Results 21 to 30 of 76
-
January 14th, 2018, 09:58 AM #21
Re: ATF asking for public input re bumpfire rules.
Merged two threads on the subject.
NoahWisdom and knowledge shall be the stability of thy times.
-
January 14th, 2018, 11:19 AM #22Active Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Location
-
Lake Effect,
Pennsylvania
(Crawford County) - Posts
- 206
- Rep Power
- 3181883
Re: ATF asking for public input re bumpfire rules.
It appears the BATF has already made up their mind as evidenced by the questions they are asking. Are they really so ignorant of how a bump stock operates that they would seriously ask if there is a market for military and law enforcement applications? And are they really asking the public to do their research for them rather than do it themselves? The Agency has already been given the go ahead to interpret the law as Congress created it anyway it wants......which is the real tradegy. I applaud all who take the time to comment. I understand those who don’t. 5hey are going to have to define an unacceptable rate of fire and then start picking apart pieces of plastic and metal to ban for a long time. What a waste of taxpayers money.
-
January 14th, 2018, 11:35 AM #23
Re: ATF asking for public input re bumpfire rules.
Did it.
-
January 14th, 2018, 01:52 PM #24
Re: ATF asking for public input re bumpfire rules.
I hope the quivering in fear is not aimed at me. I have other things to consider besides what ATF is going to do anyway while setting me up as an easy mark by who knows. Fuck them and fuck that.
-
January 14th, 2018, 03:24 PM #25Active Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Location
-
Lake Effect,
Pennsylvania
(Crawford County) - Posts
- 206
- Rep Power
- 3181883
Re: ATF asking for public input re bumpfire rules.
ATF and any other federal agency knows who you are but as of yet, when you buy a gun you are not asked to swear that you will relinquish those guns when the government comes to confiscate them. Depending on what you say on the website, you could be placing yourself in a file that contains persons of interest who will probably resist based on the computer algorithm set up to filter every “public comment.”
In this case, my personal opinion is that they have made up their minds and they want to know who will oppose them and how many of them there are. It’s a great way to collect intelligence.
Now, I will take my tinfoil hat off and finish reading the books on WACO and Ruby Ridge.Last edited by Williamsmith; January 14th, 2018 at 03:27 PM.
-
January 14th, 2018, 05:09 PM #26
Re: ATF taking comments regarding their ability to redefine what is and is not a MG.
I've considered that as well. I think we still are several election cycles away, but it is likely to happen.
I want to be on that "naughty list" when the time comes. Hopefully I'll be old enough to not give a shit, and young enough to make things interesting.
A more likely short term outcome is being flooded with tele-marketing, etc. I had this happen as soon as I filed for a USDOT registration. The marketing calls and emails started instantly. I bet various political fund raising groups will be all over that list.
-
January 14th, 2018, 10:44 PM #27
Re: ATF taking comments regarding their ability to redefine what is and is not a MG.
Copied and paste.
-
January 15th, 2018, 10:38 PM #28
Re: ATF taking comments regarding their ability to redefine what is and is not a MG.
Commented
-
January 16th, 2018, 11:05 PM #29Active Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
-
Bethlehem, PA,
Pennsylvania
(Northampton County) - Posts
- 236
- Rep Power
- 9955187
Re: ATF taking comments regarding their ability to redefine what is and is not a MG.
Commented on the eleventh but it is still not posted. When I use my tracking number I get "This comment was received in Regulations.gov but is not yet posted. Please contact the agency directly for more information."
How long does it really take?
Stuart
-
January 16th, 2018, 11:23 PM #30Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
-
West Chester,
Pennsylvania
(Chester County) - Posts
- 1,430
- Rep Power
- 10176462
Re: ATF taking comments regarding their ability to redefine what is and is not a MG.
Message sent to the Party Bureau.
Hoplophobia is funny
Similar Threads
-
Liberals Redefine The Term Mass Shooting...
By Jhaydeno in forum NationalReplies: 21Last Post: December 5th, 2015, 09:37 AM -
Ability to own a fire arm
By zeroflat24 in forum GeneralReplies: 10Last Post: October 5th, 2012, 11:11 AM
Bookmarks