Results 161 to 170 of 306
-
December 9th, 2011, 05:08 PM #161
Re: State troopers disarmed me during a traffic stop, awkward but ended positive.
The abuse started long before the OP responded. The first few posts were very civil but it spiraled downward quickly.
When I look at the OP I definitely don't see a guy shitting on the Constitution. I see a guy who is most likely more than a little green when it comes to these encounters, was caught completely off guard and just went with it. I don't know the OP personally so I'm basing all of this on assumptions as are all of you. When all was said and done he wiped his brow and said "whew, that went ok".
I don't see an OP who tried to downplay the 4th and 5th. I see an OP who made a mistake, likely knows he made a mistake now, was insulted and humiliated and is trying to justify his actions. It's human nature. Important distinction for me; trying to provide some justification/thought process to get away from the stream of blows hitting him from all sides. Not justifying his actions because the Constitution doesn't matter to him. And yes I read what he wrote. Again, the words of a guy getting pummeled. Kind of reminds me of;
if you're up to your neck in shit and there are guys all around you shoveling shit at you do you duck?
So my questions (to no one in particular):
-Did he proceed as he did because he just didn't know better or because he truly doesn't give a shit about his rights?
-Can he be educated to respond differently or is he a "lost cause"?
I don't believe for a moment that there's no swaying his opinion.
I'm willing to wager that he's already learned a few things and will respond differently next time.
I'm willing to wager that he's going to be more aware of what's actually happening next time and be a more active participant instead of a spectator.
I feel that everyone, especially the OP would benefit more if the education process remained civil. Reasons cited above for hostility amount to "we don't like what he's saying so instead of reasoning with him we're gonna take him out back and lay him a beating".
I know someone will chime in with "we tried to reason with him..."
Nah. 150-something posts. The first few people reasoned with him but it got ugly quick. If the OP had a chance to respond after say post 4 or 5 I'll bet his response would have been a little different.
My perspective:
I don't feel any need to debate or reason with antis. It generally amounts to a waste of oxygen and I need my oxygen.
This guy is already a gun owner. I feel that it's my/our best interest to educate one another. He's already on our side, no reason to push him away. I never feel like I'm wasting my time debating or reasoning with other gun owners.
So, what am I willing to do besides run my mouth?
I'm willing to refuse unlawful requests.
I'm willing to participate in letter writing efforts as described by GoldCupAbuser.
A question for the forum:
Has anyone ever found out why police run the serial number on a gun?
What I'm asking is what is their legal basis for doing this?
I'm asking because as far as I can tell they have no legal basis and this practice is highly illegal. If we separate the battle into smaller tasks we may be able to move faster. This particular practice seems like a good target. So who do we address the question to in state government?Last edited by photoshooter; December 9th, 2011 at 05:11 PM.
-
December 9th, 2011, 05:41 PM #162
Re: State troopers disarmed me during a traffic stop, awkward but ended positive.
I have. I don't tell anyone to do something I won't do, and in cases like this, something I haven't already done. If you are interested, read some of my OC encounters in the OC forum. It is easy enough to search on my screen name for threads started. One can refuse to comply with the police and still be polite. That understanding seems to be missing in a lot of posts as well, usually from people who think that sticking up for one's legal rights constitutes antisocial behavior. It doesn't. That doesn't mean some people won't be that way, but one can politely refuse to comply and still retain his freedom, dignity, etc.
-
December 9th, 2011, 06:42 PM #163
-
December 9th, 2011, 07:03 PM #164Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
-
Montgomery County,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Posts
- 1,457
- Rep Power
- 0
-
December 9th, 2011, 07:41 PM #165Grand Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
-
NE,
Florida
- Posts
- 1,024
- Rep Power
- 8867461
Re: State troopers disarmed me during a traffic stop, awkward but ended positive.
After many, many, many threads coming from all different sides, I honestly can't think of a single thing that will unilaterally draw applause here. Almost all of these threads get started by people who are posting experiences for the first time. The reason for that? Because after posting up the first, few are willing to post up a second. I'm pretty sure the OP, in this case, is long gone from this thread.
I'm convinced that if someone managed to jump aboard an out of control bus filled with nuns and school children and saved them from careening off a cliff and was hailed a hero, more than a few people here would totally rip him apart for not lawyering up before talking to the police about the incident once they showed up on the scene of even getting involved in the first place. It should probably go into a FAQ sticky that, unless you're ready to be bitch slapped, don't post about your experiences.
Not saying that the OP did or didn't deserve anything in this thread... just saying that people are constantly under-estimating the anal thrashing they are going to get from people who don't see eye-to-eye with their personal and political values, beliefs, and ideologies. The #2 rule right after "never talk to the police" should be "never talk to the forum".
-
December 9th, 2011, 09:16 PM #166
Re: State troopers disarmed me during a traffic stop, awkward but ended positive.
It's overall a strange story, because it appears to me, thru personal evidence and general information, that the PA state police consists of and requires a higher standard for their employees, much moreso than a local PD. If OP had posted that it was his local township PD that did this it wouldn't have caused such a stir, I think.
-
December 9th, 2011, 09:24 PM #167
Re: State troopers disarmed me during a traffic stop, awkward but ended positive.
This is too funny.
WAAAAAAYYY back at the beginning when someone wondered why anyone would ever post about a personal experience on here, I started to type...
My post had the words "nuns", "school bus", and "kittens"...
I deleted it and went elsewhere because sometimes it's just not worth the bother.
I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!
-
December 9th, 2011, 09:31 PM #168
Re: State troopers disarmed me during a traffic stop, awkward but ended positive.
Civil rights lawsuit. Now.
-
December 9th, 2011, 09:33 PM #169
Re: State troopers disarmed me during a traffic stop, awkward but ended positive.
Wow - nearing 5,000 views already - I wonder if members from other forums are linking to this
-
December 9th, 2011, 09:52 PM #170
Re: State troopers disarmed me during a traffic stop, awkward but ended positive.
While many claim to support the right, precious few support the practice.
Similar Threads
-
Positive LEO encounter Lower Makefield, PA (I-95 Traffic stop)
By RHGregory3 in forum Concealed & Open CarryReplies: 46Last Post: June 23rd, 2011, 01:22 PM -
Very positive traffic stop.
By P-11 shooter in forum GeneralReplies: 44Last Post: March 15th, 2009, 10:04 AM -
Any PA State Troopers here?
By pandemic in forum GeneralReplies: 17Last Post: November 8th, 2008, 11:55 AM -
How State Troopers Want You To Act During a Traffic Stop
By crakkajakka15 in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: May 11th, 2008, 06:12 PM -
positive traffic stop with Grove City PD
By carterbeauford in forum GeneralReplies: 11Last Post: December 12th, 2007, 08:38 AM
Bookmarks