Chester Borough--not an inexpensive proposition.

    I respectfully ask that the Borough Council look into this matter. Please let me know how you and your colleagues will proceed with bringing West Chester Borough in compliance with state law. A copy of §6120 is also attached.


    Awaiting your response, I remain,

    Most respectfully yours,


    Cc: Other 7 Members


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cherry Tree, Pennsylvania
    (Indiana County)
    Age
    76
    Posts
    5,488
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Default Re: Preemption Violation--West Chester Borough--Chester County

    Don't forget to follow up on it. Gotta keep the pressure applied. One township/county/borough/city at a time.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Posts
    17
    Rep Power
    0

    Thumbs up Re: Preemption Violation--West Chester Borough--Chester County

    Good work. The people giving them pressure is the only way to change these things. Thanks for being active and doing something not just talking about it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Berwyn, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    483
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Preemption Violation--West Chester Borough--Chester County

    Quote Originally Posted by Statkowski View Post
    Don't forget to follow up on it. Gotta keep the pressure applied. One township/county/borough/city at a time.
    I've got three going right now. I'll wait until one is resolved before I pick up another one. Going to see a local attorney next week about if/when a court filing may be necessary for a municipality that refuses to comply. I'm also thinking about organizing some type of local group here in SE Pa to meet monthly and address these type of issues. I may post a thread shortly to get things started.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    St. Petersburg, Florida
    Posts
    1,338
    Rep Power
    220793

    Default Re: Preemption Violation--West Chester Borough--Chester County

    I would remove the word, "unfortunately". There is nothing unfortunate about one's rights being reestablished and protected.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Berwyn, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    483
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Preemption Violation--West Chester Borough--Chester County

    Quote Originally Posted by ThomasJ View Post
    I would remove the word, "unfortunately". There is nothing unfortunate about one's rights being reestablished and protected.
    You're the second person that suggested this. I see it as another way of saying "sorry charlie" your illegal ordinance wasn't grandfathered.

    Unfortunate for them, fortunate for us.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    ?, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    2,152
    Rep Power
    18666

    Default Re: Preemption Violation--West Chester Borough--Chester County

    Quote Originally Posted by Statkowski View Post
    Don't forget to follow up on it. Gotta keep the pressure applied. One township/county/borough/city at a time.
    Sorry to bump this... GL23, did they ever get back to you about this?

Similar Threads

  1. Lackawanna county parks preemption violation.
    By jahwarrior72 in forum Pennsylvania
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 12th, 2010, 12:39 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: June 19th, 2009, 02:47 PM
  3. Replies: 29
    Last Post: October 26th, 2008, 12:58 PM
  4. Bomb in West Chester
    By MTechnik in forum General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: September 17th, 2008, 03:31 PM
  5. Ranges near West Chester, PA
    By LAMcLeod04 in forum General
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: November 6th, 2006, 01:47 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •