Results 1 to 10 of 75
Hybrid View
-
March 26th, 2018, 04:48 PM #1
Good Gawd---NJ, unbelievable! This crap better not come here!
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf...rt_river_index
The bills on the docket Monday include:
* A1217, which would create restraining orders in the state allowing family members and others to ask a judge to have a person's guns seized and ban them from buying weapons for up to a year.
* A1181, which would mandate law enforcement in the state to seize a person's guns if a mental health professional determines they pose a threat to themselves or others.
* A2758, which would strictly define that state residents need to show a "justifiable need" to obtain a permit to carry a handgun -- meaning they must show they face a specific threat to their own safety.
* A2757, which would require all private gun sales in the state to go through a licensed dealer who can perform an additional background check at the point of sale.
* A2759, which would create an outright ban in the state on possessing armor-piercing bullets.
* A2761, which would ban magazines in the state that hold more than 10 rounds, with some exceptions."I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." Thomas Jefferson
-
March 26th, 2018, 04:53 PM #2
Re: Good Gawd---NJ, unbelievable! This crap better not come here!
Justifiable need?....Isn't it already nearly impossible for Jersians to obtain a permit?....and I thought they already had a ten round magazine limit in place.
There are no pacts between lions and men.
-
March 26th, 2018, 04:56 PM #3
-
March 26th, 2018, 04:58 PM #4
Re: Good Gawd---NJ, unbelievable! This crap better not come here!
This one concerns me immensely!!!
* A1217, which would create restraining orders in the state allowing family members and others to ask a judge to have a person's guns seized and ban them from buying weapons for up to a year."I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." Thomas Jefferson
-
March 26th, 2018, 05:17 PM #5
-
March 26th, 2018, 05:23 PM #6Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
-
Pennsyltucky,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 8,076
- Rep Power
- 21474862
Re: Good Gawd---NJ, unbelievable! This crap better not come here!
Who needs due process?
Trump! Trump! Trump!
-
March 26th, 2018, 05:27 PM #7Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
-
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Posts
- 1,658
- Rep Power
- 21474846
-
March 26th, 2018, 05:33 PM #8Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
-
Pennsyltucky,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 8,076
- Rep Power
- 21474862
-
March 26th, 2018, 07:32 PM #9Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
-
Yutopia,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 3,791
- Rep Power
- 13571860
-
March 26th, 2018, 08:03 PM #10Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
-
Richboro,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 3,070
- Rep Power
- 21474851
Re: Good Gawd---NJ, unbelievable! This crap better not come here!
At this point NJ is a lost cause. The votes were not even close. I can't even feel sorry for NJ gun owners anymore, They just need to move.
The measures that passed are:
* A1217, which would create restraining orders in the state allowing family members and others to ask a judge to have a person's guns seized and ban them from buying weapons for up to a year. It passed 59-13, with 4 abstentions.
* A1181, which would mandate law enforcement in the state take a person's guns if a mental health professional determines they are a threat to themselves or others. It passed 62-7, with 7 abstentions.
* A2758, which would strictly define that state residents need to show a "justifiable need" to obtain a permit to carry a handgun. It passed 48-26, with 2 abstentions.
* A2757, which would require all private gun sales in the state to go through a licensed dealer who can perform an additional background check at the point of sale. It passed 61-9, with 5 abstentions.
* A2759, which would create an outright ban in the state on possessing armor-piercing bullets, which are already federally outlawed. It passed 75-0, with 1 abstention.
Sponsors say the measure is needed to line up with federal law.
* A2761, which would ban magazines in the state that hold more than 10 rounds, with some exceptions. It passed 48-25, with 3 abstentions.
People who currently own magazines with more than 10 rounds can keep their firearms, though they will have to register them and pay a $50 fee.
Similar Threads
-
Unbelievable...
By CaliRefugee in forum LancasterReplies: 25Last Post: April 17th, 2014, 11:20 PM -
Unbelievable!!!
By K31 in forum GeneralReplies: 19Last Post: November 24th, 2008, 12:59 AM
Bookmarks