Sheriff Warns Of “Second American Revolution” If Gun Grabbers Get Their Way

[PAMedic=F|A=]

Milwaukee County law enforcer urged his citizens to arm themselves

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Feb 19, 2013
A Milwaukee County Sheriff has warned that a second American Revolution may be sparked if unconstitutional gun laws are enforced by police and sheriff’s department officials.
Sheriff David Clarke recently urged the citizens he serves to consider learning firearm safety because of “a duty to protect yourself and your family.”
In a message posted on the Sheriff’s website, Clarke wrote “I need you in the game, but are you ready? With officers laid-off and furloughed, simply calling 9-1-1 and waiting is no longer your best option. You can beg for mercy from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back; but are you prepared?”
“Consider taking a certified safety course in handling a firearm so you can defend yourself until we get there. You have a duty to protect yourself and your family. We’re partners now. Can I count on you?” the message urged.
Speaking on the Alex Jones Show yesterday, the Sheriff hit home his opinions on the gun control proposals that are being pushed via presidential executive orders.
“First of all, to me that would be an act of tyranny. So the people in Milwaukee County do not have to worry about me enforcing some sort of order that goes out and collects everybody’s handgun, or rifles, or any kind of firearm and makes them turn them in.” Clarke said.
“The reason is I don’t want to get shot, because I believe that if somebody tried to enforce something of that magnitude, you would see the second coming of an American Revolution, the likes of which would make the first revolution pale by comparison.” the Sheriff urged.

Like Alex Jones, Sheriff Clarke also recently appeared on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight, in an interview that was clearly set up by Morgan in a failed attempt to demonize lawful gun owners and push the idea of strict gun control. During the broadcast Morgan said that Clarke’s plea regarding citizens arming themselves would “turn Milwaukee into the Wild Wild West”.
“This has nothing to do with violence reduction because the type of violence that we’re talking about, that I see on the streets in the Milwaukee area on a daily basis is not even committed using the weapons that the left is trying to ban.” Clarke told Jones’ listeners.
“They are not using assault rifles, they are not using high capacity magazines, they are not buying their ammo over the internet. The criminals couldn’t care less about a background check, so that tells me that this is ingenuous.” he added.
Related: Many More Sheriffs Vow Not To Enforce Federal Gun Control Laws
“If they were serious about violence reduction, they would get behind me… and join me arm in arm in calling for longer periods of incarceration for repeat career criminals who have demonstrated over and over again that they are going to get a hand gun, that they are going to get a firearm and perpetrate violence.” Clarke noted.
The Sheriff added that a recent a Sikh temple shooting in his County a few months ago was perpetrated by an individual who passed a firearms background check.
“My understanding is the creep in Aurora Colorado who shot up the theatre, also passed a background check.” Clarke said. “This isn’t about background checks, of which the overwhelming majority of gun transfers go on anyway.”
“This is about attacking the Second Amendment, it’s about going after the wrong crowd.” The Sheriff posited.
Asked why he believed such strict measures were being pushed by the Obama administration at this time, the Sheriff pointed toward a general push for increased governmental control over society.
“Government control cannot go on as long as people have some sort of ability to say ‘hey wait just a doggone minute’.” The Sheriff told listeners. “That’s what the government fears, they don’t really fear the criminals, they support the criminals. What they fear is a law abiding person.” he added.
“Read the Declaration of Independence, it’s right there where a law abiding people say ‘enough is enough, you are exerting too much influence in our lives, this is tyrannical and we’re going to stop it,’ that’s what they are worried about.” he concluded.

[308man]

Let remember the incredible bloodshed the would occur. Most likely you and your family would be killed. Owning firearms does not make you immune. This situation would be bad for all America. I prefer the ballot box first.

[drh 686]

Let remember the incredible bloodshed the would occur. Most likely you and your family would be killed. Owning firearms does not make you immune. This situation would be bad for all America. I prefer the ballot box first.

Not going to work if the voting is fixed. In other words, voter fraud.

[DClan]

I think the attack on the second amendment may be a precipitous attempt to "soften" the American public before the collapse of the American economy and declaration of Martial Law. Face it, Martial Law is easier to attempt and control and unarmed society than an armed one. The Government has bankrupted the nation, and when the collapse comes, there is going to be a full on March on Washington D.C. to toss these asshats out of office. Our government is so large that their combined salaries on the taxpayer teat is more than the GNP of most small countries. That is what they fear, and why Obama wants a national security force that's not beholden to the constitution, and a Military that will fire on American citizens. God forbid if those Washington asshats have to give up their free ride even after the apocalypse.

[fortysix]

I think the attack on the second amendment may be a precipitous attempt to "soften" the American public before the collapse of the American economy and declaration of Martial Law. Face it, Martial Law is easier to attempt and control and unarmed society than an armed one. The Government has bankrupted the nation, and when the collapse comes, there is going to be a full on March on Washington D.C. to toss these asshats out of office. Our government is so large that their combined salaries on the taxpayer teat is more than the GNP of most small countries. That is what they fear, and why Obama wants a national security force that's not beholden to the constitution, and a Military that will fire on American citizens. God forbid if those Washington asshats have to give up their free ride even after the apocalypse.

You mean lifetime welfare, second generation section 8, platinum card EBT, 5th generation food stamps, all those who make a career of suckling at the teat, those combined salaries? Those make the salary of those actually employed by the government pale. They won't ever kill santa claus, and they will be our enemy if we ever decide to fight for something other than cable tv.

[NikeBauer21]

Let remember the incredible bloodshed the would occur. Most likely you and your family would be killed. Owning firearms does not make you immune. This situation would be bad for all America. I prefer the ballot box first.

We've been trying that for over 6 years now with the current personnel... But when the welfare dependents and sheep have outnumbered those with brains and the ability to think, it's a damning situation.

[4070BN]

You mean lifetime welfare, second generation section 8, platinum card EBT, 5th generation food stamps, all those who make a career of suckling at the teat, those combined salaries? Those make the salary of those actually employed by the government pale. They won't ever kill santa claus, and they will be our enemy if we ever decide to fight for something other than cable tv.

We've been trying that for over 6 years now with the current personnel... But when the welfare dependents and sheep have outnumbered those with brains and the ability to think, it's a damning situation.

It's reached the point of no return, why work when someone will give you everything you need, free phone, housing etc.. How sad is this group of deadbeats? I really feel sorry for the upcoming generation who has to deal with the debt these handouts are causing. We feel the pinch but they are really going to feel the pain of a welfare nanny state.

[fortysix]

Strictly by definition, it would be a second civil war, not revolution.

[98Redline]

You could possibly call it either, however I think the definition of revolution is more correct.

rev·o·lu·tion
/ˌrevəˈlo͞oSHən/ Noun
...
: a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed

civ·il war Noun
: a war between opposing groups of citizens of the same country

[redeye202]

If you look at it, it is a civil war we are in right now, we are not in a fight against a foreign invader, we are in a war with the federal government, our federal government, the one that we thought we elected to do our business, it has turned neighbor against neighbor, family member against family member, friend against friend, just like in 1865, our country is divided, and at some point there will be a spark that will start blood to be shed, it is not if, but when.