Quote Originally Posted by jcabin View Post
What if you can prove their intent was to infringe on protected/preempted lawful activity(i won't use constitutional) to keep certain citizens out off township property? They couldn't use the old "well you don't have to come here" could they? To add to that, gun owners aren't a protected class.
On the civil side, you run head-on into the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, Title 42, Section 8541 et seq. Criminally, you'd have to find a criminal statute that applies to the legislative enactment of pre-empted ordinances; I don't know of any.

They are immune to these claims, civilly and criminally.