Results 21 to 30 of 30
-
July 14th, 2011, 02:25 AM #21Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
-
Shamokin,
Pennsylvania
(Northumberland County) - Age
- 61
- Posts
- 43
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
Any reply to your email yet?
-
July 14th, 2011, 04:15 AM #22
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
Just in general, I think they are in violation if they are posting & enforcing such rules.
I mean really, Have them explain how they can & will enforce it!
If not, Then what Law's apply to them. Are they Lawless?? I don't think so.
There might be a clause about inside any Buildings they may own maybe because of Insurance Carrier. Maybe! I'm just tossing that up to think about.
By no means em' I an expert on this subject, but I'm just looking at it in the simplest of ways. As soon as anyone starts to tosses all kinds of Reg's and terms "Muddy the water" & Your now so fare from the original issue. You never get to the truth. That there is a RED FLAG!!
If it were Legal, They should be able to easy explain it away that everyone can understand & "sorta" agree.
If it were private Land. It would be a none issue, It would be private.
Its not private, Its Public/County Land.
Unless there putting in something that is on the List:
Places Off-Limits While Carrying in PA
Thats just my take on the issue.
-
July 14th, 2011, 08:15 AM #23
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption?
Here is the upgrade to your response to send back to any reply you receive from the commonwealth legal authority opinion Regarding Local Ordinances Concerning Firearms that was sent on Aug 24, 2009 to all 67 counties district attorney’s from TOM CORBETT Attorney General now upgraded to governor TOM CORBETT
here is link on PAFOA to document that we got
http://forum.pafoa.org/1021822-post-74.html
Keep this letter handy for any title 18 Pa.C.S. § 6120 (Limitation on the regulation of firearms and ammunition), along with many other section of the UFA with "claimed" local control over Regulation of them.
On a related subject when asking them to follow the rule of law doesn't work and court action is required here is proposed legislative fix to help address that problem to at least try to recover for the cost of compliance with a court action.
2011-12 Proposed law for dealing with Municipalities Violating Preemption Law
http://forum.pafoa.org/pennsylvania-...ption-law.html
.Learn how to really SUPPORT the 2nd Amendment cause Go To http://www.foac-pac.org/
-
July 14th, 2011, 01:58 PM #24
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
"Conflict is inevitable, but combat is optional.”
-
July 19th, 2011, 05:29 AM #25Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
-
Shamokin,
Pennsylvania
(Northumberland County) - Age
- 61
- Posts
- 43
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
If you haven't gotten a respond by now, I'd assume you're being ignored. IMO this is publically owned land and they have no legal method to ban legal possession. As such, my impatience is proving to become most taxing. I'm soon inclined to take a copy of Corbett's letter to them in person. Thanks WF for the link! I have plans to use it for multiple issues.
-
July 19th, 2011, 08:53 AM #26
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
I got a call-back the other day, where she said she never received my initial e-mail. I re-sent it from a different account, and actually JUST got a response yesterday afternoon from them..
"Eskimo: Thank you for your e-mail. I will forward this on to our County solicitor for review and also to our consultants. We appreciate your input. Please keep following our project at www.anthraciteadventure.com
Thanks,
Kathy Jeremiah"
It was cc'd to:
jbuerkle@pashekla.com
bgood@pashekla.com
pat.mack@norrycopa.net
frank.garrigan@norrycopa.net
chaws@barley.com (Charles Haws)
Sorry, yesterday was nuts, I meant to update the thread."Conflict is inevitable, but combat is optional.”
-
July 19th, 2011, 09:07 AM #27
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
I don't send e-mails. I send hard-copy correspondence. I wait a while if no response, then I send a follow-up hard-copy. I'm doing that today with the Pennsylvania Court Administrator. Someone has to be responsible for firearms storage at court facilities.
-
July 19th, 2011, 12:15 PM #28Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
-
Shamokin,
Pennsylvania
(Northumberland County) - Age
- 61
- Posts
- 43
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
(Kathy Jeremiah)...... If this is who I think it is, she and her father got busted a number of years ago in the city for stealing tax money or something. He was the treasurer at the time. Irrelevant? Perhaps but it leads me to be distrustful.
-
August 17th, 2011, 02:39 PM #29
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
Sent my 1-month follow-up today, as promised. We'll see.
"Conflict is inevitable, but combat is optional.”
-
August 18th, 2011, 02:01 PM #30
Re: "Municipal authority" operating county-owned land preemption? - E-MAIL sent!
Response from Kathy:
"Mr. Eskimo: Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. The Northumberland County Solicitor is reviewing the Uniform Firearms Act and we will get back to you as soon as all pertinent information has been gathered and reviewed. Thank you for your patience."
I don't see where there's much to review.. UFA says "IN ANY WAY"... but we'll see.Last edited by Eskimo; August 18th, 2011 at 02:08 PM.
"Conflict is inevitable, but combat is optional.”
Similar Threads
-
Beaver County Sheriff will only issue LTCFs for "small handguns"
By HiredGoon in forum BeaverReplies: 32Last Post: December 30th, 2010, 11:36 AM -
San Louis Obispo County Sheriff's deputies response to a "man with a gun" call.
By LorDiego01 in forum NationalReplies: 1Last Post: September 22nd, 2010, 11:16 AM -
"This isn't public property...It's owned by the city" a.k.a. OC at Musikfest II
By US Militiaman in forum GeneralReplies: 81Last Post: August 11th, 2009, 10:30 PM -
"Taxpayer owned"
By H.E. Pennypacker in forum GeneralReplies: 5Last Post: June 11th, 2009, 02:03 PM -
Another Preemption Lawbreaker, York City to introduce "Lost & Stolen" on Tues, 11-18
By tes151 in forum GeneralReplies: 80Last Post: June 3rd, 2009, 10:30 PM
Bookmarks