Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: Gen 4 Glock 35 Review
-
August 15th, 2012, 04:15 PM #1
Gen 4 Glock 35 Review
Here's a quick synopsis of what I've found through a little over 1k rounds through my Gen 4 G35:
Pros:
-Reliable (despite the internet lore, I have never seen any issues personally with Gen4 40 caliber Glocks)
-Accurate (more accurate than 99% of the shooters that will own one)
-Durable (I'm pleasantly surprised with the lack of finish wear on the inside of this gun, the newer Glock finish is holding up well)
-Easy to maintain
-TONS of aftermarket support; especially competition sights if you are looking to use this gun competitively
-Accepts 15, 17, and 22 round factory magazines
-Similar in size to a full size 1911, yet has increased capacity and is lighter (I realize it's a different caliber, just pointing that out as not to start a caliber war)
-Glock's customer service is second to none
-Cheap replacement parts, should you ever need them
-Low Bore Axis resulting in a relatively soft shooting gun
-Easily modified to fit the shooters' preferences
-Requires very little cleaning/lubrication to run reliably (that said, clean your guns!)
-Comes with 3 mags standard
Cons:
-I'm not a fan of the design of the Gen4 backstrap system
-Very little to no magwells on the market that can be used with the backstraps
-More expensive than the standard size Glock pistols
-I dislike the factory adjustable sights
Here's a video with some shooting on steel plates from the 12m line, the 40m (really 38m but I round up so it seems more impressive ) line, a table top discussion with a demonstration of disassembly/assembly and a size comparison to a standard 1911, G22, and G23 followed lastly by a chronograph test:
Chronograph results:
Winchester Ranger 135gr JHPs: 1208fps, 437 ft/lbs energy
Federal HST 165gr Bonded JHPs: 1114fps, 455 ft/lbs energy
Federal HST 180gr JHPs: 1095fps, 479 ft/lbs energy
-
August 16th, 2012, 10:58 AM #2
Re: Gen 4 Glock 35 Review
Great review. Thanks for putting it together. That's a fine looking pistol you have there. I currently only own 19s and 26 but I feel a long slide model Glock may be in my future.
-
August 17th, 2012, 12:42 PM #3
-
August 17th, 2012, 12:57 PM #4
Re: Gen 4 Glock 35 Review
How minimal is the recoil on a 34? It must be darn near non-existant.
-
August 17th, 2012, 01:11 PM #5
Re: Gen 4 Glock 35 Review
Well done review, the 1911 review is quality work as well!
-
August 17th, 2012, 10:15 PM #6
-
August 17th, 2012, 10:17 PM #7
Similar Threads
-
Glock 22 Gen 4 - Range Review
By medicjz in forum PistolsReplies: 3Last Post: June 12th, 2014, 09:29 PM -
Glock 17 Review
By JDePietro in forum PistolsReplies: 10Last Post: February 21st, 2012, 12:42 PM -
Gun Review: Glock 33
By JohnUSCG in forum GeneralReplies: 13Last Post: December 24th, 2008, 12:06 AM -
Review: Advantage arms 22 kit for glock
By MarcS in forum GeneralReplies: 41Last Post: December 1st, 2007, 08:02 PM -
Glock 29 review(10mm)..
By XD45 in forum GeneralReplies: 3Last Post: May 25th, 2007, 06:13 PM
Bookmarks