Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
March 1st, 2013, 07:17 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
-
Leifsbudhir
- Posts
- 436
- Rep Power
- 115530
S. 54 Would Effectively Ban Even More Guns than Feinstein's Bill!
Just got this from GOA:
http://capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/a...ertid=62464561
S. 54 Would Effectively Ban Even More Guns than Feinstein's Bill!
Violation of state gun bans would make you a "Prohibited Person" all across the country
Do you like Cuomo's semi-auto gun ban? D.C.'s microstamping requirement? Rahm Emaunuel's licensure laws?
The Senate is about to vote to make all of these into federal crimes, turning gun-owning Americans into prohibited persons — meaning they would NOT be able to own a firearm anywhere in the country!
We have talked about some of the problems with Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy's gun “trafficking” bill. Leahy apparently thinks that, if he puts a shiny label on the bill, he can ban as many guns as he wants.
But, at its core, S. 54 would make it a federal crime to violate virtually any state gun law.
Section 5 creates a new prohibited person” classification which makes it a federal crime to transfer a gun if “prohibited by State or local law ... from possessing [or] selling ... THE firearm or ammunition.” [Emphasis added]
Note the use of the word “the.” We're not talking about a person who's banned from owning ANY firearm. We're talking about a person who's prohibited by ANY state law from possessing a PARTICULAR firearm.
So do you like Andrew Cuomo's massive gun ban? He bans more types of guns than would Feinstein’s so-called “assault weapons” ban. Yet under S. 54, transferring a firearm banned by Cuomo becomes a federal crime, punishable by ten years in a federal prison — at least for New York residents and possibly for others.
Do you like California's proposed ammunition ban? That also becomes a federal crime — at least for California residents and perhaps for others.
So you like gun licensure? A person who doesn't have a license in New York and Illinois is also “prohibited by State ... law ... from possessing [or] selling ... the firearm.” This becomes a federal crime.
Do you agree with D.C.'s efforts to ban firearms by imposing a microstamping requirement? Transferring a non-microstamped firearm would become a FEDERAL crime under S. 54 — at least for D.C. residents and maybe others.
By voting for S. 54, your senator will be making guns banned by Andrew Cuomo’s expansive law into federally banned guns, as well. He will be saying, “I like every word of gun control which Rahm Emanuel is pushing.”
By the way, Senator Leahy is trying to sell S. 54 as a supposed crackdown on gun traffickers. But there’s not one word in this bill that would punish (or prevent) what happened in Fast & Furious, where our government helped send thousands of illegal guns south of the border, resulting in the murders of hundreds of Mexicans and at least one federal agent.
Moreover, it’s currently illegal to traffic in firearms. It’s illegal to sell a gun to a prohibited person [18 USC 922(d)]. It’s illegal to serve as a straw man [18 USC 922(d)]. It’s illegal to sell a bunch of guns without a license [18 USC 922(a)]. But that’s not what S. 54 is about. The one thing S. 54 would do is to make anti-gun bans being passed by every anti-gun state into federal crimes as well.
ACTION: Contact your senators. Demand that they oppose S. 54 and speak out against it.
-
March 1st, 2013, 07:57 PM #2
We're doomed if we cant organize and stand united as one!
Monday I'll be blowing up the phone on this matter now if my ear dont fall off first
Posted from Pafoa.org App for AndroidPeople always ask me why i never smile.I TELL THEM IT'S BECAUSE MY CORPSE IS STILL BREATHING AND THEY DON'T FUCKING GET IT!
-
March 1st, 2013, 09:00 PM #3
Re: S. 54 Would Effectively Ban Even More Guns than Feinstein's Bill!
If this bill passes, it will be time to use our guns, not protect them.
http://www.slcfsa.com/index.html
Remember...Terrorist are attacking Civilians; Not the Government. Protect Yourself!
-
March 1st, 2013, 09:06 PM #4
-
March 1st, 2013, 10:48 PM #5Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
-
Yutopia,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 3,791
- Rep Power
- 13571860
Re: S. 54 Would Effectively Ban Even More Guns than Feinstein's Bill!
Pat Leahy is a sneaky pete isn't he?
Just going to have to "bottle it up" in Committee. Call your Senators today!!
-
March 1st, 2013, 11:01 PM #6Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
-
Windsor,
Pennsylvania
(York County) - Posts
- 1,208
- Rep Power
- 1450701
Re: S. 54 Would Effectively Ban Even More Guns than Feinstein's Bill!
He's a sneaky something, so many vile and disturbing things that I'd have to ban myself if I used the language running through my head.
Leahy è un comunista, viscido, traditore, pomposo, pezzo di merda lumaca spremuto su un brufolo sul culo di Obama, con Cuomo facendo la stretta e leccare.
Similar Threads
-
Cosponsors for Feinstein's AWB bill
By t1066 in forum NationalReplies: 32Last Post: January 30th, 2013, 07:27 PM -
List of 158 guns to be banned under Feinstein bill
By Glock17 in forum NationalReplies: 63Last Post: January 25th, 2013, 06:30 PM -
Ohio Democrats introduce bill to effectively kill concealed carry in Ohio
By Jon Doe in forum NationalReplies: 7Last Post: January 22nd, 2013, 07:20 PM -
Feinstein's New Gun-Ban Bill Likely to be Introduced January 22
By tsafa in forum NationalReplies: 7Last Post: January 5th, 2013, 08:34 AM -
NRA Letter: Feinstein Goes For Broke With New Gun-Ban Bill
By Rich-D in forum NationalReplies: 5Last Post: December 28th, 2012, 01:25 PM
Bookmarks