Results 1 to 10 of 19
-
September 9th, 2008, 07:58 PM #1
LEGAL FUND - To challenge municipalities who refuse to comply with preemption
We have been addressing a preemption violation in Hazle Township, PA. You can find more comprehensive info about the situation here:
http://www.pafoa.org/forum/concealed...rleigh-pa.html (Preemption violation: Hazle TWP park, (Hazleton/Harleigh, PA))
http://www.pafoa.org/forum/concealed...-9-8-08-a.html (ROLL CALL - Hazle Twp. Supervisor's meeting - 9/8/08)
I think this post makes the current situation pretty clear:The supervisors seemed completely disinterested in what we had to say. One challenged my statement that I was "unable" to rent the facility, and asked if I had tried. I told him I did not because the rental agreement required me to agree to the rules, and I would not agree to come without my firearm. He said "the rules are the rules" and that didn't prevent me from renting the pavilion. I then asked if I should simply agree to the rules, then go ahead and bring my firearm anyway. This was not acceptable. He basically said it was my choice, and not their problem if I refused to abide by their rules and would not leave my firearm behind.
The Solicitor was not there, but his son was 'pinch hitting'. He took personal offense from my "sloppy interpretation" comment. Apparently he was the one who came up with it, and fed it to his father for presentation at the last meeting. He then proceeded to give me a mini-quiz on some of the case law. I think he was expecting me to not know them - he was wrong.
On tonight's news report they claim to be "still investigating" and say they don't want to rush into anything. However, last night they made it very clear that there would be no agreement on this issue. In fact, in the last four weeks of their supposed "continuing to look into it", they have been either unable or unwilling to even disclose the exact origins of the rule, and whether or not it is actually backed by an ordinance.
After the meeting, I asked the solicitor what would happen if I proceeded directly to the park. He just shrugged his shoulders. I then asked how someone who was not involved in this debate and just happened by the park would be aware of this rule, since it was not posted anywhere at the park. Again, he just shrugged his shoulders.
I believe it is very clear that they will continue to drag this out in an attempt to get us to go away. They have proven that "continuing to look into it" = NOTHING. Rich and I intend to immediately begin collecting funds so that we can challenge the township in court. We strongly believe that our position is correct, and believe that they are pushing to this extent with the belief that we will not follow through.
Since we are raising funds for two different 'causes', please be sure to specify when you donate.
One fund is for individuals who we believe were unjustifiably charged/revoked/denied/etc., and the other is for legal action against municipalities who refuse to recognize preemption (but only after first attempting to correct the issue by bringing it to their attention in a more gentle manner). Additionally, there is the possibility that one fund may be collecting for multiple individuals or cases at the same time.
If you wish to make a single donation, and split between multiple situations, that's fine, just let us know how you'd like the money divided. Any leftover monies in these funds will be held for future incidents of similar nature. Funds will not be swapped from one cause to the other. Funds that are unspecified may be used for either fund at the discretion of Rich and Greg.
PayPal: gnbrotz AT embarqmail DOT com
Mail donations to:
Greg Rotz
1508 Guilford Station Rd.
Chambersburg, PA 17202
As stated before, an accounting of all monies collected and disbursed will be provided to any donor (absent personal information).
Funds collected so far: $279.38 (last updated 9/23/08)Last edited by gnbrotz; September 23rd, 2008 at 03:26 PM.
Get your "Guns Save Lives" stickers today! PM for more info.
-
September 9th, 2008, 08:46 PM #2
Re: LEGAL FUND - To challenge municipalities who refuse to comply with preemption
I understand the exigencies of the two pending cases, but I was wondering if there was an attorney amongst the PAFOA membership willing to assist in forming a 501(c)(3) defense fund.
I will PM you since I am sending a donation to be split equally between the two cases.Last edited by 5711-Marine; September 11th, 2008 at 07:02 AM.
Of every one hundred men in battle, ten should not even be there. Eighty, are nothing but targets. Nine are the real fighters, we are lucky to have them since they make the battle. Ah, but the one—one is the Warrior—and he brings the others home. —Heracletus
-
September 9th, 2008, 08:55 PM #3
Re: LEGAL FUND - To challenge municipalities who refuse to comply with preemption
payday is Friday. Youll have my donation then.
Wherever this place is that the post refers to, when we win, can we have a BBQ there ?
-
September 9th, 2008, 09:04 PM #4
-
September 9th, 2008, 09:06 PM #5
Re: LEGAL FUND - To challenge municipalities who refuse to comply with preemption
Get your "Guns Save Lives" stickers today! PM for more info.
-
September 9th, 2008, 09:07 PM #6
Re: LEGAL FUND - To challenge municipalities who refuse to comply with preemption
Incorrect PayPal address corrected.
Get your "Guns Save Lives" stickers today! PM for more info.
-
September 9th, 2008, 09:25 PM #7
Re: LEGAL FUND - To challenge municipalities who refuse to comply with preemption
Of every one hundred men in battle, ten should not even be there. Eighty, are nothing but targets. Nine are the real fighters, we are lucky to have them since they make the battle. Ah, but the one—one is the Warrior—and he brings the others home. —Heracletus
-
September 10th, 2008, 12:32 AM #8
Re: LEGAL FUND - To challenge municipalities who refuse to comply with preemption
Aside from the text in the OP(Which left me wondering what was going on), is there a thread somewhere with a background story for this?
Obviously I missed something, and I'm sure others are just as puzzled.I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!
-
September 10th, 2008, 12:49 AM #9
Re: LEGAL FUND - To challenge municipalities who refuse to comply with preemption
-
September 10th, 2008, 06:34 AM #10
Similar Threads
-
[CLOSED]Municipalities in violation of §6120 (Preemption)[CLOSED]
By gnbrotz in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 275Last Post: October 12th, 2010, 04:28 PM -
What's the diff. between refusing to consent and refusing to comply?
By BerksCountyDave in forum GeneralReplies: 6Last Post: April 23rd, 2008, 01:56 PM -
Anyone hear of a successful legal challenge to the regulation of maching guns?
By liberty556 in forum GeneralReplies: 40Last Post: February 21st, 2008, 07:16 PM -
A new legal fund?
By rwilson452 in forum GeneralReplies: 29Last Post: January 17th, 2008, 10:20 PM -
NBC10 Poll: Should municipalities be allowed to enact their own gun laws?
By crffl in forum GeneralReplies: 49Last Post: November 22nd, 2007, 07:29 AM
Bookmarks