New Range - Guardian Training Center Warminster, PA

[streaker69]

Thank you for having a conversation with me. Would you now be so kind as to tell the forum members and customers of Guardian as to why you really don't like them?

I have no opinion, like or dislike. The rules were enforced same as I have enforced rules against people here that I do like, and those that I don't like.

[TheJudge]

Sure...

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/fascist

fascist
[fash-ist]
|
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR fascist ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who believes in or sympathizes with fascism.
( often initial capital letter ) a member of a fascist movement or party.
a person who is dictatorial or has extreme right-wing views.

I'm not a person that believes in or sympathizes with fascism.
I'm not a member of the fascist movement or party.
I'm not dictatorial or has extreme right wing views.

I'm a moderator on a forum that's enforcing the rules of the forum. If you think that's being a fascist, then I think it's you that needs to look up the definition.

fascism noun
fas·​cism | \ ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi- \
Definition of fascism
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
early instances of army fascism and brutality
— J. W. Aldridge

[streaker69]

fascism noun
fas·​cism | \ ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi- \
Definition of fascism
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
early instances of army fascism and brutality
— J. W. Aldridge

I guess if you want to twist enforcing the rules of a forum into some sort of fascism, then there isn't much point in discussing anything with you.

[TheJudge]

I guess if you want to twist enforcing the rules of a forum into some sort of fascism, then there isn't much point in discussing anything with you.

"...forceable suppression to opposition"

[internet troll]

This thread is hilarious.

Guardian training center and peeps: We have the right to kick out people who don’t follow rules and we see as troublemakers and people we don’t like from our property!

Also Guardian training center and peeps: What do you mean you are kicking us off your forum for not following rules! What about our freedom of speech rights?

Btw..... the Constitution and the first Amendment are our protection from the government..... not other citizens. Guardian training center has every right to run their business their way and ban people from their property for whatever reason. Just as the forum has the right to run it the way they see fit and ban who they want.

If you or I don’t like Guardian training centers policy or the forums policies, we are free to go elsewhere and say what we want about them elsewhere. There is no Constitutional right that forces them to do what we want them to on their property.

[TheJudge]

Looks really bad.

[cdi]

Thank you sir for publicly admiting you think its ok to attack your members without providing proof!

While taking another look at the definition of fascist, have a look at the definition of Non Sequitur.
BTW, Streaker never said anything about not liking the business- he objected to the sock puppets; and sent them packing. Exactly as he's supposed to do.

[streaker69]

"...forceable suppression to opposition"

Right. Nevermind those pesky rules that they broke. Thought you wanted to have an adult conversation. Comparing enforcing rules to fascism is just plain idiocy.

But I guess you're the only one allowed to use a distraction in this conversation.

[streaker69]

Looks really bad.

Anytime you're unhappy with the service you've received here, you're welcome to go back to lurking. I'm sure the forum will survive just fine without your alleged wisdom.

[TheJudge]

I agree you both have the right to behave as you like however you don't have the right to damage a another's reputation. Don't you think I should have to justify the following statement "I believe you and some of your friends are trying to damage GTCs reputation because you support another range." I can say it but if I'm wrong shouldn't I be held responsible?