Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
    (Cumberland County)
    Posts
    303
    Rep Power
    298363

    Default California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    (Bloomberg) -- California’s ban on new semiautomatic handguns that don’t stamp identifying information on the cartridge was upheld by a U.S. judge in a major loss for gun-rights groups.

    The law barring sales of handguns without the microstamping technology doesn’t violate the Constitution’s Second Amendment because gun owners don’t have a right to buy specific types of firearms, U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller in Sacramento said in her ruling.

    “Plaintiffs insist they have the right to determine the precise way in which they would exercise their Second Amendment rights,” Mueller said. The insistence upon particular handguns falls “outside the scope of the right to bear arms,” she said.




    California in 2013 became the first state to bar retailers from selling new models of semiautomatic handguns not equipped to imprint the weapon’s make, model and serial number on the cartridge when a bullet is fired. The statute was supported by law enforcement because it can help deter or solve crime.

    Thursday’s ruling that the requirement doesn’t violate the Second Amendment will prompt other states to impose similar requirements, in particular because there’s wide popular support for ballistic fingerprinting, said Allison Anderman, an attorney with the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence in San Francisco.

    “Microstamping is a really important tool for law enforcement,” Anderman said in a phone interview.

    De Facto Ban

    Calguns Foundation Inc. and the Second Amendment Foundation argued that the requirement amounts to a de facto ban on sales of new semiautomatics because several manufacturers said they wouldn’t produce guns that included microstamp technology even if it meant their firearms couldn’t be sold in California, the most populous U.S. state.

    About 1.5 million handguns were legally sold in California since opponents sued in 2009 to block the microstamping requirement, which according to Mueller’s ruling shows that the law doesn’t effectively ban the sale of firearms in the state.

    The District of Columbia, the only other place in the U.S. to mandate microstamping, is set to begin enforcing that requirement next year, Anderman said.

    The two gun rights groups said in a court filing Thursday that they will appeal the ruling by Mueller, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama.

    ‘Strong Case’

    “The court’s reasoning, that California’s prohibition of most handguns doesn’t even implicate the Second Amendment, is interesting,” Alan Gura, a lawyer for the groups, said Friday in an e-mail. “But we’re confident that we have a strong case on appeal.”

    The case may go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 2008 upheld individuals’ right to own handguns, calling them the “quintessential self-defense weapon.”

    The 2008 high court ruling left room for gun-control backers to impose new rules to promote safety. California, New York and Maryland, among other states, enacted restrictions that U.S. gun manufacturers and retailers contend are intended to regulate their $14 billion industry out of business.

    The California law was signed in 2007 by then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, and was put on hold until 2013 when state Attorney General Kamala Harris, a Democrat running for the U.S. Senate next year, determined the technology was available to all gun makers and wasn’t encumbered by patent claims.

    “The court’s ruling means that more gun crimes will be solved, more lives will be saved, and California communities will be safer,” Mike Feuer, the Los Angeles city attorney and the author of the microstamping bill, said in a statement.

    The case is Pena v. Cid, 09-cv-01185, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California (Sacramento).

    To contact the reporter on this story: Edvard Pettersson in Federal court in Los Angeles at

    epettersson@bloomberg.net

    To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net Peter Blumberg


    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...-federal-judge

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The cold, dark, void, Pennsylvania
    (Clearfield County)
    Posts
    4,078
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    “The court’s ruling means that more gun crimes will be solved, more lives will be saved, and California communities will be safer,” Mike Feuer, the Los Angeles city attorney and the author of the microstamping bill, said in a statement.
    Unless criminals use a gun that was stolen, or if criminals use a gun brought in from another state, or if criminals figure out how to use a file.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Bucks County, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    2,428
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    Quote Originally Posted by raxar View Post
    Unless criminals use a gun that was stolen, or if criminals use a gun brought in from another state, or if criminals figure out how to use a file.
    Or order replacement parts online or buy them from a gun show vendor. Personally, I think if we ever see it here, we should all get together and hold 'firing pin swap' parties. That would confound their plan quite well.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Next to the Corn
    Posts
    3,833
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    The law barring sales of handguns without the microstamping technology doesn’t violate the Constitution’s Second Amendment because gun owners don’t have a right to buy specific types of firearms, U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller in Sacramento said in her ruling.
    The right to keep and bear arms pretty much covers "specific types of firearms". Another libtard judge ruling in personal opinion.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Levittown, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    9,654
    Rep Power
    21474860

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    Are we in danger of a final high court ruling that we are only entitled to bear the arms that existed when the 2nd was enacted?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ercildoun, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    5,536
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    An ultra left wing kook.

    Corruption is the default behavior of government officials. JPC

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The land o' cotton, old times there are not forgotten
    Posts
    3,536
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    How do they plan to deal with simple wear from usage?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Northampton County, Pennsylvania
    (Northampton County)
    Posts
    17,641
    Rep Power
    21474870

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    A district ruling is almost like the federal version of traffic court. As noted, just some California wacko. Case needs to be appealed to a real wacko now.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sterling, Pennsylvania
    (Wayne County)
    Posts
    6,044
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    I'm starting a new business, small little adhesive strips to go on bolt face to stop micro stamping. DUMBASS and everyone wants a woman to be President, look at what we have now.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chester County, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    4,514
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: California Cartridge-Microstamp Law Upheld in Gun Group Loss

    Quote Originally Posted by Qtrborecrazy View Post
    I'm starting a new business, small little adhesive strips to go on bolt face to stop micro stamping. DUMBASS and everyone wants a woman to be President, look at what we have now.
    Not all women are far left kooks like this judge. I think law school creates a lot of this mess.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Denial upheld then reversed
    By RussianDave in forum General
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: August 24th, 2022, 09:12 PM
  2. Gun Control Group Braces for Court Loss
    By RugerNiner in forum General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: June 17th, 2008, 12:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •