Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    McKeesport, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    249
    Rep Power
    115893

    Default Range test Ruger LC9

    Took my new Ruger to the range today. Between myself and my friend we fired 300 rounds. No malfunctions of any kind.Fairly accurate for such a small pistol. Also took my Kel-tec Pf9 and my Taurus 709 along for comparision. I like the feel of the Ruger better than the other two, but I have to say that the 709 is every bit as good as the Ruger in the accuracy department. The Kel-tec had no problems either but the Ruger just feels better to me.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Noxen, Pennsylvania
    (Wyoming County)
    Posts
    545
    Rep Power
    47310

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    I got one and it shoots very well for how small it is. No problems yet, but I only have around 200 rounds through. How do you carry it btw?
    "I quote no authors but God and experience" Principles Osteopathy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW, Pennsylvania
    (Beaver County)
    Posts
    792
    Rep Power
    3531827

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    Just wondering does the LOADED CHAMBER IDICATOR get in the way of the sights? Or hinder with holstering?
    I wish Ruger made an option without it and the manual safety but more so the indicator I just find quite annoying. (I know opinions are like...)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    67
    Rep Power
    11710

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    Quote Originally Posted by spartakis252 View Post
    Just wondering does the LOADED CHAMBER IDICATOR get in the way of the sights? Or hinder with holstering?
    I wish Ruger made an option without it and the manual safety but more so the indicator I just find quite annoying. (I know opinions are like...)
    I have shot a friend's, and I haven't noticed that it interferes with the sights. I agree with Rey that it's far more comfortable than the PF-9.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Hartford, Ohio
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    Quote Originally Posted by spartakis252 View Post
    Just wondering does the LOADED CHAMBER IDICATOR get in the way of the sights? Or hinder with holstering?
    I wish Ruger made an option without it and the manual safety but more so the indicator I just find quite annoying. (I know opinions are like...)
    No, It doesn't get in the way of the sights or holstering (I use a crossbreed mini-tuck) that I have noticed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    McKeesport, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    249
    Rep Power
    115893

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    i don't even notice the loaded chamber indicator when I am shooting. I just ordered a holster that hangs on your belt loop that is supposed to look like a cell phone holder. I'll let you know how it is as soon as it comes in.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Noxen, Pennsylvania
    (Wyoming County)
    Posts
    545
    Rep Power
    47310

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    I have been carrying in mine in my pocket without any snags.
    "I quote no authors but God and experience" Principles Osteopathy

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Kingston, Pennsylvania
    (Luzerne County)
    Posts
    94
    Rep Power
    201

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    I had the LC9 and it's a dandy gun. Never had problems with the indicator interferring with the sights or holstering. I carried it in a Don Hume IWB and it was practically unnoticeable. Ran over 600 rounds without a problem.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ev, Pennsylvania
    (Bedford County)
    Posts
    429
    Rep Power
    1009623

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    Could you do some picture comparisons of the pf-9, the taurus 709, and the LC9?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    McKeesport, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    249
    Rep Power
    115893

    Default Re: Range test Ruger LC9

    Quote Originally Posted by pennsylvaniaboy View Post
    Could you do some picture comparisons of the pf-9, the taurus 709, and the LC9?
    Sorry, but I don't know how to do pictures.
    I just received a holster that is called " Sneaky Pete". it is designed to look like a case for some kind of computer. So far I have been carrying it and no one has said a word about it It is fairly comfortable.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FrankenGlock range test
    By IronButt in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 23rd, 2009, 05:01 PM
  2. Range Test
    By f14tcat691 in forum General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: October 16th, 2009, 06:03 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: May 24th, 2009, 01:00 PM
  4. Ruger p95 At range
    By 40 cal in forum General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 11th, 2009, 10:44 PM
  5. Mosin Nagant- first range test.
    By tec in forum General
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: November 3rd, 2007, 08:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •