Results 1 to 10 of 15
Thread: .308 load question.
-
March 4th, 2017, 05:25 PM #1Active Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
-
S,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 121
- Rep Power
- 1962
.308 load question.
Disclaimer: I'm a semi novice reloader.
I have a hundred .308 primed cases reasy to be loaded with Varget and Hornady 150 gr interlock #3031. Looking at my handbooks Hornadys data seems way off! They list a 35.9 start, 44.9 max. Lyman and Lee list 42.5 and 44, both list 47 max. I'd love to start at 44 grain min. What are your thoughts?
-
March 4th, 2017, 05:48 PM #2
Re: .308 load question.
From Hogdon's web site; https://www.hodgdon.com/varget/
Cartridge: 308 Winchester
CASE Winchester
TWIST 1:12"
PRIMER Federal 210M, Large Rifle Match
BARREL LENGTH 15"
TRIM LENGTH 2.005"
BULLET WEIGHT 150 GR. NOS BT
MANUFACTURER Hodgdon
POWDER Varget
BULLET DIAM. .308"
C.O.L. 2.800"
STARTING LOADS
GRS. 44.0
VEL.(FT/S) 2,522
PRESS 43,300 CUP
MAXIMUM LOADS
GRS. 47.0C
VEL.(FT/S) 2,675
PRESS 50,300 CUP
I don't know that the interlock bullet should be that much different from the boat tail listed here. What version of the Hornady Manual do you have?
The Hornady website is useless for checking this. The Lyman numbers sound like a happy medium.Last edited by gghbi; March 4th, 2017 at 06:29 PM.
-
March 4th, 2017, 05:54 PM #3Super Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2016
- Location
-
Out There,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 534
- Rep Power
- 7468636
Re: .308 load question.
You're ok to start at 44gr if you want. I have a older Speer book that lists a max of 47gr. It also notes that the 47gr is a compressed load. I don't mess with compressed loads personally(neither does Hornady I guess) but its published in several sources soooo it's up to you.
-
March 4th, 2017, 07:31 PM #4Active Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
-
S,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 121
- Rep Power
- 1962
-
March 4th, 2017, 08:33 PM #5Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
-
'burbs,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 788
- Rep Power
- 21474847
Re: .308 load question.
I've loaded that specific bullet with Varget. My chronied results matched Hornady's data very closely. There's no way I'd start at near max with any load. Especially for a novice reloader. Will you chrony results? Do you know how to recognize pressure signs?
The Hodgdon data listed above is for a Nosler BT. That's a different bullet than the Hornady 3031. The Hodgdon data that indicates 2522 fps for the Nosler BT at 44g Varget will be pushing the Hornady close to 2700 fps with the same powder load.
Don't do it. Start low and work up.Last edited by frankski; March 4th, 2017 at 08:39 PM. Reason: additional data
-
March 4th, 2017, 10:32 PM #6Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 2,864
- Rep Power
- 21474851
Re: .308 load question.
Why are you eager to start with the highest starting load? Just because it is more powder doesn't mean you'll get better performance.
-
March 5th, 2017, 03:20 AM #7
Re: .308 load question.
At least part of the difference in the load data may come from the COLs used. Hodgdon tested their 150gr bullets at 2.800" while Hornady #9 lists 2.735" as the COL for the Interlock bullets.
Note that Hornady lists all of the cannelured bullets at COLs less than 2.800, probably to allow for crimping at the cannelure.
If you are going to seat (and perhaps crimp) at the cannelure, I'd use Hornady's data and start at 43gr, working up. You can check for pressure signs and see how far you can go if need be. Alternatively, seat longer and follow the rest of Hodgdon's guidance as well.
-
March 5th, 2017, 11:18 AM #8Grand Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
-
Tioga County,
Pennsylvania
(Tioga County) - Posts
- 4,959
- Rep Power
- 21474852
Re: .308 load question.
To me it makes sense to start first with a manufacturers data for that particular bullet. For instance if it's a Hornady bullet I am using I start with their own data for that bullet and then tweak it to my needs. I would also invest in a chronograph as that gives you a data point to work with. There is nothing wrong with starting on the low end of the scale and working up. A lot of times I will find a compromise in the middle and work from there.
-
March 5th, 2017, 11:42 AM #9Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
-
Richboro,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 3,058
- Rep Power
- 21474851
Re: .308 load question.
The more recent Hornady manuals are worthless if you are looking for anything close to a max load. They group every bullet they make by weight and give one load for all of them. My manual shows for .308 they group 7 bullets together (including the 3031) from 150 to 155 gr. To make it worse they overlap everything from a standard soft point, blunt round nose, boat tails, and the long A-max bullets. There is no way the one load will be the same max for all of those.
What you get is a good load for one of the bullets (the highest pressure one) and a moderate load for the rest. You are better off using a powder companies data with a generic bullet and working up slow.
Also, The recent Hornady manuals (like most others) are getting more and more conservative compared their older manuals (pre-lawyer versions).Last edited by Delkal; March 5th, 2017 at 11:48 AM.
-
March 5th, 2017, 12:50 PM #10Active Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
-
S,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 121
- Rep Power
- 1962
Re: .308 load question.
It's more the discrepancy between Hornady and my other manuals that gets me. It seems like a waste of time starting 8 grain below the other manuals. I'm not shooting a .308 150 2300 fps... I don't care if it's a 0 moa load. I would like to be in the 2700 fps area and have a 1 moa load. That would accomplish my "energy minimum" to 300 yards.
Similar Threads
-
Question on dialling in on a load
By WWGunslinger in forum Ammunition & ReloadingReplies: 15Last Post: February 5th, 2017, 04:21 PM -
General load/choke question
By omgur2 in forum ShotgunsReplies: 11Last Post: November 21st, 2014, 01:50 PM -
Question on load for .45, 230G, xtp h.p.
By okinawanfighter in forum Ammunition & ReloadingReplies: 5Last Post: August 3rd, 2010, 08:19 PM -
Question about reducing the OAL on a 9mm load
By BerksCountyDave in forum Ammunition & ReloadingReplies: 3Last Post: January 4th, 2010, 12:56 PM -
AR load development question
By ah141nj in forum GeneralReplies: 24Last Post: December 26th, 2009, 01:38 AM
Bookmarks