Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 9 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789101112 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 119
  1. #81
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Hueco Mundo, Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    2,064
    Rep Power
    604455

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    I think this discussion about the 5.7 is a moot point anyway since the OP isn't asking about that caliber. Valorious brought it up as an option to the OP to consider. If the OP is not interested in the 5.7, which is what it would seem, then there is no use in discussing it further.

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    6,705
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    Quote Originally Posted by RXM View Post
    I think this discussion about the 5.7 is a moot point anyway since the OP isn't asking about that caliber. Valorious brought it up as an option to the OP to consider. If the OP is not interested in the 5.7, which is what it would seem, then there is no use in discussing it further.
    Yep, that's why I'm suggesting the 5.56. I'm tryyyyyyying real hard to stay on topic.

  3. #83
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    South of Heaven
    Posts
    4,549
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    Actually, i listed several advantages in plain old black and white text. And i'm not the one that brought up other calibers first. .300 black out and 6.8mm SPC were mentioned by other posters first.

    5.7mm advantages: Much lighter/more compact ammo
    Ammo compatibility with your sidearm
    Mag compatibility with your sidearm
    Your sidearm will defeat level IIIA body armor
    Greatly reduced recoil for faster follow up shots

    5.56mm advantages: Commonality with US police/military forces
    Relatively inexpensive ammo (though not for Mk262)
    M855 can actually defeat some lvl III and IV SAPI plates

    7.62x39mm advantages: Better against big predators
    Very inexpensive ammo and mags
    Better penetration against some tactical barriers

    They all have disadvantages as well:

    5.7mm: Relatively expensive ammo,
    expensive platforms,
    uncommon, though it is in use with 200 dep'ts/agencies in US.

    5.56mm: AR platform can be quite finicky
    The really good ammo is very expensive
    Greatly reduced ammo count compared to 5.7mm
    Ammo and mags not compatible with sidearm

    7.62x39mm: Very heavy recoil compared to others, slowest follow on shots
    Much smaller ammo count can be carried on your person
    Ammo and mags not compatible with sidearm
    No US forces or Police use the AK

    You can do this for any possible caliber under the sun, including 5.45mm, 7.62x51mm, .300 black out, or even a 12ga shotgun. Every platform will have it's own advantages and disadvantages.
    Last edited by Valorius; September 1st, 2012 at 10:27 PM.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Mount Carmel, Pennsylvania
    (Northumberland County)
    Age
    50
    Posts
    2,442
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    Your forgetting reliability and durablility, AK trumps 57 and 5.56 in reliability which counts as something.

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Erie, Pennsylvania
    (Erie County)
    Posts
    6,586
    Rep Power
    21474856

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    Quote Originally Posted by arjohnson View Post
    Yep, that's why I'm suggesting the 5.56. I'm tryyyyyyying real hard to stay on topic.

    Should'a mentioned the 300 AAC Blackout, with another upper that can be affixed to the AR lower, and use the same mags, and so on and so forth ...
    Quote Originally Posted by Aggies Coach View Post
    Cause white people are awesome. Happy now......LOL.

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    6,705
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    Quote Originally Posted by Gun View Post
    Should'a mentioned the 300 AAC Blackout, with another upper that can be affixed to the AR lower, and use the same mags, and so on and so forth ...
    I'll save that for another time.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Nowhere Land, Pennsylvania
    (Westmoreland County)
    Posts
    4,954
    Rep Power
    5723755

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    Quote Originally Posted by northernlights View Post
    I know, I know, it's been asked a billion times, but I want to ask a little more specific question than just "which is better."

    On the stopping power of these two rounds, some people seem to think that the 5.56 is better because it fragments and tears you up inside, while others say that the 7.62 is better because it is heavier, slower, and bigger, and hits harder. So, my question for your consideration is: Which is the better thing: To tear the adversary up, or hit him hard? (Yes, that is oversimplification, and this thread will probably not last 4 pages before it becomes an all-out mudfest).
    The Mk272 Mod 1 causes tremendous terminal effect.

    A .30 caliber, whether Soviet or NATO, will provide better barrier penetration.

    Lots of "skinny's" in Mogadishu apparently failed to notice the terminal effect of M855.

    Lots of Marines and regular Army ended up KIA in Vietnam at the hands of the VC and NVA toting AK's in 30R.

    I would suggest forgetting all the scientific and anecdotal gobble-dee-goop.

    No matter what platform or caliber you choose, you should start your quest by acquiring the skill to actually hit the threat.
    Last edited by TonyF; September 1st, 2012 at 10:47 PM.

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    6,705
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    Quote Originally Posted by TXDMERC73 View Post
    Your forgetting reliability and durablility, AK trumps 57 and 5.56 in reliability which counts as something.
    Sorry but the AK does not trump the AR in reliability, that's another internet myth. Both are very reliable weapons.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Nowhere Land, Pennsylvania
    (Westmoreland County)
    Posts
    4,954
    Rep Power
    5723755

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    No offense to the OP but I find this topic even more tiresome than the accu-wedge thread.

    It's all about "software", not "hardware".

    Whichever caliber or platform you choose, becoming proficient with it is the key.

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Hueco Mundo, Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    2,064
    Rep Power
    604455

    Default Re: 5.56 vs. 7.62x39

    Quote Originally Posted by TonyF View Post
    Whichever caliber or platform you choose, becoming proficient with it is the key.
    Truth!

    10

Page 9 of 12 FirstFirst ... 56789101112 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 7.62x39 for .380 ACP
    By zachomega in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 26th, 2009, 08:39 PM
  2. Well, i did it 7.62x39
    By Guns4Fun in forum General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: February 20th, 2009, 10:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •