Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 61
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    1,680
    Rep Power
    17961070

    Default Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    PA, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Posts
    3,604
    Rep Power
    1246703

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    NRANRANRANRA

    God I hate the media

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Yardley, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    2,701
    Rep Power
    21474850

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    My goodness, I can not believe innocent, honest citizens are under such scrutiny and treated as criminals. Then the people that are supposed to uphold the law pick and choose according to their agenda! My goodness, Wolf's not even in office and it's already starting. I really hope the Republican majority fights back and starts prosecuting and playing hardball with this BS...
    Last edited by mikelets456; December 5th, 2014 at 10:16 AM.
    "I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." Thomas Jefferson

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    92
    Rep Power
    31816

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    Regardless of how anyone feels about guns or this particular law, everyone should be outraged by how blatantly political this woman is. She needs to do her job or step down.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Northampton County, Pennsylvania
    (Northampton County)
    Posts
    17,641
    Rep Power
    21474870

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    Half of that article is not true and the other half is 10% truth with the important 90% part hidden.

    It was like the SS told you that your parents were sent to Dachau to help poor people in Europe. And there's more good news, they have new temp jobs!

    Just a huge, long, detailed lie.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Between Heaven and Hell, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,485
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    When will she do her job? She needs to be removed from office.
    A Republic, if you can keep it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    5,920
    Rep Power
    21474857

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Berks_Iraq_Vet View Post
    When will she do her job? She needs to be removed from office.
    She is doing her job, advancing the progressive Libtard agenda.

    Non-citizen Kane needs to go.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    delco, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Posts
    923
    Rep Power
    3958268

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    The inquirer says : "...a new law that effectively stripped municipalities of the right to enact their own gun measures..."

    Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it already against the law for municipalities to enact their own gun measures per the UFA?

    It is amazing to me that an attorney general is allowed to pick and choose which laws they uphold. What would happen if we allowed cops to do the same?
    Quote Originally Posted by internet troll View Post
    I blame New Jersey for putting itself above the Constitution

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    delco, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Posts
    923
    Rep Power
    3958268

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    And here is the text of the article for anyone who doesn't want to click the link. It was a pain in the ass on my tablet with ads etc.


    HARRISBURG - Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane will not defend a new law that effectively stripped municipalities of the right to enact their own gun measures, raising the prospect that the controversial statute might not take hold.

    A spokeswoman on Thursday said Kane had exercised her authority to decline representing the state in a challenge to the law filed by Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Lancaster, and area lawmakers.

    Instead, she is deferring to lawyers working under Gov. Corbett - who in six weeks will relinquish their offices to a new Democratic administration.

    "The attorney general determined it would be more efficient and in the best interest of the commonwealth for the Office of General Counsel to handle this matter," said Kane's spokeswoman, Renee Martin.

    Corbett spokesman Jay Pagni said the counsel's office would take on the case, but he also assailed Kane for what he called "another example of the attorney general refusing to fulfill her constitutional duty to defend the commonwealth and the people who elected her."

    The law, which takes effect this month, granted out-of-state groups such as the National Rifle Association the right to sue municipalities that enact gun-related ordinances stricter than state law.

    Critics said it was a backhanded way to cripple municipalities' efforts to enact their own measures by subjecting them to costly and time-consuming litigation.

    Since its passage, four townships or boroughs in the state's southeastern corner have repealed ordinances that require residents to report lost or stolen firearms - measures they hoped would cut down on the flood of illegal gun sales.

    Others are considering similar repeals, local officials say.

    The challenge to the law, filed by State Sen. Daylin Leach (D., Montgomery) along with other lawmakers and the cities, argues that the firearms language in the law had no relation to the underlying bill it was amended to - one that increased penalties for stealing copper and other metals. The plaintiffs contend that violates the so-called "single-subject" rule for legislation stipulated by the state constitution.

    The decision by Kane, a Democrat, comes 18 months after she declined to defend the commonwealth in another controversial lawsuit - that one over its ban on same-sex marriage. Corbett, a Republican and her predecessor as attorney general, then hired outside counsel to defend the law.

    A federal judge eventually struck it down.

    On Thursday, Leach praised Kane as "doing the right thing" in the gun case.

    "She defends the state all the time, and the vast number of cases have credibility," he said. "But she is under no obligation to take an untenable position."

    Although Corbett's lawyers can act on the case, a decision on how to proceed will likely end up before the counsel that Gov.-elect Tom Wolf installs after he takes office next month. A spokesman, Jeffrey Sheridan, said the Wolf administration would review all existing litigation upon taking office.

    In Montgomery County, attorney Sean Kilkenny said three municipalities he represents - Whitemarsh, Jenkintown, and Norristown - have repealed their gun laws. Hatfield Township also repealed its law, and at least three others are considering it or are doing so.

    Despite Kane's stance, Kilkenny said he would not advise them to delay or backtrack.

    "The [state] law's still on the books, and the NRA could use it," he said. "Until the Supreme Court or someone else tells us otherwise, we're left with the law on the books."
    Quote Originally Posted by internet troll View Post
    I blame New Jersey for putting itself above the Constitution

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Waynesboro, Pennsylvania
    (Franklin County)
    Posts
    3,607
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: Kane Won't Defend New Gun Law

    This isn't going to stop when she's gone. Many people in this sad excuse of a country want more laws and more restriction, especially people in the eastern US.
    I hope you guys are prepared to be criminals, because some day in this generation your only other choice is going to be give up carrying and give up semi-autos or leave PA. Just about every municipality and Township in PA has been chomping at the bit to get rid of preemption. It's a train going down hill with no brakes, there's no stopping it. They are indoctrinating the next generation right now, I say less than five years we will experience teachers asking "Does your mommy and daddy have guns", when the answer is "yes" or "I think so", there will be a letter sent in the mail (if the USPS is still around) asking for the brand, caliber and serial number or your kids won't be allowed to attend school because they could be a danger to the other students. Wait until these kids that have been told throughout their schooling that guns are bad, guns are dangerous, get on town boards and start attending meetings.
    I'm sorry to say, it's a done deal folks. It's just a matter of one more generation.

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. So what can Wolf and Kane do?
    By mikelets456 in forum Pennsylvania
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: November 19th, 2014, 05:50 PM
  2. Kane is Able
    By Gman106 in forum Pennsylvania
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November 13th, 2014, 02:14 PM
  3. Kane
    By Tequila Sunrise in forum Pennsylvania
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 20th, 2014, 05:23 AM
  4. Where is Ms. Kane's Authority?
    By Ckygo-go in forum Concealed Carry
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 17th, 2013, 08:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •