Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
June 7th, 2012, 06:04 PM #1Active Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
-
Anytown, USA
- Posts
- 126
- Rep Power
- 5682
Holder: Emails Using Words ‘Fast and Furious’ Don’t Refer to Operation Fast & Furious
Click the link to watch two minutes of Holder's testimony.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hold...ation-fast-and
Holder Claims Emails Using Words ‘Fast and Furious’ Don’t Refer to Operation Fast and Furious
By Matt Cover
June 7, 2012
(CNSNews.com) – Attorney General Eric Holder claimed during congressional testimony today that internal Justice Department emails that use the phrase “Fast and Furious” do not refer to the controversial gun-walking operation Fast and Furious.
Under questioning from Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), who read excerpts of the emails at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Justice Department oversight, Holder claimed that the phrase “Fast and Furious” did not refer to Fast and Furious but instead referred to another gun-walking operation known as “Wide Receiver.”
However, the emails refer to both programs -- "Fast and Furious" and the "Tucson case," from where Wide Receiver was launched -- and reveal Justice Department officials discussing how to handle media scrutiny when both operations become public.
Among three of the emails (see Jason Weinstein Email Fast, Furious.pdf), the second, dated “October 17, 2010 11:07 PM,” was sent by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jason Weinstein to James Trusty and it states: “Do you think we should have Lanny participate in press when Fast and Furious and Laura’s Tucson case [Wide Receiver] are unsealed? It’s a tricky case, given the number of guns that have walked, but it is a significant set of prosecutions.”
In the third email, dated Oct. 18, 2010, James Trusty writes back to Weinstein: “I think so, but the timing will be tricky, too. Looks like we’ll be able to unseal the Tucson case sooner than the Fast and Furious (although this may be just the difference between Nov. and Dec).”
“It’s not clear how much we’re involved in the main F and F [Fast and Furious] case,” reads the email, “but we have Tucson [Wide Receiver] and now a new unrelated case with [redacted] targets. It’s not any big surprise that a bunch of US guns are being used in MX [Mexico], so I’m not sure how much grief we get for ‘guns walking.’ It may be more like ‘Finally, they’re going after people who sent guns down there.’” (See Jason Weinstein Email Fast, Furious.pdf)
Operation Wide Receiver was run out of Tucson, Ariz., between 2006 and 2007 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), a division of the Justice Department.
In his testimony, Holder said that the emails only referred to Operation Wide Receiver.
Holder told the committee: “That refers to Wide Receiver, not to Fast and Furious. The e-mail that you [Rep. Chaffetz] just read [between Trusty and Weinstein] – now this is important – that email referred to Wide Receiver, it did not refer to Fast and Furious. That has to be noted for the record.”
Chaffetz, after a long pause, said, "No, it doesn't. It says Fast and Furious. 'Do you think we should have Lanny participate in press when Fast and Furious and Laura’s Tucson case [Wide Receiver] are unsealed?' It's specific to Fast and Furious. That is not true, Mr. Attorney General. I'm happy to share it with you."
Operation Fast and Furious was carried out by the ATF. It began in the fall of 2009 and continued into early 2011, during which time the federal government purposefully allowed known or suspected gun smugglers to purchase guns at federally licensed firearms dealers in Arizona. The government did not seek to abort these gun purchases, intercept the smugglers after the purchases, or recover the guns they had purchased.
In some cases, as the government expected they would, the smugglers delivered the guns to Mexican drug trafficking organizations. Two rifles sold to a smuggler in the course of Operation Fast and Furious in January 2010 ended up at the scene of the murder of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in December 2010.Last edited by Jon Doe; June 7th, 2012 at 06:42 PM. Reason: deleted a word
Not to be confused with PAFOA member John Doe from Montgomery County, PA
-
June 7th, 2012, 07:06 PM #2
Re: Holder: Emails Using Words ‘Fast and Furious’ Don’t Refer to Operation Fast & Fur
It will be nice to see this POS in an orange jumpsuit.
Its easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled....Mark Twain
-
June 7th, 2012, 07:52 PM #3
Re: Holder: Emails Using Words ‘Fast and Furious’ Don’t Refer to Operation Fast & Fur
It would be nice to see him in an orange jump suit in a predominantly hispanic prison. Just my opinion.
[SIGPIC]
-
June 21st, 2012, 11:42 AM #4
Re: Holder: Emails Using Words ‘Fast and Furious’ Don’t Refer to Operation Fast & Fur
Who knew he was such a fan of the movie?
-
June 21st, 2012, 11:44 AM #5Super Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
-
Bucks Cty,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 927
- Rep Power
- 37301
Re: Holder: Emails Using Words ‘Fast and Furious’ Don’t Refer to Operation Fast & Fur
It depends what your definition of sex is.
."The more people I meet, the more I like my dog."
Bookmarks