Results 11 to 20 of 2683
-
October 30th, 2020, 10:46 PM #11
Re: NFGR/NAGR raises 50,000 to defend Kyle Rittenhouse
IF Kyle Rittenhouse gets convicted of any of the charges. Will that be the hill for all you "not the hill to die on" people ??
--ET
-
October 30th, 2020, 10:53 PM #12
-
October 30th, 2020, 11:22 PM #13
Re: NFGR/NAGR raises 50,000 to defend Kyle Rittenhouse
whoever wins may be "the hill" for a ton of fools out there
-
October 31st, 2020, 08:22 AM #14
Re: NFGR/NAGR raises 50,000 to defend Kyle Rittenhouse
Power always thinks...that it is doing God's service when it is violating all his laws.
-
November 1st, 2020, 02:52 PM #15
-
November 2nd, 2020, 12:46 PM #16
Re: NFGR/NAGR raises 50,000 to defend Kyle Rittenhouse
Looks like Lin Wood is incompetent. He botched the extradition fight, and missed his chance to request a stay. Kyle kas been extradited, and is sitting in an adult prison in Kenosha. Half of the $2M is already gone.
-
November 2nd, 2020, 01:13 PM #17
Re: NFGR/NAGR raises 50,000 to defend Kyle Rittenhouse
The Full Faith & Credit clause makes most interstate extradition battles hopeless for the defendant.
Not sure where a million dollars went, unless he hired an army of investigators to dig up more videos.
BTW, I wouldn't risk death and ruination of my family because the local Wisconsin DA is crooked. It takes more than that to get me to the mattresses. Same reason none of us here are fighting the Burmese army right now. Not our fight. Kick in some money, maybe, but not time to cammie-up and slot any floppies.Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
-
November 2nd, 2020, 02:01 PM #18
Re: NFGR/NAGR raises 50,000 to defend Kyle Rittenhouse
Extradition is just a formality hearing these days. It hearkens back to the time when each state was practically its own country(technically still is). It isn't a trial or evidence hearing, and basically the only argument a person has against being extradited is if your civil rights will be violated in the state that is trying to get you. (example: if South Caroline re-instituted slavery, and a slave ran away to Pennsylvania with South Carolina trying to retrieve you)
Practically all interstate extraditions are upheld.RIP: SFN, 1861, twoeggsup, Lambo, jamesjo, JayBell, 32 Magnum, Pro2A, mrwildroot, dregan, Frenchy, Fragger, ungawa, Mtn Jack, Grapeshot, R.W.J., PennsyPlinker, Statkowski, Deanimator, roland, aubie515, SteveWag
Don't end up in my signature!
-
November 2nd, 2020, 02:11 PM #19
Re: NFGR/NAGR raises 50,000 to defend Kyle Rittenhouse
Listening to Mr. Barnes it sounds like Kyle needs better representation in court. I hope this kid hasn't made a mistake by hiring representation that only cares about the court of public opinion.
As an aside, it would be nice to see the Art. IV Full Faith and Credit Clause used to force all anti-gun states like MD, a state that has no reciprocity with 49 other states, into full reciprocity, the way it was used to force gay marriage upon states opposed.
Maybe PAFOA needs to raise a ton of money and find someone with a LTCF and squeaky clean record to speed down I-81.Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.
-
November 2nd, 2020, 02:41 PM #20
Re: NFGR/NAGR raises 50,000 to defend Kyle Rittenhouse
Full Faith & Credit doesn't let one state supersede the laws and police powers of another state; if Utah outlawed alcohol and you have a PA liquor license, you don't get to open a bar in Utah. And back when the drinking age in NJ was lower than PA's, PA resident weren't bound by PA's laws while in NJ. They could also gamble in Atlantic City without violating PA's gambling laws. At the same time, a lawful debt incurred in AC for gambling losses, would be enforceable back in PA under FF&C, if you got a NJ court judgment.
FF&C refers more to status things, like a felony conviction in PA means you have a record if you're in NJ, and getting married in Vegas means you're still married in PA. What you're talking about is overriding the police powers of another state.
What WOULD work would be a Federal law requiring all states to recognize the carry permits of any other state, the way the 1986 FOPA interstate carry provisions override state laws under limited circumstances. Then you're in the Supremacy Clause territory.Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
Similar Threads
-
GOA Press Release: Joe Biden Demonizes Kyle Rittenhouse
By vfinnell in forum NationalReplies: 18Last Post: October 1st, 2020, 08:33 PM -
GOA Speaks Out on Kyle Rittenhouse
By vfinnell in forum NationalReplies: 28Last Post: August 31st, 2020, 07:40 AM
Bookmarks