Results 1 to 10 of 117
Thread: Which ARs really suck?
-
November 28th, 2014, 07:40 PM #1
Which ARs really suck?
A lot of things seem to have changed with ARs. It used to be only a few were any good. Now, some say go Colt. Others say, "Colt uses the same parts as everybody else. And ARs jam if you don't clean them, you should get a piston. Can somebody help me with my XYZ brand that won't lock back on last round?" LOL. Now there is BCM. And Spikes is just as good. And Rock River. DD is bragging rights.
Asking which AR to buy is almost a worthless question now since you will get 12 answers.
Which ARs suck?
I don't want any mention of good ARs. Or good ARs for the price. I want to know if there are any ARs left that are not reliable or break a lot. I see them all the time on the forums, and the people that own them say they are just as good as anything even though they choke or break.
There used to be a list of bad ARs. Which ones are considered bad today?
-
November 28th, 2014, 07:56 PM #2Grand Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
-
Washington,
Pennsylvania
(Washington County) - Age
- 39
- Posts
- 1,016
- Rep Power
- 304000
Re: Which ARs really suck?
Bushmaster Carbon 15 is awful.
FOAC Member, NRA Member
-
November 28th, 2014, 07:58 PM #3
-
November 28th, 2014, 08:05 PM #4
Re: Which ARs really suck?
I would stay away from BushMaster, DPMS, ATI, and Del-ton. They are lower teir rifles and for the price you are paying you can build a better rifle cheaper from PSA. You really need to decide what you want the rifle for and then set your budget. There are decent rifles in the lower and mid tear range that will run great and hold up to general plinking and range fun and won't break the bank.
-
November 28th, 2014, 08:24 PM #5
Re: Which ARs really suck?
Some of mine and ALL of RXM's suck.
Seriously though, Olympic Arms, Bushmaster Carbon 15, Old Double Star (not new, new double star is supposed to be pretty dang good; new management, new machining processes, better QC...same name, new product), DPMS, Del Ton (as Hodgie said). I was thinking about it today. Some of these crazy parts kits out there in publications like Shotgun News can be junky.
-
November 28th, 2014, 08:38 PM #6
Re: Which ARs really suck?
My AR's have been Colts, BCM & Daniel Defense. Haven't had one that sucks yet.
"It's hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong."
Thomas Sowell
-
November 28th, 2014, 08:52 PM #7
Re: Which ARs really suck?
Those polymer lower Bushmasters really suck. Carbon 15.
-
November 28th, 2014, 08:55 PM #8
Re: Which ARs really suck?
Battle Rifle Company ARs have had major issues. I would not buy any of the PSA PTAC line for my own use either.
I see Bushmaster has now changed the upper receiver of the Carbon 15 to aluminum rather than plastic. Lower is still plastic. I would not buy one but that was a step in the right direction.
-
November 28th, 2014, 09:14 PM #9
Re: Which ARs really suck?
PTAC has gotten a lot of crap in the past it seems like they are coming out of the bow espically with the new .308 line but only time will tell. Until the reviews are in I would stick with PSA's CHF or Preumium line.
-
November 28th, 2014, 09:17 PM #10
Similar Threads
-
FN Five Seven, adequate or suck?
By Jrdn0331 in forum PistolsReplies: 106Last Post: December 30th, 2012, 03:01 PM -
Why revolvers suck!
By abner13 in forum PistolsReplies: 12Last Post: February 19th, 2012, 11:27 AM -
Why YOU Suck:
By soaren in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: April 6th, 2009, 11:15 PM -
You Suck
By TonyF in forum GeneralReplies: 15Last Post: July 23rd, 2007, 10:28 PM
Bookmarks