Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    4,879
    Rep Power
    21474857

    Question 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    A thought popped into my head a few days ago to get my dad a fairly nice Christmas present at a fairly low cost: load him up some 38's for his Ruger. I don't shoot .38 myself but I keep the dies around because I have a couple of friends who do and I've loaded for them a couple of times as a gift/favor to trade. The objectives are accuracy and mild recoil--I know it can be like a .22 when you want it to be. I wish I could have time to work up a load but he'll be at the house on Thanksgiving. What's to know about the difference between 148gr WC's and 158gr SWC, generally speaking? If I don't know what his gun likes, generally is one more accurate than the other? I gather wadcutters in 38 were considered the gold standard for a long time, but I don't know if that's a thing of the past because other stuff is out there, or if it's just a specialist's round. Wadcutter has range limitations b/c of un-aerodynamic shape, right, or no? I'll consider cast lead, coated, or plated, having seen good options in all of them. Thoughts? I have Titegroup, Universal, Unique, and WST to work with.
    "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws--that's insane!" -- Penn Jillette

    "To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." -- Ted Nugent

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    5,440
    Rep Power
    16969193

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    Wad Cutters are just that...wadcutters. They make a nice round easy to see hole in paper. To the best of my knowledge they serve no other purpose. Semi-wadcutters are similar except they don't produce the same clean hole of the WC. IIRC, Semi-WC's design was to improve feeding in semi-autos (specifically the 1911).
    Toujours prêt

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Milford, Pennsylvania
    (Pike County)
    Posts
    752
    Rep Power
    3874738

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yellowfin View Post
    Thoughts? I have Titegroup, Universal, Unique, and WST to work with.
    The classic bullseye load is 2.7 or 2.8gr of Bullseye under a 148gr HBWC. Super accurate and mouse-fart levels of recoil.

    With the powders you have listed, you'd be looking at around 3.0gr of TG or 3.2gr of W231. +/- to suit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Piney twp, Pennsylvania
    (Clarion County)
    Posts
    1,633
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    I've shot some wadcutters and cast SWC, full, and HBWC's for .38 and .44. As Hawk mentions they were very popular with target shooters but they have various uses. The SWC is popular with cast hunters usually worshipping at the alter of men like Elmer Keith. WC's were also used in self defense loads. If you care do a search on the "FBI load". I've found this to be an interesting article on WC's and defense: http://www.grantcunningham.com/2011/...rge-wadcutter/
    If it were me I'd go with the good all around SWC loaded at cowboy action levels. Hodgdon has data online for most of the powders you mention. These will be mild mid loads. If I wanted to get into minimal loads I'd really want to have the firearm to test them with.
    The only powder you mention that I've worked with is Unique. With my 6" S&W .38 special 3.5 grs will go about 650 fps over the chromo.
    At milder loads I'd want a softer cast than most produce like a 12 bhn from Missori bullets or a powder coated one.
    Paging Ducati Ron. He's a member here who's in the business at http://www.steelvalleycasting.com
    Not affiliated but he gives good info.
    Last edited by cephas; October 29th, 2016 at 08:54 AM. Reason: fps
    It ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Milford, Pennsylvania
    (Pike County)
    Posts
    752
    Rep Power
    3874738

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    It should also be mentioned that you want to avoid any/all flake powders with the auto-disk measure.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Burgettstown, Pennsylvania
    (Washington County)
    Age
    72
    Posts
    1,008
    Rep Power
    13086164

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    My wife has a LCR which I load for. I am currently loading 148 hollow based wad cutters for. The are really accurate because the base expands to seal the rifling even using a small powder charge. I loaded Bullseye, but found I got better consistency with Trail Boss because it fills the case better. Trail Boss was developed for the Cowboy shooting because they wanted a powder that less position sensitive.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    1,060
    Rep Power
    4672406

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    Quote Originally Posted by RobW View Post
    The classic bullseye load is 2.7 or 2.8gr of Bullseye under a 148gr HBWC. Super accurate and mouse-fart levels of recoil.

    With the powders you have listed, you'd be looking at around 3.0gr of TG or 3.2gr of W231. +/- to suit.
    Agree in spades. If you load them as mentioned and put the bullet in until about 0.5 mm protrudes and then crimp, you have the classic load for the S&W 52. My two, if I do my job correctly will cloverleaf at 10 metres. Dave_n

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Chester, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    600
    Rep Power
    3782723

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    Agree with all of the above. Wadcutters can be super accurate at low velocity. SWC also punch a relatively clean hole in paper.

    The biggest advantage of SWC vs. wadcutters in a revolver is speed of reloading. If shooting bullseye and reloading doesn't matter full wadcutters are the way to go, however, if you are having to do any 'tactical' reloading the shape of the SWC guides the rounds in so much faster. It takes me about 2x or more to reload using speedloaders as the wadcutters harder to line up.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Whitehall, Pennsylvania
    (Lehigh County)
    Posts
    155
    Rep Power
    4893919

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    I've got a couple hundred Inverted WCs that were police ammo, if I'm not mistaken. These are 148 grains and are more accurate than I thought they'd be. I honestly don't know the advantage or benefits of an Inverted WC over a WC but I imagine there must be some since these were police ammo. Good luck with your project. It sounds like he'll really like getting WC ammo. I would...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Ambridge, Pennsylvania
    (Beaver County)
    Posts
    2,380
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: 38 special: WC vs. SWC?

    My favorite is a HBWC (hollow base wad cutter) loaded upside down. Makes for a great cheap cast hollowpoint bullet. Driven at the correct speed they will open up like a trumpet.
    www.Steelvalleycasting.com is your new home for coated bullets and custom ammo.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 44 special help
    By TheChairmanH2K in forum Ammunition & Reloading
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: May 1st, 2015, 10:24 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: May 6th, 2012, 08:12 PM
  3. Colt Detective Special v. S&W Chief's Special
    By FCRPhila in forum Pistols
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: November 16th, 2010, 10:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •