Pittman-Robertson Funds Break All Records

**CL3** · May 10th, 2013, 11:30 AM

"The rush on guns and ammo produced $522,552,011 in Pittman-Robertson money in fiscal year 2013 alone. At a time of record federal deficits, slashed budgets and ideologically inspired attacks on conservation, the Act has never seemed so important, or so visionary."

http://www.fieldandstream.com/blogs/...reak-all-recor

**Lazylaser** · May 10th, 2013, 11:43 AM

I don't hunt with my guns or ammo. So why am I supposed to feel good about this tax?

**CL3** · May 10th, 2013, 12:16 PM

Thank you for your contribution to taking care of our countries land & wildlife.

**R.W.J** · May 10th, 2013, 12:48 PM

Originally Posted by Lazylaser

I don't hunt with my guns or ammo. So why am I supposed to feel good about this tax?

Because that money just doesnt benefit hunters. It benefits all wildlife, as well as provide funds for shooting ranges.

**Lazylaser** · May 10th, 2013, 08:43 PM

Originally Posted by R.W.J

Because that money just doesnt benefit hunters. It benefits all wildlife, as well as provide funds for shooting ranges.

Oh good!!!
Then lets double or triple the tax on guns and ammo!

I'll write my senator now! Then I can feel even better...

**IV_Warrior** · May 10th, 2013, 09:03 PM

Originally Posted by R.W.J

Because that money just doesnt benefit hunters. It benefits all wildlife, as well as provide funds for shooting ranges.

And yet, if you want to use those ranges, you still have to pay more $$$ to buy a license.........

**mongo** · May 10th, 2013, 09:32 PM

Think about this: If the parasites in Harrisburg and Washington can figure a way to tap into the Pittman-Robertson fund for there own little projects then for sure there will not be any new laws to restrict ammo and firearms...

**R.W.J** · May 11th, 2013, 08:56 AM

Originally Posted by IV_Warrior

And yet, if you want to use those ranges, you still have to pay more $$$ to buy a license.........

Because Pittman-Robertsom funds are paid out by land mass and number of hunting licenses bought per state.

**daschnoz** · May 22nd, 2013, 12:55 PM

Originally Posted by CL3

"The rush on guns and ammo produced $522,552,011 in Pittman-Robertson money in fiscal year 2013 alone. At a time of record federal deficits, slashed budgets and ideologically inspired attacks on conservation, the Act has never seemed so important, or so visionary."

http://www.fieldandstream.com/blogs/...reak-all-recor

Libtards hate my guns, they hate my ammo, but they love to go hiking in the parks and wilderness areas that these dollars support. Just another example of how we (the gun owning conservatives) are supporting something that the libtards think is free.