Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 45
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Nepa, Pennsylvania
    (Wayne County)
    Posts
    482
    Rep Power
    858587

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    Please when THEY ask tell them I did not ask you to fight for me. Tell THEM I told you not to. I pity your family who you love much less than your gun and your own freedom.

    Self-imposed importance. Nothing else.

    over and out.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Republic of USA
    Posts
    841
    Rep Power
    1753590

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    Quote Originally Posted by PAMedic=F|A= View Post
    I don't think you're correct. There are a lot more Citizens than police. Not every cop is going to be willing to shoot his neighbors. I think most won't.

    Cops are not used to having to provide external security, cordons. They are not used to being shot at in urban or rural environments.

    In Iraq we had a three vehicle policy. No less than three go outside the wire.

    Many nights there are just two State Troopers on. Pennsylvania State Police cover more than 80% of the Commonwealth, and I feel do a damned fine job. But they are not equipped, trained, or remotely prepared for an active shooting civil war. Nor do I think a majority of PSP would be willing to violate the rights of the people.
    They are working on that. Paid for by the American tax money.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Republic of USA
    Posts
    841
    Rep Power
    1753590

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    Quote Originally Posted by BB MBD View Post
    You live under illusion. USA is already a police state. Where police armed as much if not better than regular army. Your phones and emails are monitored. Government fights illegal wars using your kids as cannon fodders. Changing laws disregarding constitution.
    But you are still free just cause you have a gun? Wake the heck up.

    As soon as you start digging deeper than you were allowed to you will end up like Waco, Ruby Ridge or Michael Hastings.

    Whatever your fathers were fighting for was sold, resold, bought back and flipped over again and again with most of your debt split between China, Russia and Europe.

    If you are so pro-freedom why wait till they come for your guns? Is there not enough reason to be up in arms?


    PS. Oh and I love the Macho drive.
    Somebody send this guy back to Canada

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Kulpmont, Pennsylvania
    (Northumberland County)
    Age
    35
    Posts
    177
    Rep Power
    178084

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    Quote Originally Posted by BB MBD View Post
    And I can see brainwashed clearly. But next time you are on outing with your 10 yo grandson or grand daughter look him/her in the eyes and tell them "You see this gun? This gun is more important to me than your life or your future". Tell them "I am ready to give up my life and your life or take life of others just to have this gun".
    It is not the gun I would die for.. It's the freedom that so many have died protecting that I would fight to my last breathe to secure. How about you look in their eyes and say, "I love you with all my heart, but I wouldn't defend the rights of you and I if it means I will likely be killed doing so." If your not willing to defend the right to bear arms.. Do us all a favor and don't bear them in the first place.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    York Township, Pennsylvania
    (York County)
    Age
    55
    Posts
    1,978
    Rep Power
    2559673

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    BB MBD, is this your post? Is someone else using your account or just change your mind about SHTF?

    http://forum.pafoa.org/gun-pictures-...ther-shtf.html

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Muhlenberg twp, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    233
    Rep Power
    1140676

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    like i said 1% at best. I hope for the sake of our country 1% will be enough. Our forefathers were brave men. I'm ashamed of what we are today.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Erwinna, PA
    Posts
    609
    Rep Power
    21474848

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    I would put my money on the side of the people is this happened again. Although the military and many PD's have some very good weapons, drones and nukes for example, we vastly outnumber them and have weapons that are almost as good.

    A few months ago I looked through a photojournal of about 30 photos of the makeshift weapons the rebels in Syria were making in garages and farm shops. They had armored vehicles, mounted machine guns, guided missiles, and all sorts of stuff; and they live in a back-asswards third-world country. Now imagine what we could come up with, with all the machinists, mechanics, electrical engineers, and advanced manufacturing capacity we have in this country. 300 million of us here, and I'd imagine that with a crash course, 90% of them could build at LEAST some type of functional firearm with common household materials.
    They even have minds but do not think. -Dov Fischer

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SEPA, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Age
    42
    Posts
    383
    Rep Power
    221649

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    I posted this elsewhere on 4/19/13, so forgive the tenses used:

    "1 guy currently has the city of Boston on lockdown.

    1 guy had LA and most of Northern California in full on panic mode.

    Those are 2 extremely recent stories (obviously, one is still in progress), where "1 guy" was able to disrupt an entire city and beyond.

    Multiply that "1 guy" times the amount of gun owners that would not comply with confiscation. I don't see how anybody with any "common sense" could see confiscation as a feasible plan in the USA.

    Unfortunately, we don't have any "common sense" politician laws."

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    4,880
    Rep Power
    21474857

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    Quote Originally Posted by johnfritz View Post
    I have almost non-existent faith that anyone would stand up to government thugs. At least no one around here.

    It hurts my heart to think this but I believe it's the truth.
    A critical part of determining it is how the individual assesses what they would be standing up against and under what circumstances. Would you know if the thugs were coming, and if so, with how much notice and preparation possible? Would you be able to get to your guns, or would they try picking people up at work when they know many wouldn't have the opportunity to be armed? Would communication with other like minded people be possible? Preparation for this scenario would be VERY difficult, and probably our worst problem would be communication.
    "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws--that's insane!" -- Penn Jillette

    "To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." -- Ted Nugent

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    dover, Pennsylvania
    (York County)
    Posts
    270
    Rep Power
    56833

    Default Re: “Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston”

    Quote Originally Posted by bamboomaster View Post
    This is quite a story....

    National Guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned
    assault weapons were ambushed by elements of a para-military extremist
    faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed
    and more than 200 injured before government forces were compelled to
    withdraw.

    Speaking after the clash, Massachusetts Governor Thomas Gage declared
    that the extremist faction, which was made up of local citizens, has
    links to the radical right-wing tax protest movement. Gage blamed the
    extremists for recent incidents of vandalism directed against internal
    revenue offices. The governor, who described the group's organizers as
    "criminals,” issued an executive order authorizing the summary arrest of
    any individual who has interfered with the government's efforts to secure
    law and order. The military raid on the extremist arsenal followed
    widespread refusal by the local citizenry to turn over recently outlawed
    assault weapons.

    Gage issued a ban on military-style assault weapons and ammunition
    earlier in the week. This decision followed a meeting in early this month
    between government and military leaders at which the governor authorized
    the forcible confiscation of illegal arms.

    One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out
    that "none of these people would have been killed had the extremists
    obeyed the law and turned over their weapons voluntarily." Government
    troops initially succeeded in confiscating a large supply of outlawed
    weapons and ammunition.

    However, troops attempting to seize arms and ammunition in Lexington met
    with resistance from heavily armed extremists who had been tipped off
    regarding the government's plans. During a tense standoff in Lexington’s
    town park, National Guard Colonel Francis Smith, commander of the
    government operation, ordered the armed group to surrender and return to
    their homes. The impasse was broken by a single shot, which was reportedly
    fired by one of the right-wing extremists. Eight civilians were killed in
    the ensuing exchange.

    Ironically, the local citizenry blamed government forces rather than the
    radical extremists for the civilian deaths. Before order could be
    restored, armed citizens from surrounding areas had descended upon the
    guard units. Colonel Smith, finding his forces over matched by the armed
    mob, ordered a retreat.

    Governor Gage has called upon citizens to support the state/national
    joint task force in its effort to restore law and order. The governor also
    demanded the surrender of those responsible for planning and leading the
    attack against the government troops. Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, and John
    Hancock, who have been identified as "ringleaders" of the extremist
    faction, remain at large.

    And this, people, is how the American Revolution began on April 20, 1775.
    The shot heard around the world.
    By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail. Benjamin Franklin

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: February 5th, 2013, 08:18 AM
  2. Seventy Thousand Seven Hundred Forty
    By Dannytheman in forum National
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: April 20th, 2012, 02:31 PM
  3. Replies: 22
    Last Post: June 17th, 2007, 02:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •