Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ephrata, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    640
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    I live in the development behind the Green Dragon. I go there maybe once a month. Assuming it is warm enough not to warrant a coat, I am always OC. (SP-101 IWB) No one has ever said a word to me. Your mileage may vary.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Reading-ish, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    839
    Rep Power
    21474850

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    Quote Originally Posted by tl_3237 View Post
    Neither in a vehicle nor in a building is deterministic as to whether a firearm is concealed. It relies more on the 'observability' of the firearm to a passer-by.
    From another thread:
    North Dakota Code and Blacks Law Dictionary are not PA law. If one wants to know PA law, one should reference the PA law books.
    A legal defense of "But in North Dakota...." doesn't work well in PA.
    Quote Originally Posted by Grey Bearded One View Post
    He's allowed because he's special.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Age
    55
    Posts
    4,083
    Rep Power
    21474858

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    I've open carried there many times as well.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    ..............., Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    5,444
    Rep Power
    18905654

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    Quote Originally Posted by jw34 View Post
    North Dakota Code and Blacks Law Dictionary are not PA law. If one wants to know PA law, one should reference the PA law books.
    A legal defense of "But in North Dakota...." doesn't work well in PA.
    As I aptly stated in the quoted post:

    FWIW when a court seeks a definition that is not provided by state or case laws they can, and do, reach out to statutes in other states to formulate definitions for use in the case at hand.
    The thrust of my post was to show what definitions are available, since PA lacks same, and that state courts can and do look at references such as I provided in the divination of a Pa definition for subsequent application to their instant case under consideration. And, yes, one could suggest to a court, wrestling with a definition, to take judicial notice of a sister state's phraseology, a sister state's appellate rulings and entries in Black's Law Dictionary as input into their calculus.

    For those unfamiliar with it:

    Black's Law Dictionary is the most widely used law dictionary in the United States. It was founded by Henry Campbell Black (1860–1927). It is the reference of choice for definitions in legal briefs and court opinions and has been cited as a secondary legal authority in many U.S. Supreme Court cases.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black's_Law_Dictionary

    More directly, here at PAFOA, when trying to ascribe a definition lacking in PA statute or case law, we look towards the same documentary evidence available to the Pa courts to make an educated 'guess' as to what definition they might implement. Obviously only the court's final ruling after their ratiocinative processes is definite but, in the interim, we can hypothesize as to likely candidate definitions that may be adopted.

    -----------------------ETA-------

    In support of the above was a analogous discussion regarding the "place of business" phrase used in statutes of various states including 18 Pa CS §6106(a). In a ruling of the Supreme Court of CT, trying to prescribe a definition to said undefined statutory phrase, you can see that the court not only considered Black's Law dictionary but also alien court rulings from many states (including NJ, Ill, PA, and DC) to wit:

    There are several other jurisdictions with similar prohibitions
    against unregulated handguns that limit the
    ‘‘place of business’’ exception to businesses in which
    there is a possessory or proprietary interest. See, e.g.,
    Scott v. United States, 392 A.2d 4, 6 (D.C. App. 1978)
    (exception limited to those with ‘‘controlling . . .
    interest in the business premises’’); Berkley v. United
    States, 370 A.2d 1331, 1333 (D.C. App. 1977) (‘‘The common
    understanding of ‘place of business’ read in context
    with ‘dwelling house’ . . . is one of a protectible possessory
    interest. . . . [T]he exception is applicable
    only to those who have a controlling, proprietary or
    possessory interest in the business premises in question.’’);
    People v. Free, 112 Ill. App. 3d 449, 453, 445
    N.E.2d 529 (1983) (exception extended to ‘‘proprietor’s
    fixed place of business’’); People v. Clark, 21 Mich. App.
    712, 716, 176 N.W.2d 427 (1970) (exception created to
    allow people to defend place in which they have possessory
    interest); State v. Valentine, 124 N.J. Super.
    425, 427, 307 A.2d 617 (1973) (‘‘place of business’’ not
    extended to cover manager of bar owned by another);
    People v. Francis, 45 App. Div. 2d 431, 432, 358 N.Y.S.2d
    148 (1974) (‘‘place of business’’ implies possession and
    right to defend); Commonwealth v. Carr, 334 Pa. Super.
    459, 462, 483 A.2d 542 (1984) (exception limited to ‘‘persons
    who have a controlling, proprietary, or possessory
    interest in their place of business’’). These cases illustrate
    their respective jurisdiction’s statutory intent to
    restrict the presence of unlicensed handguns in the
    public sphere. Because we conclude that this is the same purpose behind § 29-35 (a),
    we are persuaded
    to follow the example of our sister states who have
    interpreted the phrase ‘‘place of business’’ to mean that
    in which one has a possessory or proprietary interest
    .
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CHRISTOPHER M. VICKERS
    (SC 16376) (2002)
    Last edited by tl_3237; March 1st, 2015 at 12:20 PM. Reason: typo and ETA
    IANAL

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Reading-ish, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    839
    Rep Power
    21474850

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    Oh, I hear ya, if we're trying to define the word concealed, which you posted in response to concealing with a vehicle or building.
    I believe PA laws are quite clear in regards to the LTCF requirement with a firearm in the vehicke.
    Quote Originally Posted by Grey Bearded One View Post
    He's allowed because he's special.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    ..............., Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    5,444
    Rep Power
    18905654

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    Quote Originally Posted by jw34 View Post
    Oh, I hear ya, if we're trying to define the word concealed, which you posted in response to concealing with a vehicle or building.
    I believe PA laws are quite clear in regards to the LTCF requirement with a firearm in the vehicke.
    I presume you are discussing the language excerpted from 18 Pa CS §6106(a):
    any person who
    carries a firearm in any vehicle or any person who carries a
    firearm concealed on or about his person
    Are you aware of any Pa statute or court addressing:

    • limitations on the scope of the default UFA definition of 'vehicle' (1 PA CS §1991)???
    • How does one interpret "in"?
    • What if one rides 'on' [as opposed to 'in'] the vehicle such as a motorcycle which does not have a physical envelope about the occupant?

    Still think "PA laws are quite clear in regards to the LTCF requirement with a firearm in the vehicke [sic]" ???

    Yes my previous post was in response to a probable meaning of "concealed".
    Last edited by tl_3237; March 1st, 2015 at 01:20 PM.
    IANAL

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    505
    Rep Power
    58717

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    I thought you had to be a PA resident to open carry in PA.
    http://www.slcfsa.com/index.html
    http://www.pafoa.org/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=1130&dateline=1165613  693Remember...Terrorist are attacking Civilians; Not the Government. Protect Yourself!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
    (Franklin County)
    Age
    53
    Posts
    11,846
    Rep Power
    21474864

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    Quote Originally Posted by RugerNiner View Post
    I thought you had to be a PA resident to open carry in PA.
    Based on what?
    Get your "Guns Save Lives" stickers today! PM for more info.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Harrisburg area, Pennsylvania
    (Dauphin County)
    Posts
    4,683
    Rep Power
    21474856

    Default Re: open carry at the green dragon

    Quote Originally Posted by RugerNiner View Post
    I thought you had to be a PA resident to open carry in PA.
    You don't.
    I am not a lawyer. Nothing I say or write is legal advice.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. To open carry or not open carry that is the question.
    By zoanemesis in forum Open Carry
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: April 25th, 2012, 11:42 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: October 25th, 2010, 11:32 AM
  3. Replies: 38
    Last Post: October 30th, 2009, 03:53 AM
  4. Friday O/C @ Green Dragon
    By Searcher67 in forum General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 28th, 2009, 09:14 PM
  5. Open Carry vs. Concealed Carry ~ A paper by Garry E. Harvey
    By Pa. Patriot in forum Concealed Carry
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: November 29th, 2008, 05:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •