Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Philipsburg, Pennsylvania
    (Centre County)
    Posts
    467
    Rep Power
    19886

    Default SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    So planning ahead for tax return, pending nothing coming up, I was thinking of getting a new horse for the stable. I'm torn between two. I've been wanting to get another .45 and narrowed it down. I'm looking at getting either on of the SIG 220 variants or a Springfield Full-size MC Operator 1911. Any ideas?

    SIG: http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductDetails/p220.aspx

    Springfield: http://www.springfield-armory.com/armory.php?version=34

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Mercer, Pennsylvania
    (Mercer County)
    Posts
    3,678
    Rep Power
    21474856

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    Do you have any 1911s?
    There's no such thing as a free lunch.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Perry Co., Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,831
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    That's a tough one. I have a Sig P220 Carry & a Springfield RO. If I HAD to choose I think I'd keep the RO.........(Maybe, I dunno'!)
    "It's hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong."
    Thomas Sowell

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Center Valley, Pennsylvania
    (Lehigh County)
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    I love my p220. I wish I would have gotten night sights but I can always get them in the future.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Upper Bucks, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,170
    Rep Power
    532038

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    I have a Springfield loaded non operator and I absolutely love it...It was my first 1911, however, not the first one I have shot..

    I have never shot the p220, but I am not a diehard Sig Lover like some..both are solid guns and would be happy with either one

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Richland Township (Bucks County) PA, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    40
    Posts
    387
    Rep Power
    55845

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    Keeping in mind my eternal bias... MC op, hands down.
    "More is lost through indecision than wrong decision"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Exton, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    250
    Rep Power
    22603

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    Two great guns. It may boil down to "do I want a gun with a safety lever or not?"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    521
    Rep Power
    1038012

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    I have owned both a Sig 220 and a Springfield TRP. Both were very accurate and reliable, although I think you have a better shot at out of the box reliability with the Sig because 1911s do sometimes need a trip home for reliability tweaking. Ultimate accuracy went to the TRP but the 220 was very close. The 1911 had a much better trigger but that is the real draw of a 1911, isn't it? The 1911 is a bigger and heavier gun. For home defense purposes you really can't go wrong with a railed operator. If you plan to carry I would think one of the aluminum framed 220s might be a better fit. If you want to do both with a 1911 you could always look at the lightweight operator with the aluminum frame. These are all nice pistols.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    back to Port Charlotte, Florida
    Age
    60
    Posts
    5,483
    Rep Power
    3627622

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    Both pistols are about the same size (if both full size), so carry shouldn't matter. Both have the same mag cap. Both can be used in battle. Both look like a pistol should look (and feel, as well). IMO, it boils down to which variant of Sig P220 you are talking about. If it is a Super Match or a Match Elite, then it is a no brainer, in my book. Has to be the Sig.
    BCM and Glock...for a bigger pile of 'cold dead hands' brass.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
    (Northampton County)
    Posts
    945
    Rep Power
    2575134

    Default Re: SIG 220 or Springfield Loaded Operator 1911

    Keep in mind that the 220 can be had in a SAO configuration if you prefer. Personally my vote would be for the 220, as I've never owned a Sig that wasn't 100% reliable and dead nuts accurate.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 30
    Last Post: August 29th, 2010, 04:49 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 19th, 2010, 11:12 AM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: May 30th, 2009, 05:18 PM
  4. Springfield Loaded/TRP/Operator Les Baer
    By roman3667 in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 14th, 2009, 12:52 AM
  5. WTB Springfield Loaded/Operator/TRP
    By roman3667 in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 14th, 2009, 12:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •