What are your thoughts on this pistol?

[itsmyright]

Its nice and thin but I'll stick with my LCP.

I agree, and not as many "Tactical Reloads" necessary

[TheWolff]

I didn't catch it in the video, are the barrels interchangeable in 9mm and 45?

[PaleDriver]

I would fear the break mechanism, what if it failed while being fired? you would have a face full of fire.
Also I think the LCP hurts bad enough to fire being a similar width (<1") butt. A 45 would just hurt twice as much.

[Glockman]

If you want a very small gun get a ruger LCP. If you want a small gun get a Ruger LC9 If you want one medium gun to do every thing get a Glock 19.

These are reliable guns with a provern track record.

[Zet70]

Did he mention two barrels are included?

[EandGWZ]

I'd bite for $75

[RHGregory3]

Someone asked about these at work the other day and I had never heard of them - sounds like it was to their benefit! I'd take almost any other pistol over it.

[Soldat222]

I also thought it was far to expensive for a 2 shot derringer. I mean, I can see the reason behind somebody wanting a very small light gun that packs two very powerful shots for that "oh shit" situation, especially women.

However, I see this as being a failure for at least two reasons. Those being the Bond Arms derringers



And American Derringer



Both of which are available in either .38special/.357 Magnum or .410/.45LC. SO for half the price roughly you can get a derringer of pretty much equal power.

[EandGWZ]

That Bond Arms Piece is nice

[JonEMTP]

I'm going to concur... if it was $200, it might make a decent BUG... 2+2 of .45 over 7 of .380 actually doesn't sound TOO terrible. And it is a novelty.

But it's overpriced for the value I would put on it.

If you want something small, go buy a J-frame (or similar) revolver, or a .380 semi-auto (or even a 9mm variant - PF9, DB9, LC9).