Results 1 to 10 of 35
-
February 24th, 2013, 09:26 PM #1Active Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
-
Clay County,
Texas
- Age
- 76
- Posts
- 112
- Rep Power
- 7252
Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
The last sentence is great.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...adb_story.html
On the production floor of Beretta USA sits a hulking new barrel-making machine ready to churn out the next object of obsession in America’s love-hate relationship with guns: a civilian version of a machine gun designed for special operations forces and popularized in the video game Call of Duty.
Beretta, the nearly 500-year-old family-owned company that made one of James Bond’s firearms, has already invested more than $1 million in the machine and has planned to expand its plant further in Prince George’s County to ramp up production.
But under an assault-weapons ban that advanced late last week in the Maryland General Assembly, experts say the gun would be illegal in the state where it is produced.
Now Beretta is weighing whether the rifle line, and perhaps the company itself, should stay in a place increasingly hostile toward its products. Its iconic 9mm pistol — carried by every U.S. soldier and scores of police departments — would also be banned with its high capacity, 13-bullet magazine.
“Why expand in a place where the people who built the gun couldn’t buy it?” said Jeffrey Reh, general counsel for Beretta.
Concern that the company will leave, and take its 300 jobs with it, is palpable among state lawmakers who worry it could be collateral damage from Gov. Martin O’Malley’s proposed gun-control bill.
Among other restrictions, O’Malley’s bill would ban assault rifles, magazines with more than 10 bullets and any new guns with two or more “military-like” features. Gun experts said it’s a near-certainty that Beretta’s semiautomatic version of the ARX-160, now only a prototype, would be banned under O’Malley’s bill.
“I’m concerned. I think they’re going to move,” said Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Calvert). “They sell guns across the world and in every state in the union — to places a lot more friendly to the company than this state.”
In Beretta’s low-slung factory along the Potomac River in Accokeek, where walls are lined with trophy heads of caribou, wild boars and black bears shot by employees, the legislation proposed by O’Malley (D) feels like an affront.
In testimony this month in Annapolis, Reh, who oversees the plant, warned lawmakers to consider carefully the company’s future. Reh pointed to the last time Maryland ratcheted up gun restrictions in the 1990s: Beretta responded by moving its warehouse operation to Virginia.
“I think they thought we were bluffing” in the 1990s, Reh said. “But Berettas don’t bluff.”
The small U.S. division that Beretta started 35 years ago in Prince George’s has added substantial swagger to a company that already billed itself as the “World’s Oldest Industrial Dynasty.”
From behind the modest brick facade of an abandoned gun plant it purchased in 1977 on Indian Head Highway, Beretta won a landmark contract to become the standard sidearm of all U.S. military personnel in 1985. To the chagrin of American competitors, it soon replaced the venerable Colt 45.
More than a half-million of the company’s guns have been shipped to the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marines, each stamped as made in Accokeek.
“We literally are part of the arsenal of democracy,” said Reh, sweeping his hand toward the production floor, where on a recent afternoon more than 1,000 of the military version of the pistol sat in various stages of assembly. “That’s why we consider this so insulting.”
To fulfill the contract, Beretta expanded the plant by the length of a football field, installed an underground shooting range and hired 500 people. By 1990, during the peak of the first Gulf War, the company was the second-largest employer in Southern Maryland and had a supply chain of contractors that employed hundreds more.
Today, the company produces more than 100,000 guns annually, supplying the militaries and police of the United States and its allies, including the Iraqi army. It has shipped an additional million for purchase by private citizens, including some on display at its high-end galleries in Dallas, London, Milan and Paris. There, Beretta has turned firearms into a luxury accessory with its $130,000 Montecarlo shotguns, $1,000 hunting jackets and sweepstakes to hunt with the Duchess of Rutland.
The company’s new rifle, which it is reluctant to call an “assault” weapon, could add to that profile. It would be the first civilian version of a machine gun that is now available only to militaries, and that is configured with a clip-on grenade launcher for many special operations units.
Beretta plans to sell the semiautomatic, .223 caliber version as the ARX-100. It is expected to sell for about $2,000.
Uncertain future
The assault-weapons ban isn’t the only part of the governor’s bill Beretta dislikes.
In Maryland, gun manufacturers are required to register as firearms dealers, which some say could expose the company to lawsuits for selling and shipping weapons as dealers do. The Senate Judiciary Committee, which passed the governor’s bill 7 to 4 late Thursday, spelled out an exemption for Beretta and a handful of other smaller manufacturers in the state.
But the company said it is still not clear how it would handle warranty and repair issues for its many lines of guns, which are also serviced in Accokeek. The bill does not specify if the company could charge to fix guns that would be deemed illegal for sale, or if it could legally ship them back to their owners. Lawmakers said intermediary gun dealers would likely have to facilitate the transactions.
O’Malley aides say the bill could have outright banned manufacturing of assault weapons in the state but did not in part because of Beretta, which has agreed to meet with the administration on Monday to discuss the bill.
“We think getting assault weapons off the streets and keeping this company can both be accomplished,” said Raquel Guillory, O’Malley’s spokeswoman.
But some lawmakers said Beretta will have to be a bigger part of the discussion before the bill passes.
Del. Joseph F. Vallario Jr. (D-Prince George’s), whose district encompasses the Accokeek plant, said he would do everything he could for the company.
“We want to keep those jobs,” said Vallario, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, which has a key role in approving the legislation.
As he walked along the production floor recently, Reh said Beretta officials say they do not want to leave their U.S. headquarters in Maryland.
Relocating high-tech machining equipment and vats of chrome used to plate Beretta barrels would be costly and out of character for a company that is still based in the Italian town where it began in 1526.
The company’s Italian patriarch, Ugo Gussalli Beretta, visited the plant shortly after O’Malley introduced his gun-control bill, and the two discussed the issue. But Reh declined to say if the two reached any decisions about what would happen if the governor’s bill passes.
“All I can tell you is, Mr. Beretta said, ‘There always seems to be a problem with Maryland.’ ”
-
February 24th, 2013, 11:08 PM #2
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
Maryland is without a dought the f### me state for sure, before long all Marylanders will just sign pay checks over to the state, if it wasn't for the wife working for Hopkins I would be gone, this state has screwed over every resident of this state. They just don't understand how much revenue they have been forcing out of this state. Greedy bastards.
-
February 24th, 2013, 11:23 PM #3
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
It just amazes me that they are allowed to get away with this bullshit. We will ban assault weapons but we are gonna exempt the production of them by the manufacturer because we dont want to lose jobs or revenue. Absolutely incredible. Maryland has no desire make the streets any safer because if they did then Marylands stance would be well better to lose a few jobs and revenue rather then lives. I mean wasnt it or Commander in Chief who stated "if we save just on life". We all know these bans are bullshit and wont do anything to stop the violence as long as they allow the criminals to get away with murder and violence. Its not about stopping violence, it is about disarming law abiding citizens and doing away with the 2nd Amendment. I hope Beretta leaves and shows them Maryland politicians as well as those nationwide that there will be consequences to their actions.
Last edited by harty; February 24th, 2013 at 11:26 PM.
-
February 24th, 2013, 11:56 PM #4
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
So how are the current gun laws in Baltimore and DC working out?(I am aware DC is not considered MD)
Would love to see them move. Maybe directly north of their current location somewhere between the south NY border and north of the mason dixon line.
-
February 25th, 2013, 12:00 AM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
-
York,
Pennsylvania
(York County) - Posts
- 330
- Rep Power
- 10829
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
Frankly, I'd love to see both Baretta AND LWRC move across their current northern border!
-
February 25th, 2013, 12:30 AM #6
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
Corbett needs to stop giving HJs to the natural gas companies (we have the gas, it''s not going anywhere, no need to give away cash for something they HAVE to get from us) and start courting these firearm companies. Any word on what hes been up to?
5.56mm, 9mm, .40SW, .44 Mag, .357 Mag, .22LR, 12GA, .45-70, 7.62x54R
-
February 25th, 2013, 12:41 AM #7
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
Mr. Beretta, you are cordially invited to move your factory up to PA.
Just not Philly, Pittsburgh or Harrisburg.My Feedback - http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.ph...ight=stainless
-
February 25th, 2013, 01:05 AM #8
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
Sample letter, please feel free to use.
“All I can tell you is, Mr. Beretta said, ‘There always seems to be a problem with Maryland.’ ”
Beretta USA has expressed extreme displease at laws already past, and some pending in Maryland. This could be THE ideal time to pass legislation to encourage the wholesale movement of their operations to our Commonwealth, bringing with them many valuable, high skill, good paying jobs. Numerous other manufacturer have made similar statements, and we should make our intentions know that we intend to to become THE State where firearms and ammunition is produced.
We should: Look to aggressively lower our corporate tax rate - our current rates make us non-competitive.
Pass legislation that protects manufacturers from liability.
Make it clear that the Commonwealth of the Pennsylvania States that the rights of the citizens to keep and bear arms CAN NOT BE QUESTIONED, and as such, there can be no bans or weapons restrictions in this State.
-
February 25th, 2013, 02:15 AM #9
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
"you cant fight zombies with good intentions"
My Feedback:
http://forum.pafoa.org/feedback-109/98731-cmr076.html
-
February 25th, 2013, 07:33 AM #10
Re: Beretta’s future in Maryland tied to state’s gun-control debate
It's time to show the legislators that they work for the people and not the other way.
I'm feeling inspired to buy a new Beretta.
Similar Threads
-
Gun Control Debate
By darrenlobo in forum PoliticalReplies: 14Last Post: December 3rd, 2012, 08:26 PM -
Future AG...Gun Control Nightmare
By steelmover in forum GeneralReplies: 17Last Post: November 22nd, 2008, 03:35 AM -
The Future of America - DEBATE
By LorDiego01 in forum GeneralReplies: 8Last Post: November 16th, 2006, 02:00 AM
Bookmarks