Results 311 to 319 of 319
Thread: Still More Bad Press For The M-4
-
June 13th, 2010, 11:17 PM #311Grand Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
-
Effort,
Pennsylvania
(Monroe County) - Posts
- 2,262
- Rep Power
- 3681644
-
June 14th, 2010, 08:08 AM #312
Re: Still More Bad Press For The M-4
Not quite right...
When the AR was first issued it was designed around a different propellant, twist rate and round weight. The propellant used did not block the gas system and the original loading was doing what it was designed, that is keyhole when it hit the target and produce traumatic wounds.
Then came the Army Ordnance Board.
For them the round and rifle was not accurate enough, so they changed the propellant to what is used now, had the barrel twist rate changed to make the round more stable. That is what they said publicly. Most thought this was an attempt to sabotage the rifle and have the Army go back to the M14 which THEY chose.
When this mod was issued out to the troops in Vietnam that is when the deification hit the osculation..
Colt sent teams to Vietnam and found out the new propellant was causing the problems, and the lack of maintenance kits and instruction was not helping the troops in the field. Cleaning kits and a comic book were issued to the troops and then it began to work.
The russians in adopting their AK74, took M16's and the original ammo and used that as inspiration for the design of the 5.45x39 round. Since they only wanted a rifle that would work they did not monkey with the ammo, propellant and used a proven design. The result was a rifle that was good at the 300 meter mark and produced the traumatic wounds that the original 5.56round was supposed to make.gotta love her ;)
-
June 14th, 2010, 08:52 AM #313Grand Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
-
Effort,
Pennsylvania
(Monroe County) - Posts
- 2,262
- Rep Power
- 3681644
Re: Still More Bad Press For The M-4
The original propellant for the ammo loaded in the states was extruded powder, a hotter cleaner burning powder. The replacement powder for the ammo loaded for overseas was ball powder, a cooler burning pwder that left carbon residue.
IIRC the original twist was 1:14
-
June 14th, 2010, 04:10 PM #314Banned
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
-
Glendale,
Arizona
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 986
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Still More Bad Press For The M-4
http://randywakeman.com/USArmyM4NationalDisgrace.htm
This is a good article with a lot of links. Covers a lot of ground. Bill T.
-
June 14th, 2010, 07:07 PM #315
Re: Still More Bad Press For The M-4
Thats a bit if an eye opener and no mistake.
The M1. Smackin' the bastards since 1932.
-
June 14th, 2010, 07:30 PM #316Banned
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
-
Glendale,
Arizona
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 986
- Rep Power
- 0
-
February 12th, 2011, 02:11 PM #317
Re: Still More Bad Press For The M-4
yet your building one
The way of the world is radical change power stems from the barrel of a gun
-
February 13th, 2011, 12:47 AM #318
Re: Still More Bad Press For The M-4
Uhhhh, you DO realize this thread is nearly a year old and the poster you are replying to has since been banned right?
EPIC SA FAILWarning: I may not read responses to OP before posting
-
February 13th, 2011, 01:20 AM #319Banned
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
-
...
- Posts
- 4,125
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Still More Bad Press For The M-4
Similar Threads
-
just ordered a new press.
By brian in forum GeneralReplies: 24Last Post: October 28th, 2009, 06:57 PM -
anyone ever use Delta Press?
By thirtyonebravo in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: May 29th, 2009, 03:10 AM -
Cafe Press?
By Tony Fly in forum GeneralReplies: 4Last Post: October 29th, 2008, 12:53 PM -
Seen elsewhere, somewhere at Café Press ...
By King 5.45 in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: October 26th, 2008, 02:51 PM
Bookmarks