Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    4,448
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Is there any more detail on how the notification is suppose to happen? I know with a C&R a simple letter sent was enough but I don't think there is any mechanism to make sure they got it, if it was lost in the mail or if it was never sent.

    Overall I think this is good news for so many that had to deal with their local CLEO. If the cost was to have those with a Trust go through a background check I'm not opposed to paying it.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    NEPA, Pennsylvania
    (Wyoming County)
    Posts
    2,320
    Rep Power
    21474849

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Quote Originally Posted by phillyd2 View Post
    Is there any more detail on how the notification is suppose to happen? I know with a C&R a simple letter sent was enough but I don't think there is any mechanism to make sure they got it, if it was lost in the mail or if it was never sent.

    Overall I think this is good news for so many that had to deal with their local CLEO. If the cost was to have those with a Trust go through a background check I'm not opposed to paying it.
    I get a little confused over some of this legal mumbo jumbo.

    Let's start with background check. PICS/NICS is a background check. Unless I'm mistaken a trust/corp is(or was) technically exempt from having a PICS check done although each time I bought a silencer the Dealer ran a PICS on me despite the fact that I was using a Trust.

    Okay moving on....why the fingerprints/photgraphs are needed to do a BGC on NFA items is beyond my comprehension?
    "It seems that the Constitution is more or less guidelines than actual rules"
    My feedback: http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=305685

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    4,448
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Quote Originally Posted by ExFlyinguy View Post
    I get a little confused over some of this legal mumbo jumbo.

    Let's start with background check. PICS/NICS is a background check. Unless I'm mistaken a trust/corp is(or was) technically exempt from having a PICS check done although each time I bought a silencer the Dealer ran a PICS on me despite the fact that I was using a Trust.

    Okay moving on....why the fingerprints/photgraphs are needed to do a BGC on NFA items is beyond my comprehension?
    I've never done a trust but ATF must use NIC, not PICS. Why your local dealer ran PICS I have no clue.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    172
    Rep Power
    449340

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Quote Originally Posted by pyld View Post
    The filing is hilarious. They got 12. Literally like 12 of something north of 100k responses that were in support of the draft rule. 11 of those were likely Valarie Jarret.
    I heard, apparently, that the ATF is bringing in another 200 agents ... we'll see.
    Quote Originally Posted by ExFlyinguy View Post
    Okay moving on....why the fingerprints/photgraphs are needed to do a BGC on NFA items is beyond my comprehension?
    Does anything the ATF does make sense?
    Quote Originally Posted by phillyd2 View Post
    I've never done a trust but ATF must use NIC, not PICS. Why your local dealer ran PICS I have no clue.
    Sounds like maybe said dealer tried to make a few bucks.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    NEPA, Pennsylvania
    (Wyoming County)
    Posts
    2,320
    Rep Power
    21474849

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Quote Originally Posted by Thompson View Post
    I heard, apparently, that the ATF is bringing in another 200 agents ... we'll see.

    Does anything the ATF does make sense?

    Sounds like maybe said dealer tried to make a few bucks.
    Dealer doesn't make any money on background check...they are charged by the PSP for the process and have to remit what they collect to PSP. It may have been a CYA SOP for that dealer. That being said $5 isn't a big deal to me, and as I mentioned I'm not 100% sure if the BGC was or wasn't required.

    And "NO" IMHO the ATF and NFA don't make much sense.
    "It seems that the Constitution is more or less guidelines than actual rules"
    My feedback: http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=305685

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    172
    Rep Power
    449340

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Quote Originally Posted by ExFlyinguy View Post
    Dealer doesn't make any money on background check...they are charged by the PSP for the process and have to remit what they collect to PSP.
    Ohhhh. Did not know that. I always thought dealers just tacked that on for "convenience"

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Bucks, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    13,646
    Rep Power
    21474867

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Quote Originally Posted by Thompson View Post
    . . .

    Sounds like maybe said dealer tried to make a few bucks.
    I advise my dealer clients to run PICS if there's any question at all. Dealers have been sued for not magically "knowing" somehow that a person intended to misuse a firearm, or intended to sell it, even if they passed PICS. There are powerful forces out there, looking to make precedents and hurt the firearms industry, and they will happily stoop to attacking some one-man FFL. In fact, they prefer it, because the legal defense will be easier to overcome.

    Here's an example of douchebags frivolously suing the gun industry, goaded on by the usual suspects:

    "Sandy and Lonnie Phillips, whose daughter, Jessica Ghawi, was one of 12 people killed in the July 2012 attack, had sued four online retailers that provided bullets, gun magazines and body armor alleged to have been used in the shooting. They accused the retailers of selling the items without concern about the mental fitness of the buyer or the items' intended use."

    http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_27...t-against-ammo

    The defendants won, but it cost them a lot, even with the fee-shifting for some of them.

    The cost to the purchaser of undergoing PICS is small; the cost to a dealer of being sued for that 1 time out of 1,000 that something goes sideways, is huge, probably crippling. Taking the extra step of running PICS on an NFA transfer is basic self-defense.
    Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
    Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Acme, Pennsylvania
    (Westmoreland County)
    Posts
    78
    Rep Power
    589638

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    I have a question that I am sure has been answered elsewhere and I believe that I already know the answer but since the question of whether or not a trust is worth it anymore I will ask. If I go through the process, as an individual, to purchase a suppressor and/or sbr am I the ONLY person that is allowed to use/touch/look at/think about it? Or, is my wife/child/parent/brother/friend able to fire off a few shots at the range with my sbr/suppressor? Is there a clear understanding of this available?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    NEPA, Pennsylvania
    (Wyoming County)
    Posts
    2,320
    Rep Power
    21474849

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Quote Originally Posted by splink View Post
    I have a question that I am sure has been answered elsewhere and I believe that I already know the answer but since the question of whether or not a trust is worth it anymore I will ask. If I go through the process, as an individual, to purchase a suppressor and/or sbr am I the ONLY person that is allowed to use/touch/look at/think about it? Or, is my wife/child/parent/brother/friend able to fire off a few shots at the range with my sbr/suppressor? Is there a clear understanding of this available?
    I'm not a lawyer, but non-prohibited person(s) can use the item in your presence, but if you go so does the item. HTH.
    "It seems that the Constitution is more or less guidelines than actual rules"
    My feedback: http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=305685

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    USN Retired, Pennsylvania
    (Monroe County)
    Posts
    4,069
    Rep Power
    21474856

    Default Re: ATF Rule 41F finalized--CLEO signoff removed, everyone on trust must get BG check

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaran_X View Post
    They can't refuse to accept the notification. If you're worried about that, just mail it to your CLEO through Certified Mail with a signature required. Once the letter is signed for by the CLEO office, submit your Forms to the FBI and BATFE. If the CLEO tries to raise a ruckus, show that the notification was signed for by his office - as legally required under the law.
    Tell tht to some of the sheriffs around here.
    Owner Trigger Time LLc 01 FFL/NFA Saylorsburg, PA. Sales/Service/Transfers/Training
    NRA CRSO/Pistol/Rifle/Shotgun inst. BSA Rifle/Shotgun Merit badge counselor. US Navy Marksmanship Team Staff

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Cleo signoff in Philadelphia
    By Steve2125 in forum Philadelphia
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 23rd, 2013, 09:57 AM
  2. CLEO signoff, current Sheriff?
    By fullBATTLErattL in forum Luzerne
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 9th, 2012, 03:16 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 4th, 2008, 12:33 AM
  4. cleo signoff/aow question
    By idpasharpshooter in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 4th, 2008, 07:57 PM
  5. Form 1 CLEO Signoff in Lackawanna
    By Beelsr in forum General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 18th, 2006, 08:43 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •