Results 11 to 20 of 30
-
August 28th, 2017, 05:01 PM #11
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
It's just like; I think it would be really cool to have a pet tiger, until it ate my face.
-
August 28th, 2017, 05:28 PM #12
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself"
"He created the game, played the game, and lost the game.... All under his own terms, by his own doing." JW34
"Tolerance is the lube that helps slip the dildo of dysfunction into the ass of a civilized society." Plato
-
August 28th, 2017, 09:15 PM #13
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
When I first read this article, I thought it would have been pitbulls. Wolf inbreds are pretty bad too; you just can't trust them IMO. I'll never forget that horrific case about the pet chimp who ripped a woman's face off.
-
August 28th, 2017, 09:28 PM #14Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
-
Sarver,
Pennsylvania
(Butler County) - Posts
- 677
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
I'm weird. In some ways I'm a tree hugger and in some ways I would like to ruthlessly anihilate some species into extinction and not look back. Who shall I be today? Hmmmm....
-
August 28th, 2017, 09:29 PM #15
-
August 28th, 2017, 09:52 PM #16Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
-
Sarver,
Pennsylvania
(Butler County) - Posts
- 677
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
-
August 28th, 2017, 10:03 PM #17
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
I'll see that and raise you one.
Gender confusion is a mental illness
-
August 28th, 2017, 11:02 PM #18
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
It's just like the leftists who like to sympathize with feral humans. No matter how many people they rob and kill, trillions of dollars they flush down the toilet, and cities they turn into rundown 3rd world hellholes, it's still the "morally superior" thing to subsidize them. They're their pets.
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws--that's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." -- Ted Nugent
-
August 29th, 2017, 11:02 AM #19Grand Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
-
DeepInTheWoods,
Pennsylvania
(Warren County) - Posts
- 2,424
- Rep Power
- 21474854
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
Amen!
And Grammar Nazi sends rep on "they're their" usage!
Attachment 100330
DANG! Must spread rep around!American by BIRTH, Infidel by CHOICE
-
August 29th, 2017, 12:01 PM #20
Re: Self defense against dogs, holy smokes this sounds terrible
Similar Threads
-
SAFE CLEANING HOLY SMOKES !
By MARINE DIVISION TWO in forum PistolsReplies: 9Last Post: June 26th, 2015, 05:54 PM
Bookmarks