Use of deadly force question

[father-of-five]

It could be a "domestic" situation, which can bring about significant if not numerous complications.

[louie]

Turn the hose on 'em!

(It works for copulating dogs.)

[wanneroo]

Draw your weapon, aim it at them, then clear your throat to get their attention and proclaim, authoritatively, "Gentlemen, I am audio and videotaping this for my youtube channel. Please give us a good show as I stand to make serious coin here and I need the cash to purchase ammo for the upcoming PAFOA Group Shoot. As an incentive, I am going to shoot one of you when the fight ends. The loser gets shot. Fight accordingly".


Then post the link to your youtube channel here for our viewing pleasure.

Ok, for the 'reality challenged' among the readers of this post, I AM KIDDING!!!!

EDIT to add: somebody rep me. I gotta get that 666 out of my rep count. I won't be able to sleep tonight with that in there!!

I can't rep you anymore. As always you have some of the best responses.

[streaker69]

Turn the hose on 'em!

(It works for copulating dogs.)

That's called breaking it up, doggie style.

[ungawa]

It would be justified only if you were wearing your Batman uniform.

Get real, you carry to defend yourself, its called SELF-defense. You are not a vigilante.

Nonsense, but your choice.

I agree with others, the problem with the situation is you don't know what is going on. I almost intervened on a guy trying to steal a woman's purse and then beating her when she wouldn't let go. By the time I got there they were embracing and kissing. Had I got there sooner, both of them might have opened fire on me for all I know.

Also, the idea of using deadly force to break up a fight does not seem productive, especially when you don't know what is going on. Unless one guy is doing something to the other that will obviously kill him.

People say 80% of fights end up on the ground. Well, as sprrdhawk44 alluded to, there is a downside to going to the ground. You can usually only handle one shithead at a time. If it gets that bad, Field Goal.

[streaker69]

Recent related situation: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015...-carry-holder/

[wanneroo]

Most likely the thread starter is from psycho mommies demand action and is trolling for mayor doomberg. They start threads like this to generate responses to somehow fulfill their fantasies that gun owners are deranged people ready to drop the hammer on anyone. In reality those people are the quacks and gun owners I find are some of the most responsible and sensible people around.

[LorDiego01]

0

[streaker69]

Most likely the thread starter is from psycho mommies demand action and is trolling for mayor doomberg. They start threads like this to generate responses to somehow fulfill their fantasies that gun owners are deranged people ready to drop the hammer on anyone. In reality those people are the quacks and gun owners I find are some of the most responsible and sensible people around.

Damn, those Damned mom's must be friggen psychic then, cause the user signed up several years before they even formed up. The user even went so far as to throw us off the track by engaging in commerce on the site.

[ungawa]

Damn, those Damned mom's must be friggen psychic then, cause the user signed up several years before they even formed up. The user even went so far as to throw us off the track by engaging in commerce on the site.

Well, it took Everytown years to setup before the Connecticut shooting. If you've ever read that story. Two weeks and they had chapters in 50 states, 50,000 (or whatever) members, and had been on every nation news program. Based solely on a face book page with 12 posts and no content that didn't turn up in a google search.