Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ford City, PA, Pennsylvania
    (Armstrong County)
    Posts
    773
    Rep Power
    16927248

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Mk19s for everyone

    Problem solved

    Danhr for President 2020.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Next to the Corn
    Posts
    3,833
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    I wonder how many personnel they are willing to lose when the poly cased ammo melts in the chamber and turns the rifle into a paperweight. Even more so now that they want to field more select fire rifles.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Sarver, Pennsylvania
    (Butler County)
    Posts
    677
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Quote Originally Posted by dkf View Post
    I wonder how many personnel they are willing to lose when the poly cased ammo melts in the chamber and turns the rifle into a paperweight. Even more so now that they want to field more select fire rifles.
    Just because they toy with certain ideas doesnt mean they will certainly get around to implementing it. Many military proposals never make it past the testing ground, or take years of improvments done in the lab to finally meet expectations.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,867
    Rep Power
    11765941

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Quote Originally Posted by dkf View Post
    I wonder how many personnel they are willing to lose when the poly cased ammo melts in the chamber and turns the rifle into a paperweight. Even more so now that they want to field more select fire rifles.
    Depends on the polymer. I've had Magpul's polymer front sights mounted directly on railed gas blocks without any issue - and those gas blocks get HOT.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Next to the Corn
    Posts
    3,833
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaran_X View Post
    Depends on the polymer. I've had Magpul's polymer front sights mounted directly on railed gas blocks without any issue - and those gas blocks get HOT.
    You didn't get it that hot then. There is reason it is recommended to NOT mount those plastic sights on railed gas blocks. The fill helps but most of these polymers they use are some kind of filled Nylon 6 which softens well below its melting point. Not mention the lack of dimensional stability you see with most "polymers". You should try to machine some of the plastics out there and hold any kind of decent tolerances with it. I've had plastic parts I've made expand several thousandths just from handling them.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Park, Pennsylvania
    (York County)
    Posts
    1,022
    Rep Power
    14849547

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Quote Originally Posted by Koli01 View Post
    The original caliber of the Garand was .276 or 7 mm.
    Actually no, it is not. A 7mm uses a .284 bullet. Done enough reloading to know the difference.

    Yes the round was called the .276 Pederson since back in those days the English speaking world didn't do metric anything. I think I remember reading a Phil Sharpe book where the army gave DCM thousands of free rounds to try in a couple of preproduction Garands at Camp Perry in the early 30s when they were set to roll the cartridge out as the official service round. These days you'd be hard pressed to even find an advanced cartridge collector who even has an solitary example of the cartridge.

    Either way, the point is that 6.5 or 6.8mm, the US military's flirtation is not a new thing.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,867
    Rep Power
    11765941

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Quote Originally Posted by dkf View Post
    You didn't get it that hot then. There is reason it is recommended to NOT mount those plastic sights on railed gas blocks. The fill helps but most of these polymers they use are some kind of filled Nylon 6 which softens well below its melting point. Not mention the lack of dimensional stability you see with most "polymers". You should try to machine some of the plastics out there and hold any kind of decent tolerances with it. I've had plastic parts I've made expand several thousandths just from handling them.
    http://www.differencebetween.info/di...ic-and-polymer

    Plastic is a type of polymer, but all polymers are not plastic. There are plenty of high heat tolerant polymers out there.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Next to the Corn
    Posts
    3,833
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaran_X View Post
    http://www.differencebetween.info/di...ic-and-polymer

    Plastic is a type of polymer, but all polymers are not plastic. There are plenty of high heat tolerant polymers out there.
    Congrats you can google. Look I've made and developed parts with high dollar exotic plastics and composites that you wouldn't even know to google. "High Heat" and polymers, plastics, etc is an oxy moron. You don't know what ya don't know.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,867
    Rep Power
    11765941

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Quote Originally Posted by dkf View Post
    Congrats you can google. Look I've made and developed parts with high dollar exotic plastics and composites that you wouldn't even know to google. "High Heat" and polymers, plastics, etc is an oxy moron. You don't know what ya don't know.
    So what you're claiming is that there doesn't exist a polymer that can handle the temperature of the chamber of a firearm?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Next to the Corn
    Posts
    3,833
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: SOCOM looks to ditch 7.62

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaran_X View Post
    So what you're claiming is that there doesn't exist a polymer that can handle the temperature of the chamber of a firearm?
    Temperature is only ONE of factors here to making a casing that will hold up to and perform as well as a current brass casing. A chamber temperature could be -50 degrees F to over 500 degrees F depending on the conditions.
    Last edited by dkf; April 20th, 2017 at 07:02 PM.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. ditch
    By edritchey in forum Feedback
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 1st, 2023, 09:00 PM
  2. Ditch Water II - Appleseed Training
    By lprgcFrank in forum Training, Tactics & Competition
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 26th, 2008, 12:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •