FBI wants palm prints, eye scans, tattoo mapping

[WhiteFeather]

Note nothing in article says its going to be used ONLY for criminals

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/02/...ics/index.html

CLARKSBURG, West Virginia (CNN) -- The FBI is gearing up to create a massive computer database of people's physical characteristics, all part of an effort the bureau says to better identify criminals and terrorists.


But it's an issue that raises major privacy concerns -- what one civil liberties expert says should concern all Americans.

The bureau is expected to announce in coming days the awarding of a $1 billion, 10-year contract to help create the database that will compile an array of biometric information -- from palm prints to eye scans.

Kimberly Del Greco, the FBI's Biometric Services section chief, said adding to the database is "important to protect the borders to keep the terrorists out, protect our citizens, our neighbors, our children so they can have good jobs, and have a safe country to live in."

But it's unnerving to privacy experts.

"It's the beginning of the surveillance society where you can be tracked anywhere, any time and all your movements, and eventually all your activities will be tracked and noted and correlated," said Barry Steinhardt, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Technology and Liberty Project.



The FBI already has 55 million sets of fingerprints on file. In coming years, the bureau wants to compare palm prints, scars and tattoos, iris eye patterns, and facial shapes. The idea is to combine various pieces of biometric information to positively identify a potential suspect.

A lot will depend on how quickly technology is perfected, according to Thomas Bush, the FBI official in charge of the Clarksburg, West Virginia, facility where the FBI houses its current fingerprint database. Watch what the FBI hopes to gain »

"Fingerprints will still be the big player," Bush, assistant director of the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services Division, told CNN.

But he added, "Whatever the biometric that comes down the road, we need to be able to plug that in and play."

First up, he said, are palm prints. The FBI has already begun collecting images and hopes to soon use these as an additional means of making identifications. Countries that are already using such images find 20 percent of their positive matches come from latent palm prints left at crime scenes, the FBI's Bush said.

The FBI has also started collecting mug shots and pictures of scars and tattoos. These images are being stored for now as the technology is fine-tuned. All of the FBI's biometric data is stored on computers 30-feet underground in the Clarksburg facility.

In addition, the FBI could soon start comparing people's eyes -- specifically the iris, or the colored part of an eye -- as part of its new biometrics program called Next Generation Identification.

Nearby, at West Virginia University's Center for Identification Technology Research, researchers are already testing some of these technologies that will ultimately be used by the FBI.

"The best increase in accuracy will come from fusing different biometrics together," said Bojan Cukic, the co-director of the center.

But while law enforcement officials are excited about the possibilities of these new technologies, privacy advocates are upset the FBI will be collecting so much personal information.

"People who don't think mistakes are going to be made I don't think fly enough," said Steinhardt.

He said thousands of mistakes have been made with the use of the so-called no-fly lists at airports -- and that giving law enforcement widespread data collection techniques should cause major privacy alarms.

"There are real consequences to people," Steinhardt said. Watch concerns over more data collection »

You don't have to be a criminal or a terrorist to be checked against the database. More than 55 percent of the checks the FBI runs involve criminal background checks for people applying for sensitive jobs in government or jobs working with vulnerable people such as children and the elderly, according to the FBI.

The FBI says it hasn't been saving the fingerprints for those checks, but that may change. The FBI plans a so-called "rap-back" service in which an employer could ask the FBI to keep the prints for an employee on file and let the employer know if the person ever has a brush with the law. The FBI says it will first have to clear hurdles with state privacy laws, and people would have to sign waivers allowing their information to be kept.

Critics say people are being forced to give up too much personal information. But Lawrence Hornak, the co-director of the research center at West Virginia University, said it could actually enhance people's privacy.

"It allows you to project your identity as being you," said Hornak. "And it allows people to avoid identity theft, things of that nature." Watch Hornak describe why he thinks it's a "privacy enhancer" »

There remains the question of how reliable these new biometric technologies will be. A 2006 German study looking at facial recognition in a crowded train station found successful matches could be made 60 percent of the time during the day. But when lighting conditions worsened at night, the results shrank to a success rate of 10 to 20 percent.

As work on these technologies continues, researchers are quick to admit what's proven to be the most accurate so far. "Iris technology is perceived today, together with fingerprints, to be the most accurate," said Cukic.

But in the future all kinds of methods may be employed. Some researchers are looking at the way people walk as a possible additional means of identification.

The FBI says it will protect all this personal data and only collect information on criminals and those seeking sensitive jobs.

The ACLU's Steinhardt doesn't believe it will stop there.

"This had started out being a program to track or identify criminals," he said. "Now we're talking about large swaths of the population -- workers, volunteers in youth programs. Eventually, it's going to be everybody."

[billamj]

Anyone who was in the military since the mid-seventies already has all that information on file. We were the testbed for the majority of that technology. Do I like it? No, but I can't do a damned thing about it now.

[larrymeyer]

Now the big thing is to get every service mans DNA

[Emptymag]

Tinfoil contact lenses anyone?

[sjl127]

...among those are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

My question is: Why is there a need to track everyone?

[Agent Ronin]

Bah im going to laugh when they realize that a database that size needs at least one supercomputer to process all those records... As for me giving up that information voluntarily, hell no.

I will however give them my ass-print for free

[josh]

...among those are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

My question is: Why is there a need to track everyone?

That is a key tool in the quest to gain absolute power over ones subjects.


It worked for Hitler and Stalin.

[sjl127]

Just making sure I was not the only one who thought like that.

[Mark]

Just making sure I was not the only one who thought like that.

there are manny like us.

[Kenshin]

My biggest problem with all of this stuff as it stands now is the processing and retrieval of all of this information. As Ronin had said about the super computer needed to process and recall of this information. Lets have a little fun with the math here. This also has a lot to do with Real ID system and how inefficient it is going to be.

Lets us a round population atm according to the census bureau we have 303,000,000+ people in this country. Now lets use that number whether its citizens or not for the real ID.


ASSUME THAT THE LAST SEARCH RESULT WILL GIVE YOU A MATCH(This is not always true but statistically it covers the bases)

303,000,000 people x 10 fingerprints = 3,030,000,000 finger prints. Yes thats assuming that everyone has all 10 of their fingers left. 3 billion finger prints.

Now lets assume that the average computer can compare 10 finger prints a second.

3,030,000,000prints/10 prints/sec = 303,000,000 sec

303,000,000sec / 3600 (sec/hour) = 84,166.6 hours

84,167 hours / 24 hours/day = 3507 days

3507 days / 365.25 days / year = 9.6 years !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Thats 9.6 years to get a match on a single print that was the very last print. Thats if the computers can do it at 10 prints/ sec.

Now if you can do 10,000 prints / sec

You end up with with 3.5 days to match a finger print. Thats if the computer can do the calculation fast enough to match 10,000 PRINTS EVERY SECOND.


There is a reason why only a limited number of people have their fingerprints in the system and why every system is different.

Now factor in the retinal scans and DNA scans they want to put on the Real ID and figure out how long it would take to scan a database that large. Or 50 databases one for each state. days, weeks, months, years, decades, hell you may even be dead before they get a match. And thats with only ONE thing queued!!!!!!!! It wont happen. We have powerful computers but not that powerful and the shear amount of information stored would be so massive that if the data is wiped or has to be backed up it would take months or years to do.

Its no wonder the states dont want to do the Real ID. It will cost the tax payers billions if not trillions of dollars. Because the states have to setup the funding for it the National Government thinks the states should do it.