Results 1 to 10 of 27
-
October 15th, 2017, 06:11 PM #1
Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
Congress To BAN Large Capacity Magazines?? HR 4052, submitted by Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-CT) looks to BAN magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, nation wide. The Bill also looks to BAN the transfer and possession of these magazines, so no grandfather clause either. Violations of this Bill would be punishable by 10 years in prison. READ the Bill here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-c...
-
October 15th, 2017, 06:26 PM #2Super Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
-
Philly Burbs,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 854
- Rep Power
- 21474852
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
Ha. Been there done that and didn’t work but they don’t stop trying. It won’t pass but if it did I could probably buy myself an M16 with all the pmags I have.
-
October 15th, 2017, 06:35 PM #3
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
OK, as long as the mag ban applies to 75 mm and larger, except for mags on battleships, cruisers, destroyers, aircraft carriers, air-platforms, military in harms way, private owners of shootable collectibles, and such....
- bamboomaster
-
October 15th, 2017, 07:47 PM #4Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
-
Quakertown,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 1,288
- Rep Power
- 21474846
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
Can we have the Russians flood her email with spam...
-
October 15th, 2017, 07:56 PM #5
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!
-
October 15th, 2017, 08:27 PM #6
-
October 15th, 2017, 10:41 PM #7Super Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
somewhere,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 624
- Rep Power
- 21474849
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
It only "won't pass" if we make it clear to our Reps and Senators, each and every time, that introducing or supporting these anti-gun bills will result in lost votes and lost seats. Call them and let them know you don't approve.
Be proactive. Complacency is death to liberty.I am not a lawyer.
-
October 15th, 2017, 10:51 PM #8
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
Grandfathering is Constitutionally required in Federal laws. The Feds have no police power, and there's the "takings clause". Together, they mean that the Feds have to pay you if they take away the value of your property by law. That's why they grandfather stuff and only restrict future manufacture and sale.
There was a time when our elected representatives knew this stuff. A time when presidents didn't tell us how much they were disappointed by the limitations of the Constitution.Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
-
October 15th, 2017, 11:34 PM #9
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
How can you have any cookies if you don't drink your milk?
-
October 16th, 2017, 05:49 AM #10
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
Similar Threads
-
Thinking about something with greater mag capacity
By dk99358 in forum PistolsReplies: 33Last Post: January 21st, 2016, 05:54 AM -
Senate right-to-carry bill introduced
By doug in forum GeneralReplies: 22Last Post: February 9th, 2009, 01:40 AM -
Anti-Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)
By Ghost001 in forum GeneralReplies: 11Last Post: April 21st, 2007, 08:26 AM
Bookmarks