Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bucks Cty, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    70
    Posts
    6,014
    Rep Power
    21474860

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Looks like a trial run to sooner or later be expanded to all 57 States
    Its easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled....Mark Twain

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    East Berlin, Pennsylvania
    Age
    60
    Posts
    70
    Rep Power
    2895

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Idiotic law but, what else would you expect from the left coast!
    In the Land of the Blind,the One Eyed Man is King

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    next to my neighbor, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    13,625
    Rep Power
    21474867

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Thats what progressives do.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chester County, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    4,514
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Not surprised. I used to live there, and while I enjoyed the restaurants, the political climate, and 2A situation was just "unsustainable". lol.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yutopia, Pennsylvania
    (Westmoreland County)
    Posts
    3,789
    Rep Power
    13571860

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaran_X View Post
    http://www.guns.com/2013/10/30/san-f...0-plus-rounds/


    Because the gangbangers are going to turn in the magazines to their gats because of this, right?
    Another feel good law by the city by the bay.


    Odd city, San Fransisco. You run around buck naked, meet a man on the street, have sex with him in your bed but you best not have an Uzi parked under it.

    Nobody said that you could run around amok with the Uzi, just don't get caught owning one.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    ..............., Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    5,443
    Rep Power
    18796216

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Quote Originally Posted by streaker69 View Post
    Is there a definition of "ammunition components"? I could see how that might be defined only as powder, casings and bullets. But a magazine could be defined as something else.
    I agree with your interpretation. There is no statutory definition.

    Quote Originally Posted by flyingjunkie View Post
    Here's from the law



    I take the bold to mean magazines.
    Please expound on your definition of "ammunition component". Consider:

    M-W:

    component

    1: a constituent part : ingredient <an important component of the program> <stereo components>


    Oxford Advanced American Dictionary

    component noun
    /kəmˈpoʊnənt/ component pronunciation American

    one of several parts of which something is made
    the components of a machine
    the car component industry
    Key components of the government's plan are…
    Trust is a vital component in any relationship.
    component adjective [only before noun]
    Break the problem down into its component parts.
    1 Pa CS § 1903. Words and phrases.
    (a) General rule.--Words and phrases shall be construed according to rules of grammar and according to their common and approved usage; but technical words and phrases and such others as have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning or are defined in this part, shall be construed according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning or definition.
    IANAL

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    37
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Wouldn't the magazine be considered a component of the firearm itself, thus covered?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The land o' cotton, old times there are not forgotten
    Posts
    3,536
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Quote Originally Posted by ray h View Post
    I wonder where a chain fed firearm would fit into "mag capacity" laws? I wonder what part would be considered the "high capacity feeding device"? Would it be a single link?
    During the dark days of the magazine ban, links were considered "high capacity ammunition feeding devices" and non-government folks could only own ones that pre-dated the ban.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Allegeny National Forest, Pennsylvania
    (McKean County)
    Posts
    513
    Rep Power
    1144982

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    Quote Originally Posted by GeneCC View Post
    Another feel good law by the city by the bay.


    Odd city, San Fransisco. You run around buck naked, meet a man on the street, have sex with him in your bed but you best not have an Uzi parked under it.

    Nobody said that you could run around amok with the Uzi, just don't get caught owning one.
    That place, with its feel-good nature-insulting common sense-vacant left-leaning flowers-in-their-hair descendents really needs to just fall off and sink....
    Marty near God's Country. Making good people defenseless doesn’t make bad people harmless.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    York, Pennsylvania
    (York County)
    Posts
    422
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: San Francisco bans, now confiscating, 10+ round magazines

    i bet the law makers over there doesn't even got ten rounds in their own personal flesh mags, if you know what i mean, so they're venting their frustration out onto us by passing this law - obviously, and in turn what do we do back? Mock them. No. We must love them, and show compassion for their lack of testosterone. I say we email the cali senators, and all their influences confronting them about this telling them we now know the truth, and the jig is up. California, simply cannot progress otherwise.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •