Results 11 to 20 of 38
-
July 12th, 2017, 02:29 PM #11
Re: PA Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Lower Merion Preemption Appeal
The court ruled against them because the ordinance used their police power, allowed for a fine, and authorized the cops to remove them.
"Additionally, it is not clear whether the Ordinance was promulgated pursuant to the Township’s police powers or based on its rights as a property owner; however, the fact that the Ordinance authorizes the police to remove violators from Township parks suggests the Township’s police power is the basis for the Ordinance rather than its property-owner rights.
Therefore, the Township’s argument that Firearm Owners’ right to relief is not clear based on its authority to regulate its parks as a property owner pursuant to Wolfe is unpersuasive."
I won't address your last claim because it's self-evidently false.Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
-
July 12th, 2017, 03:36 PM #12
Re: PA Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Lower Merion Preemption Appeal
Always funny when someone plays Monday morning quarterback, who neither participated in the game nor watched it. And, if you were insinuating that you have filed amicus briefs in the PA appellate courts, it is interesting that the appellate court dockets don't have you ever having handled an appellate issue, let alone an amicus brief. Everyone can check by simply going to the UJS Portal https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/Docket...Appellate.aspx and then under docket sheets, clicking appellate courts. Then change the search type by court name and select the appellate court - Supreme, Commonwealth or Superior. One can then search merely by attorney name. Using your name, for each court, reflects no records.
Joshua Prince, Esq. - Firearms Industry Consulting Group - www.PaFirearmsLawyer.com
-
July 12th, 2017, 03:43 PM #13
Re: PA Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Lower Merion Preemption Appeal
You failed to correct the post that assumed that the case meant that no municipality was now allowed to post their parks "no guns", so I corrected it.
I said what I said, I insinuated nothing. I and other lawyers have done a lot for the cause, without the self-publicizing and self-congratulation that we sometimes see from you. There are plenty of ways to help PA gun owners, and they don't all involve headlines or cash or eliminating 302 relief. And I have never been sued by co-counsel. And lost.
Would you like to stop now, and just focus on accurate statements about the case? That's where I started here. Your case didn't reject the municipal property argument, it held that it didn't apply to these facts. Kind of like I said back in 2006, right here on PAFOA.Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
-
July 12th, 2017, 03:59 PM #14
Re: PA Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Lower Merion Preemption Appeal
Funny, you seem to leave out of your snip-it, the preceding statement by the Court "Rather, the UFA explicitly prohibits a township from regulating 'in any manner' and contains no express exemptions authorizing a township to enact ordinances permitting firearm regulation on its property, i.e., parks, comparable to that contained in the Game Law."
Joshua Prince, Esq. - Firearms Industry Consulting Group - www.PaFirearmsLawyer.com
-
July 12th, 2017, 04:04 PM #15
Re: PA Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Lower Merion Preemption Appeal
Dudes.
You are both rock stars to our community and beyond.
You both do excellent work that benefits us all.
As a guy who wishes he could do more but can't, I very much appreciate what you guys do.
As do many, many other people.
There is still plenty of fight left to do out there.
No sense in wasting the fight in here.
Respectfully,
BernclyHow can you have any cookies if you don't drink your milk?
-
July 12th, 2017, 04:06 PM #16
-
July 12th, 2017, 04:11 PM #17
Re: PA Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Lower Merion Preemption Appeal
So, I can now OC instead of CC at the LM park my kid plays at? Cool.
-
July 12th, 2017, 04:13 PM #18
-
July 12th, 2017, 04:19 PM #19
Re: PA Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Lower Merion Preemption Appeal
Signs are not "ordinances". The snippet you posted doesn't contradict my point at all. Telling people that they are free to ignore "no guns" signs in municipal parks is not backed up by this case. This case stands for the old proposition that municipalities can't enact ordinances that restrict our gun rights.
What I posted back in 2006:
http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.ph...ge=7#post15891Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
-
July 12th, 2017, 05:00 PM #20
Similar Threads
-
Lower Merion Preemption??
By sir Joseph in forum MontgomeryReplies: 4Last Post: July 12th, 2017, 12:40 PM -
Lower Merion to discuss repealing preemption
By sir Joseph in forum MontgomeryReplies: 0Last Post: December 27th, 2014, 11:29 PM -
Supreme Court won't hear arguments against Md. gun law
By ShooterInPA1 in forum NationalReplies: 2Last Post: October 16th, 2013, 03:30 PM -
High Court Refuses to Hear Phila. Gun Ordinance Case
By shiloh in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 11Last Post: June 10th, 2010, 09:25 AM
Bookmarks