Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
January 16th, 2008, 07:46 AM #1Super Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
-
Erie,
Pennsylvania
(Erie County) - Posts
- 970
- Rep Power
- 110401
DC appellate Court Upholds Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Gun Makers
DC Appellate Court Upholds Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Gun Makers
Source: Ted Novin - NSSF
NEWTOWN, Conn. -- Earlier today, a unanimous (3-0) District of Columbia Court of Appeals upheld the May 2006 decision of District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Brook Hedges dismissing a lawsuit, filed in January 2000, by the District of Columbia and the families of nine victims of criminal shootings that occurred in the district. Writing for the district's high court, Associate Judge Michael William Farrell ruled that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), signed into law by President Bush in October 2005, required dismissal of the plaintiffs' lawsuit against 25 firearm manufacturers. The district and the plaintiffs had sued the manufacturers under the district's so-called Assault Weapons Manufacturing Strict Liability Act which imposes automatic and absolute liability on manufacturers for injuries resulting from criminal shootings in the district, even if, as Judge Farrell observed, the criminal shootings happened "years after the manufacture or sale and despite the utmost care taken in the manufacture or sale" of the firearm.
In upholding the dismissal Judge Farrell noted that Congress' purpose in passing the PLCAA was to "prohibit [lawsuits] against manufacturers … for the harm solely caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearms products ..." The court wrote that allowing the district's lawsuit to proceed "would, in our view, frustrate Congress' clear intention."
"Today's ruling is very gratifying to members of the firearms industry," said Lawrence G. Keane, chief spokesperson for the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the firearm industry's trade association. "The District of Columbia lawsuit was like blaming car makers for drunk-driving accidents."
In passing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, Congress understood that junk lawsuits like the district's defied common sense and were an abuse of the judicial system that threatened to bankrupt a responsible and law-abiding industry. The ruling is another major setback for gun-control groups, principally the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which pursued and funded many of the municipal lawsuits against the firearms industry.
The appellate court also rejected the district's claim that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act was unconstitutional. In rejecting the district's arguments, the court wrote, "Congress was especially concerned with lawsuits that have been commenced seeking money damages and other relief against manufacturers and sellers of firearms for harms caused by the misuse of their products by others, including criminals, and with the threat to interstate commerce of thus imposing liability on an entire industry for the harm solely caused by others."
-
January 16th, 2008, 04:39 PM #2
Re: DC appellate Court Upholds Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Gun Makers
It's almost sad that news like this is good. What I mean is: This lawsuit and others like it should have all been thrown out before any decision is made! These A-holes are wasting taxpayer money filing these ridiculous lawsuits.
Similar Threads
-
Ammo Makers Prepare for Drop in Demand
By Lambo in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: July 23rd, 2007, 11:27 PM -
Holster makers you like
By luckyned7 in forum GeneralReplies: 20Last Post: June 16th, 2007, 07:45 AM -
Law makers should write jokes
By Montell C. Williams in forum GeneralReplies: 3Last Post: May 28th, 2007, 07:20 PM -
A sign causes lawsuit
By SGTUSArmy in forum GeneralReplies: 42Last Post: May 6th, 2007, 02:03 PM -
Democratic Law Makers Rally for Gun Control
By Gunners762 in forum GeneralReplies: 3Last Post: October 19th, 2006, 12:57 AM
Bookmarks