Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Danielsville, Pennsylvania
    (Northampton County)
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    So, here's what I've been debating. Is it worth getting a compact...say and XDs, LC9, Nano, Shield, PPS, etc....or should you just carry a full/service sized pistol???? Thoughts?
    "Courage is fear holding on a minute longer" - GSP

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Reading, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Age
    53
    Posts
    823
    Rep Power
    21474849

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    I like my Px4 Subcompact vs the full size I get 10 shots of .40 and a small size that is easy to carry IWB or OWB whichever your choice is .

    FWIW I have a full size S&W .40 and a 4" .44 revolver that I occasionally carry OWB but my compact is my EDC by far. Good balance between firepower and size.
    Fortuna audaces iuvat
    "Who is John Galt?"
    Deus Vult

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Primos, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,861
    Rep Power
    21474854

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    If you are comfortable with oc and would not be bothered by a large gun I do not see why you would want a smaller pistol.

    If you do not like oc and can not carry a full sized gun I do not see why you would want a smaller gun.

    If you feel fine with oc and cc and can carry a big gun sometimes and may be tired some other times I can not see why you would not buy one of each.
    Some people just plain suck.
    If you're gonna be dumb ya gotta be tough.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Primos, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,861
    Rep Power
    21474854

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    BTW. My carry guns are a S&W MODEL 10-8 and a Ruger
    p-89. They are both on the big side.
    Some people just plain suck.
    If you're gonna be dumb ya gotta be tough.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
    (Dauphin County)
    Posts
    438
    Rep Power
    19069

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    I think you should go with compact. A full size is a bit impractical to take everywhere. A lot of places wont let you into there establishment with an o/c weapon. A compact or sub compact you can take everywhere and nobody will know. I carry a Ruger LCP all the time. I'd love to tote my S&W 659 everywhere but I just can and don't want to do it. Buy what you can carry with you all the time. A 380 on you is better than a 45 in the car 300 ft away.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Primos, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,861
    Rep Power
    21474854

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    Quote Originally Posted by johnydavid View Post
    I think you should go with compact. A full size is a bit impractical to take everywhere. A lot of places wont let you into there establishment with an o/c weapon. A compact or sub compact you can take everywhere and nobody will know. I carry a Ruger LCP all the time. I'd love to tote my S&W 659 everywhere but I just can and don't want to do it. Buy what you can carry with you all the time. A 380 on you is better than a 45 in the car 300 ft away.
    Many people will try to avoid places that don't allow guns. I only go to one place where I carry concealed. (work is another matter) Where one stands on method of carry plays a big part in the decision on big or little. Hmmm, I guess that is what you just typed.
    Some people just plain suck.
    If you're gonna be dumb ya gotta be tough.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Conshohocken PA
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    361
    Rep Power
    19869

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    It's a catch 22.

    full sizes are best to shoot and practice with; hence, the ones you get good with.

    subcompacts are pain in the butt to shoot, but conceal really well.

    the holy grail is the gun you can conceal, but is fun to shoot at the range, and you can practice with and get good at.

    then you have to figure caliber, and capacity, hell, then it all goes to shit.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    back to Port Charlotte, Florida
    Age
    60
    Posts
    5,483
    Rep Power
    3627622

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    You got a couple sub compacts listed, BTW.

    My advice is to carry as much gun as you feel comfortable with, make sure it functions reliably, and get good with it. If you can draw a butter knife, quickly; throw it and hit your mark every time, you already have an advantage in a fight.
    BCM and Glock...for a bigger pile of 'cold dead hands' brass.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    482
    Rep Power
    86153

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    Use the one that fits your hand best.

    We aren't splitting atoms here.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    State College, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    299
    Rep Power
    6908

    Default Re: Compact vs Full Size/Service Size

    As others have said, a compact will conceal better, but a full size is easier/more pleasant to shoot. If you plan on concealing, buy a little guy, if not buy a full size. Either way, practice, practice, practice.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Compact vs Full Size
    By Mtbkski in forum General
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: January 16th, 2008, 08:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •