Results 21 to 30 of 44
Thread: Carrying without testing?
-
November 4th, 2014, 12:24 AM #21
Re: Carrying without testing?
There's no such thing as a free lunch.
-
November 4th, 2014, 12:34 AM #22Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
-
Narberth,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Age
- 81
- Posts
- 588
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Carrying without testing?
Maybe he didn't retire. Maybe he was removed for reason of insanity. He is insane. I guess he never heard of an out-of-the-box failure or a stress caused malfunction like misalignment caused by the dynamic forces while firing. No matter what he doesn't know, I think he ought not be allowed to have a gun because he is not treating it safely.
-
November 4th, 2014, 12:49 AM #23
Re: Carrying without testing?
"Cives Arma Ferant"
"I know I'm not James Bond, that's why I don't keep a loaded gun under the pillow, or bang Russian spies on a regular basis." - GunLawyer001
-
November 4th, 2014, 01:00 AM #24
Re: Carrying without testing?
Interesting. I've always considered my reloads superior to factory rounds if I'm going for quality. I know Hornady isn't sitting there with a trickler getting exactly the same amount of powder in each case, exactly the right crimp and seating depth for my gun etc.
Instead, they're going for quantity over quality.
I would trust my reloads more because I'll bet we've all had a substandard round come out of a factory box.
Absolutely crazy to carry a firearm that isn't broken in, let alone never fired."A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself"
"He created the game, played the game, and lost the game.... All under his own terms, by his own doing." JW34
"Tolerance is the lube that helps slip the dildo of dysfunction into the ass of a civilized society." Plato
-
November 4th, 2014, 01:08 AM #25
Re: Carrying without testing?
That would be way outside my comfort zone. As corny as it sounds.... I want my carry gun to be an extension of me that I have complete confidence in. No surprises if I were to need it. Safety or no safety, long hard pull, short easy pull, reset, weight in hand, type of recoil, etc.... Not to mention does it actually work as advertised. A buddy of mine had a Kimber not to long ago that shot fine once then had a variety of problems after the first shot. He had to return it for work before it worked properly. Not the type of thing to find out when you really need it.
-
November 4th, 2014, 01:10 AM #26
Re: Carrying without testing?
Personally speaking, I've had more primer issues with my reloads than malfunctions with factory target ammunition. Granted, I use shitty, cheap wolf primers, so that probably has a lot to do with it. I have never experienced any issues with factory self defense ammo. Now, I've only fired a little over a thousand factory Gold Dots in my entire life, so my sample size is pretty small.
You would think the actual loading process and quality control process is different for different "grades" of ammo, but I could be wrong.There's no such thing as a free lunch.
-
November 4th, 2014, 01:16 AM #27
Re: Carrying without testing?
Not only do I test fire every carry weapon, as well as make sure it is broken- in, I test fire every round.
I want to be sure every one works perfectly.While many claim to support the right, precious few support the practice.
-
November 4th, 2014, 01:17 AM #28
Re: Carrying without testing?
Until you get a round with no flash hole or no anvil in the primer. Then you just may want to inspect each component yourself....
You would think the actual loading process and quality control process is different for different "grades" of ammo, but I could be wrong.
I don't have so much confidence. Especially after I have found blatantly obvious screwups myself in ammo made by them. If they miss that they can miss something much smaller.
Myself I usually like to run 100rds of carry ammo thru the gun to make sure it functions. I have fired 2 or 3 mags full already before issues showed up with the round that made me not carry it.Last edited by dkf; November 4th, 2014 at 01:27 AM.
-
November 4th, 2014, 01:55 AM #29
-
November 4th, 2014, 02:59 AM #30
Re: Carrying without testing?
This. And at least 100 rdsoutof each. New or spare magazine. If you. Belong to a club with magazine restrictions, load all your magazines up and change them out every 5 rounds. Or verify with the RO you are doing magazine reliability tests.. 100 rds is 2 boxes of 50 , you gget. 100 rounders of WWB for 40 bucks. Ffull day at the range.. I found a pin walks out of my ruger SR 45, back too the factory she's going when I am feelinng better. Better at the range than the gun figghht...I.
Last edited by bigandy1966; November 4th, 2014 at 03:08 AM.
Derrion Albert was my Hero.
Similar Threads
-
More testing of .308 Win.
By Brick in forum Ammunition & ReloadingReplies: 2Last Post: November 19th, 2013, 07:10 PM -
Testing 123
By Tester in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: December 3rd, 2008, 09:56 PM -
Testing
By danp in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: April 10th, 2008, 09:02 PM
Bookmarks