AWB in exchange for National Reciprocity

[one_Self]

I wouldn't mind giving up assault rifles, having magazine limits and universal background checks in exchange for national reciprocity. Federal law in place giving a defense against local restrictions (ie. different permit for NYC then NY state) thereby making laws uniform and regulated at only the state level.

A carry license could be regulated similar to a driver's license where it's valid in all states and there is a system in place to verify, suspend and so forth. If you get a disability it could be automatically revoked. And of course there would be a national minimum standard set to get one before it's in place for the reciprocity.

I don't think we should regulated a right but it's a fair compromise to get it! I would love for some deal to be worked out.

Your thoughts?

[XavierBK]

Nope. 6 7 8 9 0

[nfafan]

Nope. 6 7 8 9 0

NOPE Too!

How about "we don't start shooting as long as there is no AWB". Now that's a compromise.

[Nietzsche]

I'll have to respectfully disagree with your definition of "fair."

[SigSauer226]

Or the .gov can just stay the FUCK out of my business altogether!

[one_Self]

Or the .gov can just stay the FUCK out of my business altogether!

That's the thing: THEY WON'T. We need to stop being so stubborn and come to the table.

[IGPJAP]

Or the .gov can just stay the FUCK out of my business altogether!

They do in a country called Somalia. No .gov, no taxes, carry all the guns you want, and the highest level of "local control," warlords controlling a 3-4 square block area.

[ksig1869]

NO!!

That's giving up way too much for states that I rarely visit.

[one_Self]

NOPE Too!

How about "we don't start shooting as long as there is no AWB". Now that's a compromise.

That's the problem when it comes to guns: each side refuse to compromise. A right is a right but the democrats aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Something is better than nothing. There would be pluses on both sides for this.

[jerkin]

I take it you don't own an AR15.