mob of Ron Paul supporters chases Sean Hannity down

[fultonCoShooter]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMrHorlOB0k&e

[billamj]

So Ron Paul supporters don't believe that commentators are allowed to have their own opinions that differ from that of the supporters? Interesting.

[LastManOut]

Seemed to be a boisterous but peaceful demonstration against Sean's attacks of Ron Paul. No problem here.

[XD45]

way to ruin your cause

[P-11 shooter]

They were just voicing they're oppinion. Sean Hanity sucks.

I tell people they suck all the time.

[billamj]

They were just voicing they're oppinion. Sean Hanity sucks.

I tell people they suck all the time.

They are definitely allowed to voice their opinions. They are not allowed to follow him around, that is called harassment.

[wellcraft]

i like sean hanity and he hasn't attacked ron paul, in fact he has invited ron paul onto his radio show and paul has declined. hannity has discussed ron pauls' stand on the issues and voice his disagreement with them. but that is honest open debate not an attack on ron paul personally.

[KLiQ]

video was removed due to TOS

[NineseveN]

i like sean hanity and he hasn't attacked ron paul, in fact he has invited ron paul onto his radio show and paul has declined. hannity has discussed ron pauls' stand on the issues and voice his disagreement with them. but that is honest open debate not an attack on ron paul personally.

Laughable.

[Eugene V. Debs]

They are definitely allowed to voice their opinions. They are not allowed to follow him around, that is called harassment.

Legally speaking, not necessarily.

And ethically speaking, direct action has a long history in this country as a legitimate form of political struggle. Hannity and his network are using their journalistic power irresponsibly, by silencing those who challenge the authoritarian status quo. Paul's supporters are completely justified in using aggressive direct action tactics against such media support for tyranny.

Tactically speaking, not so certain it's a good idea.