Sig Sauer P226 vs. Springfield XD9 5" - Help me decide

[BerksCountyDave]

I'm trying to decide between these two guns. Which would recommend, and why? The Sig is considerably more expensive. Is it worth it?

The gun will be used for:

1. Target practice
2. Occasional OC for SD
3. Nightstand gun

I will be shooting lead bullets through whatever I get. Neither of these guns use polygonal rifling, do they?

Thanks!
Dave

[JoeWilliams]

When Cathy was looking, we simply could not justify spending several hundred dollarss more for a Sig than for a Springfield Armory XD9. She also chose the 5" Tactical model. It's not a choice we've regretted. She absolutely loves her gun.

It's quite accurate with just about anything we've put in it. I've been tinkering with various loads for 147 gr cast bullets, with some good success. I chose the 147 because it's slower, which means less risk of leading. I've had issues with leading in other 9mms using lighter faster bullets in the past. Haven't tried them in her Tactical. We've had no issues with leading so far in her gun.

It's proven to be very reliable. As of yesterday, we have 700 rounds through it, with 3 failures, all FTEs. All 3 can be traced to user and/or ammo issues. The first was when my then 7 y/o boy shot it. I'd only loaded one, but if you look at the video on youtube you can see it didn't matter. Gun came way back, and the slide didn't have a chance to cycle. 2nd was when Cathy started learning to shoot one hand, weak hand, and did pretty much the same thing, limp wristed big time. 3rd was yesterday. I was experimenting with using Winchester 231 instead of Bullseye for the 147 grain lead bullets, and was using what was very much a minimum load. It barely cycled the XD9 and her S&W 59. Near the end of the day, as her gun dirtied, the cases were kind of dribbling out of the gun and landing on the bench next to her, and one of them didn't quite make it. Had the same weak slide cycling with the Model 59, but she didn't shoot it enough to dirty it up. The load was adequately accurate, but I'll bump it up for the next batch to compare with the Bullseye, if I bother. Might just save the W231 for lighter JHPs if I load some and the occasional .38 Special loads. It doesn't seem to be a particularly popular choice for heavier 9mm bullets. I do know that I'll be using Bullseye for the Hornady 147 gr XTP/JHPs we bought yesterday for our stockpile.

The gun works well with all types of ammo. We've used ball, 115 JHP standard and +Ps, 124 JHP standard, +P and +P+, 135 JHP +Ps, and of course 147 grain JHP and the lead round nose flat points I've been loading for our practice. It feeds them all with no problems, for whatever reason seems to shoot to almost the same point of aim regardless of ammo type and velocity. It's an easy pointing, well balanced, lightweight for the size gun, more comfortable to our hands than the Glocks or the Sigs. It's very mild in recoil, and recovers on target quickly. It's even comfortable tucked IWB once you get used to the barrell length.

I like the ambidextrous mag release, well shielded on both sides against accidental release. I also like the grip safety, which requires you to have a firing grip on the gun for it to fire. Like most all modern semi-autos, take down is bone simple, and takes about 15 seconds. I've read early versions had a finish that was relatively fragile, an issue that was supposed to have been fixed by the time Cathy bought hers. Their fix seems to have worked. With the exception of the end of the barrel and just around the chamber (places you'd expect to see minor finish wear by this time), there is absolutely no visible wear at all. It's even simpler to use than the Sig, without even a decocking lever. Just mag releases and slide lock/release.

I wasn't a fan of the trigger when she first bought the gun, but by 400 rounds it had smoothed and lightened, and is quite nice now. All in all, I think she made the right choice. I can't see what the extra $400 she would have spent on the Sig would have gotten us that would be worth the price. At most, maybe a fancier name. $400 dollars buys a lot of ammo, or another gun.

I tried thinking of some negatives about the gun, but I really can't think of any. I'd have no problem buying one for myself... an option that is actually appealing to me.

[Philadelphia]

I can't remember if the SIG is DA/SA. If so, for that reason, I'd stick with the XD.

I hate decockers and DA first shots. Just my preference. They're both very good guns.

[Dredly]

I think SIG P226 are going for like 300 for used due to German police which really removes the cost issue.

[BerksCountyDave]

I think SIG P226 are going for like 300 for used due to German police which really removes the cost issue.

You show me a 226 in good condition for 300 and I'll buy it.

[Dredly]

oops wrong Sig, meant the 225/P6

http://www.jgsales.com/product_info....oducts_id/1903

[Shawn.L]

I can't remember if the SIG is DA/SA. If so, for that reason, I'd stick with the XD.

I hate decockers and DA first shots. Just my preference. They're both very good guns.

ditto.
The DA/SA is alway so attrctive in theory, until you try to shoot the damn things with that looooooooong HEAVY pull followed by the short BAM BAM BAM. Not for me. I have owned two DA/SA and that played a large part in mt decision to sell them both.

I own an XDSC9 right now, love it, and quality and performance are no issue.

[K-9_Unit]

Both are very fine pistols sir...This day and age, it all comes down to personal preference and comfort...Both guns will pound rounds down range for many years to come with little or no troubles...I have experience with both so i will throw down a few pros and cons of my own...

Sig...

Pros---hellandback reliability, handsome ( if you care about that ), ergonomics of it are very comfortable and accuracy is topnotch...

Cons---It is still all iron ( if you care about the weight ) and pricey...

XD

Pros---value for what you pay is second to none, accurate in right hands, reliable, lightweight compared to the Siggie and ergos are very comfy also...

Cons---it took a while to get used to it but thats about it...

[1blindref]

I would recommend shooting both and then decide which one you like best.
Both are great guns and should serve you well.

If you don't want a DA/SA gun, the Sig can be had with the DAK (double action only) trigger system.

If you want to come to Classic Pistol in Southampton, I'd be more than happy to let you shoot one of my three P226s. I believe they also have the Spingfield XD9 as a rental. PM me if you'd like.

When it comes to something as important as a tool that might save your life, don't let $200-$300 play into your decision.

BTW - unless you buy a P226ST, the P226s (and all "P" series Sigs) have an alloy frame.

[Mr. S]

I'm trying to decide between these two guns. Which would recommend, and why? The Sig is considerably more expensive. Is it worth it?

The gun will be used for:

1. Target practice
2. Occasional OC for SD
3. Nightstand gun

I will be shooting lead bullets through whatever I get. Neither of these guns use polygonal rifling, do they?

Thanks!
Dave

Have you been able to shoot each?
I think that would make your decision easier.