Told by constable that I could not carry in Township Building to vote

[ray h]

Filing lawsuits can be profitable and enriching and a source of useful free advertising for the lawyers, but if you keep losing ground for us, then you should stop, if you're on our side.

The case in 2006 was not a loss.
I agree that the word "regulate" is pretty vague and in it's entirety impossible to enforce, so then the courts fall back on intent. The clear intent of the statute is to prohibit each one of thousands of municipality from making up their own little rules and potentially trapping legal gun carriers into unknowingly doing something that is against the local laws, ordinances and rules. Footnote 9 totally goes against the intent and the wording of the statute.
Here's what I get from the footnote, The reality is,this was a judge who didn't like the way the ruling went, (he knew it had to go the way it did) so he added his worthless $.02 at the bottom to discourage future law suites.

You're the expert in these matters so I would encourage anyone who reads my drivel to do as Gunlawyer says, but if I'm confronted with having to defend, I'm going with what the statute says.

[GunLawyer001]

The case in 2006 was not a loss.
I agree that the word "regulate" is pretty vague and in it's entirety impossible to enforce, so then the courts fall back on intent. The clear intent of the statute is to prohibit each one of thousands of municipality from making up their own little rules and potentially trapping legal gun carriers into unknowingly doing something that is against the local laws, ordinances and rules. Footnote 9 totally goes against the intent and the wording of the statute.
Here's what I get from the footnote, The reality is,this was a judge who didn't like the way the ruling went, (he knew it had to go the way it did) so he added his worthless $.02 at the bottom to discourage future law suites.

You're the expert in these matters so I would encourage anyone who reads my drivel to do as Gunlawyer says, but if I'm confronted with having to defend, I'm going with what the statute says.

What you say is not drivel, it's the idealized version of what our system SHOULD be. Legislators argue over the words, the Governor signs bills as written, and then a few judges ignore the words and substitute what they think the law ought to have been. It's not right, but it is what it is.

[Mitch10mm]

What you say is not drivel, it's the idealized version of what our system SHOULD be. Legislators argue over the words, the Governor signs bills as written, and then a few judges ignore the words and substitute what they think the law ought to have been. It's not right, but it is what it is.

This. I often agree with the so called crazies but their truth and rhetoric can find you behind bars because the judge days you are using arguments deemed frivolous

[Adam-12]

I told her they have no authority to do squat, she agreed.

That makes two who don't know what they're talking about.

[poconojoe]

That makes two who don't know what they're talking about.

I told her this meaning it is not illegal to vote while carrying, he cant just say no because they think thats the way it should be, she agreed

[Adam-12]

I told her this meaning it is not illegal to vote while carrying, he cant just say no because they think thats the way it should be, she agreed

On that point you're perfectly right.