Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
February 21st, 2011, 02:54 AM #1
SAF files response to NJ motion to dismiss (CCW issuance case).
Here is the link. 62 pages, but quite a good read. Enjoy.
http://saf.org/legal.action/nj.lawsu...Opposition.pdfNRA Certified Firearms Instructor-2009,classes available.
-
February 21st, 2011, 03:43 AM #2
Re: SAF files response to NJ motion to dismiss (CCW issuance case).
While the rights of speech, petition, and assembly intrinsically raise
public safety risks – sometimes acutely – modern First Amendment jurisprudence
forbids the preclusion of these activities notwithstanding these risks.8
...
8
It was speech, petition, and assembly – not guns – that recently overturned the Mubarak regime
in Egypt. On the contrary, all of the guns in the army could not contain the power of speech,
petition, and assembly. To the extent Amici would like to hang legal arguments on clichés, they
would be well advised to remember that “the pen is mightier than the sword.”
Edit: and even better:
Brady Amici try to distance their approach from Justice Breyer’s by
asserting that their standard would be “a more heightened form of scrutiny than the
rational basis test” and “more demanding than the ‘interest balancing’ test
suggested by Justice Breyer in dissent[ ] because it does not permit states to
prohibit all firearm ownership.” Brady Br. at 16. However, Justice Breyer in fact
also maintained that his test was more stringent than rational basis review. See
Heller, 554 U.S. at 689-90 (Breyer, J., dissenting); see also id. at 710-11.
Moreover, Justice Breyer’s approach also eschewed prohibitions on all firearms,
instead upholding just the prohibition of handguns. See id. at 708. Tellingly (and
probably fatally), Justice Breyer explicitly relied on the same academic article
11
that Brady Amici now rely upon to articulate their “reasonable regulation” test.
See id. at 691; see also Brady Br. at 15.Last edited by IronSight; February 21st, 2011 at 03:53 AM.
-
February 21st, 2011, 01:05 PM #3
Re: SAF files response to NJ motion to dismiss (CCW issuance case).
It was speech, petition, and assembly – not guns – that recently overturned the Mubarak regime
in Egypt. On the contrary, all of the guns in the army could not contain the power of speech,
petition, and assembly. To the extent Amici would like to hang legal arguments on clichés, they
would be well advised to remember that “the pen is mightier than the sword.
-
February 21st, 2011, 02:08 PM #4
Re: SAF files response to NJ motion to dismiss (CCW issuance case).
This is VERY nice indeed.
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws--that's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." -- Ted Nugent
Similar Threads
-
Response from Casey - Thune - late response
By thefirstndsecond in forum GeneralReplies: 9Last Post: October 16th, 2009, 10:39 AM -
Westmoreland co Sheriff offering remote issuance of LTCF
By medic550 in forum GeneralReplies: 12Last Post: April 14th, 2009, 08:38 PM -
Motion to dismiss update... (Hain v. DeLeo)
By shefearsnothing in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: March 16th, 2009, 09:51 AM
Bookmarks