Results 1 to 10 of 26
-
March 30th, 2015, 07:30 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Location
-
Lehigh Valley,
Pennsylvania
(Lehigh County) - Posts
- 5
- Rep Power
- 0
First concealed carry pistol purchase
Hey everybody,
Just got my LTCF and I'm looking for my first pistol for concealed carry. My online research led me to the S&W MP 9 Shield. I checked out my local gun shop and the Shield feels nice, but the Ruger LC9 also piqued my interest. It feels lighter and smaller (which it is, but only by a very small margin). More research made me seriously consider the LC9S version. I have access to a Shield that I can shoot. Can anyone give pros/cons for the LC9S and Shield 9? The number one reason for purchase is CC self defense. Fun at the range is a far distant second.
-
March 30th, 2015, 07:49 PM #2
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
Take a look at the CW9 as well. Very similar in size and price. Its also what I decided on among your choices.
If you do go down the LC9 route make sure you look at the LC9s or LC9s PRO.
Link to the whole thread from the above quotes.
http://forum.pafoa.org/concealed-ope...ruger-lc9.html"No, it's just a machine. I'm the weapon." - Jack Harper in Oblivion
-
March 30th, 2015, 07:50 PM #3
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
IBTG43.
Of those two, the Shield. Hands down.There's no such thing as a free lunch.
-
March 30th, 2015, 08:02 PM #4
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
I agree with the above statement. I have shot both and own only the Shield in 9mm and regret giving it too my wife. The Ruger isnt bad for what it is but the Shield is great at everything which is rare for a smaller concealed carry pistol.
The prices are way down on these right now in the $325.00 to $350.00 range and they also come with 2 mag's as compared to the 1 Ruger gives you and at $30.00 to $40.00 a POP any small difference in purchase price is going to be lost right there.
The shield also offers better sites and no other nanny state features other then an optional thumb safety if you choose that model. The LC9s Pro is also offered which excludes all nanny state features Ruger has to offer.
The LC9s has a nice trigger as compared to the orig DAO and may possibly be just a tad bit crisper then the Shield but it's not enough to change my mind over the greatness of that S&W. I realize I am coming off as a S&W Fan Boy and to show I am not I currently edc a Glock 26 and all of my other purposed pistols are Glocks, but If I was only going to own 1 pistol for both HD, SD and normal every day range plinking it would be a Shield upgraded TFX sights.
Fanboy speech over.
-
March 30th, 2015, 08:28 PM #5
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
I did not care for the Ruger LC9, but the LC9S and the LC9S pro are much better, IMHO, with very nice triggers. I would have been happy with either, or the Kahr CW9, which ended up being my second choice, but I bought and carry a Shield 9mm. It feels like more gun to me, although all 3 are virtually identical in size. I do not regret my decision at all. A lot of people, more experienced than I am, seem to agree.
My goal in Life is to become the kind of problem that people throw money at.
-
March 30th, 2015, 09:35 PM #6
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
I have the shield for when my g19 is too big and I love it! I bought 2 extra mags from magcommander online for like $25 a piece and an appendix IWB from blade tech and it has been awesome with no problems whatsoever.
Go head, skin it. Skin that smoke wagon and see what happens.
-
March 30th, 2015, 10:08 PM #7Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
-
Narberth,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Age
- 81
- Posts
- 588
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
I am going to piss odd some critics of the Lc9 with my post, but here goes.
I bought an Lc9 and found it OK from a size/weight perspective. It is a double action hammer fired pistol, and that means a longer trigger pull, and that means not being nervous and jerky in a firefight. With lot's of experience with an M1911 in Nam, I had no problem adapting to the Lc9. It has 3 safety features so it is a good gun for the inexperienced. The M1911 had 3 safeties too, but they were different from those of the Lc9. The Lc9s had has the same safety features as the Lc9 but has a better trigger pull. Now there is the Lc9s Pro that has only a trigger pull safety. That makes it a faster shooter but more dangerous for the inexperienced shooter. I now carry the Lc9s Pro, and keep the Lc9 in my night table drawer.
The Lc9 series guns are reliable and accurate. With the right ammo they will drop an aggressor. If you are an experienced gun handler, then the Lc9s Pro is the best choice. Otherwise, I think the Lc9s is best.
The original Lc9 and the Lc9s pro require gun handling experience for different reasons, but the Lc9 series is a really great set of guns for CC.
If you want to discuss it, PM me. I am not going to get into an online debate with those who have different opinions.
-
March 30th, 2015, 10:17 PM #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Location
-
Lehigh Valley,
Pennsylvania
(Lehigh County) - Posts
- 5
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
I greatly appreciate the responses so far and as expected the Shield is getting the most nods. I would just like to emphasize that I'm looking more for pros/cons of the two carry pistols than simply what each of you would choose. I'd like to know why you all have or would choose one over the other. Cyclops, Hodgie and QuackXP, your responses are more what I am looking for, extra thanks!
-
March 30th, 2015, 10:59 PM #9
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
Different opinions are great they bring up things that others may have never considered or thought of in the past. Online pissing matches are because of close minded morons who cant get past the brand name rather then learn something or except the fact that there actually maybe something better then what they have out there.
I should have added more about my personal use of the LC9 after firing it. The DAO trigger sucks when compared to DAO offerings from other brands such as Kahr or Sig. It's fairly light and snappy epically with +P ammunition so it will not be very easy for a lot of shooters especially ones used to striker fired pistols to remain on target after their 1st shot. Mixed with the smallish sights and that kind of ended it's deal for me.
As far as the LC9s the trigger is great and it makes up for all short comings in the LC9 standard including the sights which may just be my personal opinion. So what we had to look at when considering one for my wife VS the shield was shootability, build quality, after market upgrades and comfort.
Now I was unable to shoot the LC9s so did not get the pleasure of firing rounds down range with that trigger but the standard pistol did have a fair amount of recoil compared to the Shield that's not going to change with a different trigger, and after getting the DAO trigger down I could honestly say I wouldn't be taking it to the range for a plinker day very often.
Build quality well I see no major issues with either or in 9mm being reported on the interweb so that's a hard one to compare. From inspecting, firing, and handling both they both appear to be made well with no really obvious cut corners.
After market upgrades for the shield are there, ton's of offering in sights, .40's can be down converted to 9mm and mag's are easy to come by. I have not seen much as far as night sights offered for the LC9, I have not gone out of my way to look specifically for them but going through sight manufactures lists when it hits Ruger it's typically the SR series of pistols that are being made.
Over all comfort and value I give it to the Shield and so did my wife and please believe me I wanted her to get a LC9s mainly because I wanted to keep my Shield for me and it's always fun to have a new gun in the pistol safe but she was sold on the S&W after the 1st mag was empty. I will also add that it's one of the only pistols I shoot well with the shortened mag inserted in it. Rolling that pinky under the 7 round mag comes natural to me as compared to other offering including my 26 which I shoot rather crapily without an extended magazine.
The Value part is strictly based on cost and I think you would be hard pressed to get a better CC pistol that can double duty as a fun plinker or that one can run a comfortable 500 round 1 day class with for less then $325.00 with 2 mags. The fact that Ruger only provides 1 mag with most of their pistols and rifles really chaps my ass as well as the lack of availability and the $30.00 to $40.00 price they go for from most online retailers, but again that's a personal complaint and has no baring on the quality of the pistol.
Now I have owned a CW9 and I if I had to choose between the LC9s pro and the CW9 I would purchase the Ruger, but that's a different thread for a different day.Last edited by Hodgie; March 30th, 2015 at 11:11 PM.
-
March 31st, 2015, 07:07 AM #10
Re: First concealed carry pistol purchase
I haven't fired a shield, but I've owned an LC9s Pro for a bit now and can tell you that it's awesome. The trigger is very good. It has a long reset, but really works for me. It's been reliable and quite accurate in my hands.
Tanner's in Bucks has Shields w no safety and two mags for 349 right now (if they haven't sold out). That's a better value than the Ruger - but I'm still very happy I went with the Ruger.
Similar Threads
-
Concealed Carry AR-15 Pistol
By eagle63903 in forum Concealed CarryReplies: 7Last Post: July 3rd, 2012, 04:08 PM -
NEW Concealed Carry Pistol :)
By mike_yorkPA in forum PistolsReplies: 16Last Post: June 4th, 2011, 04:37 PM -
Recommend a .40 S&W carry/concealed pistol?
By Fossil4Life in forum PistolsReplies: 78Last Post: March 24th, 2011, 07:06 PM -
Concealed carry. Able to carry my father's pistol?
By anythingmilitarybuff in forum Concealed CarryReplies: 15Last Post: January 15th, 2009, 10:16 PM -
Looking for a Compact Pistol for Concealed Carry
By smores in forum Concealed CarryReplies: 61Last Post: December 24th, 2008, 12:02 AM
Bookmarks