Results 11 to 17 of 17
-
February 12th, 2014, 06:02 PM #11
Re: Homeland Security to Purchase 141,000 Rounds of Sniper Ammo
A little over 6,000 rounds over (at least) seven platforms, (at least) 2 of which fire burst/auto and chew thru ammo in a bloody hurry. That's not very much, less than 1,000 each - *I've* got that much. Multiplied times 15 people equals ~2/3 of the order listed. Every round on that order is .338 Lapua, intended for carefully placed single shots from (basically) one platform. I couldn't shoot that in my lifetime if it was my job. That's gonna last a long time for a lotta shooters, and I sure don't wanna be on the pointy end of the equation.
-
February 12th, 2014, 06:04 PM #12
Re: Homeland Security to Purchase 141,000 Rounds of Sniper Ammo
Rules are written in the stone,
Break the rules and you get no bones,
all you get is ridicule, laughter,
and a trip to the house of pain.
-
February 12th, 2014, 06:06 PM #13
Re: Homeland Security to Purchase 141,000 Rounds of Sniper Ammo
-
February 12th, 2014, 06:24 PM #14
Re: Homeland Security to Purchase 141,000 Rounds of Sniper Ammo
That's the million dollar question.
Like I said, I'm not a fan of the DHS. I have no idea what they're training for. Civil unrest is probably one thing amongst others. It seems as though they don't consider themselves glorified security guards. The amount of ammo depends on how it's spread out. How many dedicated snipers do they intend on training? For what period of time? 1 year, 10 years, who knows? If they're planning on fighting a revolution they better order more than 141,000 rounds of ammunition.
-
February 12th, 2014, 06:38 PM #15
Re: Homeland Security to Purchase 141,000 Rounds of Sniper Ammo
-
February 12th, 2014, 06:41 PM #16
-
February 12th, 2014, 08:33 PM #17
Re: Homeland Security to Purchase 141,000 Rounds of Sniper Ammo
I find all of this article to be interesting, and on lots of levels, very comical. They may need that many rounds, and in the big picture, it's not that many rounds when you consider how many it takes for a true sniper to be proficient. It's also funny because how many snipers do they really need, and most of the ammo is spent completely on training.
I think it's really laughable when they have James Smith quoting a really old reloading manual, that is actually talking about some other bullet design and bullet weight. It's not like all bullets that weigh the same are designed the same or have the same BC's. What's really funny about that is that they want to pretend that the 165's have the best BC for the .308 Winchester and that's not EVEN close to true. Even when BC plays a part in all the dope, it's not just the B.C., but also the initial the you can push the bullet with that B.C., and how it plays out over longer distances. Most anyone that shots long range, especially .308 shooters will know that the 168 grain bullet is NOT the bullet you'd want to be shooting as a sniper long range. It's still laughable that they could get some match grade, long range ammo in lighter bullets for a "quarter of the price" (or even half). Match grade ammo costs, that's just how it is, that's the consistency you need for long range. There's so many inconsistencies with the article it's hard not to laugh at it on lots of levels. Either way, if it came down to me getting shot at with a sniper at any distance I'd have a chance at surviving, I'd DANG SURE want them to be shooting some 180 grain bullets that aren't known to expand very well, lol, just saying. I don't like how much ammo the DHS is purchasing, but I won't sweat this one too much.
Similar Threads
-
Dept.of Homeland Security buying up ammo?
By Krichardson in forum GeneralReplies: 12Last Post: May 23rd, 2013, 04:04 PM -
Is Homeland security about to....?
By Alchymist in forum GeneralReplies: 15Last Post: October 29th, 2009, 02:07 PM -
Dept of Homeland Security now visiting bulk ammo purchasers at home ?!?
By son of the revolution in forum GeneralReplies: 20Last Post: March 21st, 2009, 01:55 PM -
Homeland Security
By TaurusGuy in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: March 15th, 2008, 10:42 AM
Bookmarks