Results 1 to 10 of 317
Thread: Isosceles vs Weaver
-
January 31st, 2012, 04:38 PM #1
Isosceles vs Weaver
which shooting stance do you feel is the best for defensive shooting and why?
-
January 31st, 2012, 05:42 PM #2
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
Iso. I used to shoot exclusively Weaver until I started taking some training classes, but now I've made the switch to Iso.
More secure base, easier to move/run and gun
Easier to transition to weak hand or single strong hand or single weak hand
Better balance.
Easier to scan for potential threats.
Goes hand-in-hand with the way most people are trained to shoot carbines (AK, AR, etc)
I'm sure I'm missing more. These have been my experiences which I realize might not work for everyone. Fine, do what works for you.You can never have enough horsepower or ammunition.
-
January 31st, 2012, 06:15 PM #3Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
-
Peaceburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Posts
- 416
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
I've never been in a gunfight but in matches I use both.
-
January 31st, 2012, 07:01 PM #4
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
I used to shoot Weaver. However, somehow over the past few years I've made the change to ISO. Not sure when it happened exactly. I think it was when I stopped shooting revolvers in the old cup and saucer grip. I know that I shoot better ISO than I do Weaver and that's what matters to me. None of this proves that one way is better than the other, it's all what works for the individual.
It's all fun and games, til someone shoots your bobber!
-
January 31st, 2012, 07:04 PM #5
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
Whatever feels right stance...
-
January 31st, 2012, 07:24 PM #6Active Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
-
Lower Gwynedd,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Age
- 46
- Posts
- 181
- Rep Power
- 217358
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
I rarely lock up in any stance when shooting. I like to move around, switch up foot placement, switch up standing, kneeling, prone, falling back etc. I work more on tactical reloads, reloads, transition and draws. The feet will go where they are comfortable.
If I had to classify it, its most likely a weaver looking stance on crack. The ISO stance is great with concealment or cover firing from a port, but IMO just opens you up too much to become a bullet sponge.
-
January 31st, 2012, 07:31 PM #7
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
Isos...in most cases. Odd situations and shots will happen and those need to be practiced....but, in most standing or running shots Isos is faster and lends itself to leaning around cover easier.
The one major exception are those who are cross-eye dominant and I've found that they tend to do better with Weaver.
Lycannoonewaythrope
I taught Chuck Norris to bump-fire.
-
January 31st, 2012, 07:37 PM #8
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
Excellent information and reasoning here.
Thanks!...and they have a plan...
-
January 31st, 2012, 07:47 PM #9
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
Primarily Weaver for Lycan's reasons..
USMC 2/10 1982-85~REMEMBER FT. HOOD~
-
January 31st, 2012, 07:48 PM #10Active Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
Apollo,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 101
- Rep Power
- 363645
Re: Isosceles vs Weaver
Learned on Weaver and it's natural for me.
I've been told by more than a few experienced shooter and LEO that the Iso more closely mimics the posture taken by most people in real world situations though. I've tried to switch and it feels awkward to me. I've struggled with it and always revert back to Weaver.
Similar Threads
-
Weaver 2.5-10x with Dup reticle & red dot
By tcmikey in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: November 10th, 2009, 12:46 AM -
Weaver vs Modern Isosceles for revolvers
By tobor in forum GeneralReplies: 7Last Post: September 1st, 2008, 02:44 AM -
Weaver K15 in Pa.
By armabill in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: May 8th, 2008, 01:34 PM -
WTS: Weaver T36
By armabill in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: May 16th, 2007, 10:04 AM
Bookmarks